Reference #18.490dde17.1778455359.30f91207
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.490dde17.1778455359.30f91207
Reference #18.490dde17.1778455359.30f91207
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.490dde17.1778455359.30f91207
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
That morning in Golders Green, one of London’s most visibly Jewish neighborhoods, a man ran through the streets with a knife looking for Jews to stab. He found them. A 70-year-old man. Another in his 30s. Both were attacked outside a synagogue.
By then, the response had become predictable. “Deeply concerning.” A line so worn it had lost all meaning. The next day, the U.K. government raised the national threat level “from substantial, meaning an attack is likely, to severe, meaning an attack is highly likely in the next 6 months,” the last time it was at that level was in November 2021.
In the weeks leading up to it, a Jewish charity’s ambulances had been firebombed in the same neighborhood. A memorial to the victims of the Oct. 7 attacks was burned. Across the country, antisemitic violence has been rising in plain sight. This was not random. It was not isolated. It was a pattern.
FAITH, FREEDOM AND THE FIGHT AGAINST RISING ANTISEMITISM

Police officers work by cordon at the junction of Golders Green Road and the North Circular Road, in the Golders Green neighborhood of north London, on April 29, 2026. (Justin Tallis / AFP via Getty Images)
And the response from the British government — statements, candles, patrols — had ceased to be serious. It had become theater.
Two weeks earlier, Shurat HaDin had filed a complaint at the International Criminal Court against Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez for enabling terror through material support to Iran. The principle was simple: responsibility did not end with the attacker. It extended to those who made the attack possible.
That principle did not stop in Spain.
Britain may not have exported detonators. But it had allowed something else: a climate where calls to “globalize the intifada” echoed through its streets, where incitement was tolerated, and where Jewish life was increasingly treated as expendable.
When a government repeatedly failed to protect a minority from foreseeable, escalating violence, the question was no longer political. It was legal.
THE GLOBAL INTIFADA IS HERE. HAMAS-ALIGNED NETWORKS BROUGHT TERROR TO US SOIL AND WE NEED TO STOP IT

Antisemitic hate was displayed at an anti-Israel protest in London amid record levels of antisemitism in the U.K. following the Hamas terror attacks on Oct. 7. (Campaign Against Antisemitism)
British Jews have already begun rendering their own answer. A growing number of families are quietly making plans to leave for Israel — not in panic, but with clarity. The absolute numbers remain small relative to the size of the community, and most British Jews are determined to stay and fight for the country they love. But the direction matters. Families that two years ago would never have considered emigrating are now weighing it seriously. They have seen this before. They know how it ends.
After Oct. 7, we had been told not to overreact. Marches were just marches. Words were just words.
SIGN UP FOR ANTISEMITISM EXPOSED NEWSLETTER

Former Conservative cabinet minister Michael Gove, Reform UK Deputy Leader Richard Tice and Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis lead a march against antisemitism in central London on Sept. 7, 2025. (Carlos Jasso/AFP via Getty Images)
When a government repeatedly failed to protect a minority from foreseeable, escalating violence, the question was no longer political. It was legal.
The marches had become arson. The rhetoric had become violence. And that morning, it had become a man with a knife hunting Jews outside a synagogue in Golders Green.
The attacker has since been arrested and faces charges. Prime Minister Starmer, after years of treating antisemitism as a public-relations problem, is at last confronting it as the security emergency it has become. He has raised the national threat level. He has promised concrete measures to combat antisemitism. He himself has acknowledged that the era of indifference must end.

London, UK, Dec 9 2023, Pro-Palestinian protesters hold a banner and chant at at anti-Israel protest (Photo by: Andy Soloman/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) (Getty Images)
That recognition is overdue — and welcome. But recognition is not enforcement.
The test now is not what the British government says, but what it does. Statements without arrests are theater. Threat-level upgrades without prosecutions are paperwork. Promises of action without deportations of the foreign agitators leading these marches are promises broken in advance. If the rhetoric is not matched by results — quickly, visibly, and at scale — the fanatics will have learned the only lesson that matters to them: that Britain will flinch, and that Jewish safety can be traded away to keep the peace with those who threaten it.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer visits the Hatzola Northwest independent ambulance base after yesterday’s terrorist incident, on April 30, 2026 in Golders Green, England. A 45-year-old British-Somali man was arrested yesterday, after stabbing two Jewish men, Shloime Rand and Moshe Shine, in a terrorist attack in Golders Green. Both victims are in stable condition, and the suspect was caught by police after being tasered. The government has since pledged £25 million to improve security for the Jewish community following the incident. (James Smith/Sam Snap/Getty Images)
Shurat HaDin did not file the Sánchez complaint as a gesture. We filed it because we have spent two decades building a body of law — in American courts, in European courts and now at The Hague — that holds governments, banks and enablers financially and criminally accountable when they grease the machinery of terror against Jews. We have frozen the assets of terror financiers. We have won judgments against state sponsors. We have made the cost of looking away real.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
The principle behind the Sánchez complaint is straightforward: governments that knowingly create the conditions for attacks on Jews bear legal responsibility for the violence that follows. Spain enabled Iran. The United Kingdom has enabled something different but no less dangerous — a domestic climate in which “globalize the intifada” is chanted in the streets, in which ambulances are firebombed in which Oct. 7 memorials are torched, and in which the official response, until this week, was a candle and a press release.

Protesters hold up flags and placards during a pro-Palestinian demonstration in London, Saturday, Jan. 13, 2024. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
We are already mapping the chain — from the permits issued for the marches, to the speech that crossed the line into incitement, to the warnings ignored, to the attacks that followed. The same legal architecture that put Pedro Sánchez on notice can be turned on Westminster. Sovereignty is not a shield when a government is repeatedly warned of foreseeable, escalating violence against an identifiable minority and chooses, again and again, to do nothing.
The era of indifference is ending — one way or another. Either the British government ends it through enforcement, or we will end it through the courts.

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez arrives to attend a press conference at the Moncloa Palace in Madrid on March 20, 2026. (Pierre-Philippe Marcou / AFP via Getty Images)
To the Jews of Britain: your instincts were right. Your fears were not paranoia. And you are not alone. You have a government that, however belatedly, is beginning to move. You have legal allies prepared to act in every courtroom that will hear us if it does not. And — unlike every Jewish generation before the modern era — you have a Jewish state with an open door. Whether you choose to stay and fight for the Britain you love, or to come home to Israel, you will be defended either way.
This is what “Never Again” looks like when it is not a slogan. It looks like prosecutors. It looks like filings. It looks like the people who tried to make Jewish life unlivable in London discovering that the law has a longer memory than they do.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
We are not finished finding antisemitism and Jew-hatred wherever they hide — in governments, in institutions, in the streets — and we will not stop prosecuting those who enable them. Not in Madrid. Not in London. Not anywhere. We will keep building the cases. We will keep filing the complaints. We will keep dragging the enablers into court until the cost of looking away becomes greater than the cost of standing up.
That is the promise. And we intend to keep it.
Reference #18.490dde17.1778457388.31115c84
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.490dde17.1778457388.31115c84
Reference #18.4d560e17.1778068366.566b1e7
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.4d560e17.1778068366.566b1e7
China’s military activities around Taiwan seem to be intensifying once again. Taiwan’s Defense Ministry (MND) informed on Wednesday that seven Chinese naval ships and one official ship were found active in its vicinity. This development has once again underlined the increasing tension in the Indo-Pacific region.
Taiwan’s Defense Ministry posted on social media platform
7 PLAN vessels and 1 official ship operating around #Taiwan Detected up until 6 am (UTC+8) today. #ROCArmedForces Have monitored the situation and responded. No flight path illustration is provided, as we did not detect #PLA aircraft operating around Taiwan during this… pic.twitter.com/cbSaSQ8sbZ
— 國防部 Ministry of National Defense, ROC(Taiwan) 🇹🇼 (@MoNDefense) May 6, 2026
That is, this time no activity of the Chinese Air Force was recorded, but movement was clearly visible on the maritime front.
Activity increased for the second consecutive day
This is not an isolated incident. A day before this, on Tuesday, Taiwan had also recorded China’s military activities. That day, one Chinese military aircraft, six naval ships and one government vessel were found active around Taiwan.
The MND then said, “As of 6 a.m. today (UTC+8), activity of 1 PLA aircraft, 6 PLAN ships, and 1 official vessel was detected in the vicinity of Taiwan. 1 of the 1 aircraft entered Taiwan’s northern ADIZ area. The ROC Armed Forces monitored the situation and responded.”
1 sorties of PLA aircraft, 6 PLAN vessels and 1 official ship operating around Taiwan detected up until 6 am (UTC+8) today. 1 out of 1 sorties entered Taiwan’s northern part ADIZ. #ROCArmedForces Have monitored the situation and responded. pic.twitter.com/Y3D9larU05
— 國防部 Ministry of National Defense, ROC(Taiwan) 🇹🇼 (@MoNDefense) May 5, 2026
The special thing is that the Chinese aircraft also entered the northern part of Taiwan’s Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), which is generally considered a sign of increasing tension.
Maritime pressure strategy?
Experts believe that China is now increasingly using “gray zone tactics” to put pressure on Taiwan—that is, a sustained military presence without direct war. This time the absence of air activity and presence of only naval ships is being considered a part of this strategy. This allows China to demonstrate its power without open confrontation and forces Taiwan to remain alert.
Taiwan’s military said it monitored the situation and took necessary countermeasures. However, the nature of this “retaliatory action” was not made public. The increase in Chinese naval activities for two consecutive days is a clear indication that Beijing is continuing its policy of pressure. Although these activities are currently “low-intensity”, but if this pattern continues, larger military exercises or more aggressive steps may be seen in the future. For Taiwan, this is not just a question of security, but an issue of survival and identity.
Taiwan–China dispute: history and present
The dispute between Taiwan and China is not new, but its roots go deep in history. China claims that Taiwan is its integral part. This claim is part of its official policy and is repeated from domestic laws to international forums. Taiwan, on the other hand, considers itself a region with a separate identity. It has its own democratic government, army and strong economy. If we look at history, the Qing dynasty captured Taiwan in 1683. After the Sino-Japanese War in 1895, Taiwan came under the control of Japan and remained a Japanese colony for about 50 years. Taiwan returned to Chinese control after World War II, but a formal determination of its sovereignty was never made clear.
Reference #18.490dde17.1778066879.1d7369c8
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.490dde17.1778066879.1d7369c8
Zack Polanski has rejected suggestions that he is “the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics” – while also praising the former Labour leader.
In his Today interview, asked by Nick Robinson how he would avoid becoming the new Corbyn, Polanski replied:
I think me and Jeremy are very different people, and there’s much … you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn.
I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We’ve talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership.
I also think it’s important, speaking for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it’s really clear that antisemitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate crime, is not welcome in the Green party.
Asked if he was ready to be prime minister, Polanski replied:
I’m not ready right now. No. I’ve been leader for eight months, and there’s lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that’s fine. I think I’m a human being. I’m not perfect.
Asked if he might be ready in two years’ time, he replied:
Well, we’ll see in two years time, won’t we? But I’ll certainly be putting in the work.
Key events
The Labour MP David Taylor is one of many people on social media saying that Zack Polanski was wrong when he told the Today programme this morning that it was traumatising seeing the Golders Green suspect being kicked when he was handcuffed. (See 9.33am.) Posting an image from the footage to make his point, Taylor says:
Polanski is at it again – the attacker was not handcuffed, he still had a knife in his hand!
Steve Reed, the housing secretary who has been leading Labour attacks on the Green party during the local elections campaign, also issued this statement responding to the Polanski interview on Today.
Polanski is still refusing to sack candidates who have shared disgusting antisemitic posts despite saying he takes full responsibility for them.
Following the horrific knife attack on two Jewish men in Golders Green he continues to show concern for the suspected attacker. And his response to allegations that he lied about his past job and qualifications shows he simply can’t be trusted.
Labour has criticised Zack Polanski for saying he was concerned about how the suspect in the Golders Green stabbings was treated when he was arrested by the police.
Referring to what Polanski said about this in his Today interview this morning (see 9.33am), a Labour party spokesperson said:
Our brave police ran towards a suspected terrorist and tackled him while he was still carrying a knife and before they could handcuff him.
The fact that Zack Polanski is still sympathising with this individual is utterly astounding. For the Green party leader to be litigating the case for the defence against the police shows whose side he is truly on.
Polanski isn’t serious and he clearly cannot be trusted to protect Britain’s national security.
Pat McFadden, the work and pensions secretary, has also said that the Iran war could lead to job losses in the UK.
In his Sky News interview this morning, he said:
The latest unemployment figures for February showed a fall, interest rates were expected to come down, the markets were pricing in a couple of cuts during the course of the year.
The truth is, with the effect of the Iran war, we can’t count on any of that at the moment. There is likely to be an effect on prices, which feeds through from energy costs, and there may well be labour market implications.
Asked if this meant job losses, McFadden replied: “Yes. It could happen.”
Offenders who commit antisemitic attacks backed by foreign powers such as Iran will face 14 years in prison under legislation to be included in the king’s speech next week. Rajeev Syal has the story.
Pat McFadden, the work and pensions secretary, has said that Keir Starmer would fight any attempt by Labour MPs to replace him after the elections.
In an interview on Sky News this morning, McFadden, who is one of the ministers trusted most by Starmer, said:
I think this country has tested to destruction the idea that the answer to your problems is to swipe left on our prime ministers. We’ve seen too much of that in the past 10 to 15 years. It hasn’t solved our problems. It has added to political chaos and uncertainty that has economic as well as political consequences.
The prime minister was elected for a five-year term, and he should serve out that term. His job is to lead the country through uncertain times, and that’s the job I know he wakes up in the morning and wants to do.
Asked if Starmer would fight any potential leadership challenge after the results are announced, McFadden replied:
Yes. I hope there isn’t [a challenge], because I don’t think it would be the answer to our problems.
I hope we do well tomorrow. But even if we don’t, the day after our job is to wake up, continue with doing our job and serve the country.
At one point a challenge to Starmer after the May elections was seen as highly likely. But, as Pippa Crerar, Jessica Elgot and Peter Walker explain in our overnight story, that is now seen as less likely, in part because “expected challengers including Andy Burnham, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting [are] locked in what one cabinet minister called a ‘Mexican standoff’, with no one ready to move first”.
Zack Polanski has rejected suggestions that he is “the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics” – while also praising the former Labour leader.
In his Today interview, asked by Nick Robinson how he would avoid becoming the new Corbyn, Polanski replied:
I think me and Jeremy are very different people, and there’s much … you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn.
I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We’ve talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership.
I also think it’s important, speaking for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it’s really clear that antisemitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate crime, is not welcome in the Green party.
Asked if he was ready to be prime minister, Polanski replied:
I’m not ready right now. No. I’ve been leader for eight months, and there’s lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that’s fine. I think I’m a human being. I’m not perfect.
Asked if he might be ready in two years’ time, he replied:
Well, we’ll see in two years time, won’t we? But I’ll certainly be putting in the work.

Jakub Krupa writes the Guardian’s Europe live blog.
Poland’s foreign minister, Radosław Sikorski, has warned that Britain would not get a similar deal to its previous EU membership as it pursues a reset in relations with the bloc, warning that British political elites need to “internalise the fundamental European deal” on pooling sovereignty.
“Without that homework, we wouldn’t want you as a member, because you would be unhappy, and we would be unhappy,” he said.
Speaking at a defence conference in Warsaw, he commented at length about Britain’s plans to renegotiate a closer relationship with the EU and regularly appearing comparisons between the UK and Poland.
Well, I’ve declared publicly that if Britain re-applies, Poland will vote in favour. But Britain will not get the same deal that it had before because you had a de facto à la carte membership. You had an opt out from being a member of the Schengen zone. You had an opt out from joining the euro, you had vetoes. You had two important agencies, pharmaceutical and financial services. and so you integrated where it suited your interests, and of course, you had the famous agricultural rebates, negotiations negotiated by the saintly Margaret Thatcher.
You wouldn’t get that kind of deal today, which means that you probably would reject the deal.
I don’t think it makes sense for Britain to apply until you internalise – your political class and beyond – the fundamental European deal that, you get more benefits in return for more pooling of some aspects of sovereignty. If you reject that fundamental deal, you will never be a happy member.
But there is a menu of choices. as regards your relationship with the EU, you can be in the customs union like Turkey. You can be in the single market without being a member like Norway. You can have a Swiss kind of relationship, but every item on the menu has a price in terms of sovereignty, in terms of honouring rules that you didn’t make yourself. And Britain seems unable to to accept that kind of deal.
And first of all, you know, at the time of the referendum … I travelled to Britain often. Not a single member of the British cabinet understood the difference between a free trade area and a single market, because you you didn’t bother to learn how the EU actually worked. And without that homework, we wouldn’t want you as a member because you would, you would be unhappy and we would be unhappy.
Commenting on regular warnings about Poland reportedly catching up with the UK’s economy by 2030, he said:
When I read these stories in the Daily Mail about how even Poland will soon overtake Britain, I become suspicious because I don’t think they are meant out of sympathy. They are meant to humiliate the current British government that even Poland is on track to overtake Britain: not in the standard of living; in GDP per capita. It’s not the same thing.
Zack Polanski has said the Green party will introduce compulsory training to make it clear that antisemitism is “completely unwelcome” in the party.
He was speaking in his Today programme interview when asked about the multiple examples of Green party candidates in the local elections making antisemitic comment. Labour has attacked the Greens relentlessly over this, and today the Daily Mail has splashed on a report accusing 30 Green candidates of antisemitism.
When Nick Robinson quoted some of the worse examples to Polanski, Polanski replied:
Those messages are all unacceptable, and it’s important to condemn that.
The Green party are an anti-racist party, and it’s important that we stick to our values.
When it was put to him that the views of some candidates implied the Greens were not an anti-racist party, Polanski went on:
We’re an anti-racist party. And so what I’ve already committed to doing is making sure that we have a standardised vetting process in future, and also make sure that we have compulsory training of all our candidates to make it clear that antisemitism is completely unwelcome in the Green party, as it is in society.
It’s also important to say one case of antisemitism is one too many.
This is a handful of cases, and actually we have over 4,500 candidates, the vast, vast majority of which are doing amazing work in their communities right now.
Polanski also said this issue was not abstract for him. He is Jewish, and he said two people have been arrested in the past six weeks over threats against him.
Zack Polanski defended the Green party’s proposal to legalise hard drugs in his Today programme interview. He stressed that the policy was “to legalise and regulate, and the regulate is important”.
He told the programme
The war on drugs has clearly failed. It has failed in cities right across this country and more and more people are often taking dangerous drugs.
So, do we want people to buy them on the black market or on street corners? Or do we want people to go to a pharmacy or a medical health professional where, if they have an addiction to dangerous drugs, we can work with them to take a public health approach based on harm reduction?
Polanski said this policy would allow the police to spend more time on other problems.
A lot of police time is spent on stop and search for cannabis use, for instance. It doesn’t escape people’s notice that that is often in the politics of racism. If you’re a young black person, I think it’s something like you’re 18 times more likely to be stopped and searched than your white peer, despite the fact there’s no evidence that they’re more likely to to be dealing or using drugs.
And so I think it’s important that we make sure the police time is spent properly, which I think is about community prevention, about cohesiveness and bringing communities together.
Zack Polanski defended expressing concern about the way the suspect in the Golders Green stabbings was treated when he was arrested last week.
The Green leader has apologised for reposting a social media message implying the police used excessive force during the arrest. He said he should not have raised this issue in that way.
But, when he was interviewed on the Today programme, he said it was important for people to be treated properly, even if they had done horrific things.
When Nick Robinson, the presenter, put it to him that by reposting the controversial tweet, he was implying that he emphathised with the attacker, not the police officers, Polanski said he did not accept that. He said:
My very first response to the attack was to be horrified, as everyone was, I’m sure, and the first thing I posted was solidarity to the victim, to the family, and indeed, to people who are suffering right now.
Polanski said that he was Jewish himself, and that for Jewish people safety was not an “abstract” issue.
He went on:
Two things can be true at the same time: officers are incredibly brave when they run towards scenes of crimes that most people, including myself, will want to run away from.
At the same time, I think it is accurate, and that I was also traumatised by seeing someone handcuffed and repeatedly kicked in the head …
I think the sign of a compassionate society is how we treat people, even people who have done horrific things, because actually the way we do justice in this country is in court.
Good morning. Zack Polanski was largely unknown until he became the Green party leader in September last year and since then, as his party has soared in the polls, there has been intense scrutiny of his pre-politics career. The best-known embarrassing revelation about his past is the fact that he once told a woman he could enlarge her breasts if she listened to his hypnotherapy spiel. Nigel Farage, who also leads a dispruption party enjoying spectacular success, has scandals in his past too, and Polanski’s allies would argue that they are worse. Farage took a £5m donation from a political supporter which he did not declare, he still has not provided as good explanation as to how his partner was able to afford to buy a home in Farage’s Clacton constituency and arguably he told 30 million women that he could enlarge the size of their bank balances if they listened to his spiel on Brexit. Guardian readers can decide for themselves who is more dodgy.
But, as we tell our children, life isn’t fair. And it certainly isn’t fair for leftwing politicians campaigning in an environment where the rightwing media have considerable influence. Polanski discovered that again last night when the Times printed a story with various claims about him, of which the main one related to an allegation about his embellishing his CV. Here is our version by Jessica Elgot.
So it was not hard to guess what the first question would be when Polanski was interviewed by Nick Robinson on the Today programme a few minutes ago.
Asked why Polanski in the past said he was a spokesperson for the British Red Cross when the charity said he wasn’t, Polanski replied:
I hosted various fundraisers for the British Red Cross, and indeed I would go on stage and speak for them about the amazing work they do tackling humanitarian crises, on the climate crisis and indeed for refugees all around the world.
I used the wrong word and I accept that.
But I would essentially take words on stage with me and speak.
It’s important, though, and I accept this, [British Red Cross] don’t support any political party, and I’ve made sure [that claim has] been taken down.
Polanski attacked the Times for publishing what he described as an antisemitic cartoon of him last week. They should apologise for it, he said. And he went on:
It feels some of these stories feel like scraping the barrel to go back 10, 15 years.
I’ve had so many friends – I’m literally talking maybe 20 or 30 in the last few weeks – who have phoned me and said a Times journalist has been phoning and they’ve been desperately trying to find things about your past. They asked me lots of questions and seem disappointed that I didn’t have some juicy, dirty gossip.
There was a lot more in the interview, and I will post more from it soon.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, is campaigning in London.
10am: Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, holds an election rally.
Lunchtime: Rhun ap Iorwerth, the Plaid Cymru leader, is campaigning in Llandudno.
Afternoon: Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, is campaigning in Surrey.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Reference #18.c5d07868.1778065897.172f7a0f
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.c5d07868.1778065897.172f7a0f
Rastegar Capital CEO Ari Rastegar joins ‘Fox News Live’ to discuss Americans leaving blue states for lower taxes and the impact of rising rates on the housing market and supply-side issues, including helium and fertilizer.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
There’s a new playbook in blue state taxation, and it’s not being explained clearly to the people paying the bill.
It’s called the surtax.
And if you think it’s just another tax bracket, you’re already missing the point.
A surtax is a tax layered on top of an existing income tax, not a replacement for it.
In plain English, here’s how it works: You pay your normal state income tax, and then once your income crosses a certain threshold, the state adds an extra percentage on top of that same income.
Surtaxes aren’t just about taxing the rich. They’re about engineering revenue from high-value moments.
It’s the difference between climbing a ladder and having someone add another rung above you just when you think you’ve reached the top and hit success. But why should you be penalized for being successful? It’s anti-capitalist.
States use surtaxes for one simple reason: Targeted revenue without broad backlash.
AMERICANS CONTINUE VOTING WITH THEIR FEET AS HIGH-TAX CITIES STRUGGLE TO RECOVER
Instead of raising taxes on everyone, these states can:
Let’s walk through the five states leading this surtax movement and look at what they’re really doing.
Massachusetts is the cleanest example.
YOUNG PEOPLE PLAN TO LEAVE BOSTON OVER HIGH RENT AND ‘SAFETY’, NEW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SURVEY SHOWS
Base income tax: 5% flat rate. Surtax: 4% on income over about $1 million.
That means income above the threshold is taxed at 9% total.
If you sell a business or have a liquidity event, that extra 4% applies directly to the gain, not your entire income, but everything above the line. What a pleasure to build a business, employ hundreds of people, and then pay even more when you sell it.
CALIFORNIA BILLIONAIRES FLEE STATE’S WEALTH TAX IN THE MOST-PREDICTABLE RESULT EVER
California takes a slightly different approach.
Base top rate: 12.3% Surtax: 1% on income over $1 million
TAX FIGHT PUTS CALIFORNIA ON COLLISION COURSE AS BILLIONAIRES LEAVE FOR RED STATES
That pushes the effective top rate to 13.3%.
This surcharge was originally tied to mental health funding, but make no mistake: It’s a permanent layer for high earners.
‘GONE TO FLORIDA AND TEXAS’: NEW BILLBOARDS SLAM NY, NJ OVER MASSIVE RESIDENT FLIGHT TO RED STATES
New Jersey operates more like a stepped surtax system.
Income over $1 million is taxed at 10.75%.
This isn’t labeled as a “surtax,” but functionally, it acts like one because once you cross the threshold, your marginal tax rate jumps significantly.
FOUR LESSONS WHY THE ‘BOOM BELT’ IS MAKING SUCH A BIG NOISE WITH MIGRATION
It’s effectively a millionaire surcharge baked into the rate structure.
New York has one of the most aggressive systems.
NEW YORK’S HOCHUL DROVE ME TO FLORIDA — NOW SHE’S BEGGING ME TO RETURN. NOT HAPPENING
Top state rate: up to 10.9% on very high incomes Add New York City tax, and top earners can exceed 13% combined.
While technically structured as brackets, the “millionaire tax” functions like a surtax because of how sharply rates rise at the top.
Hawaii flies under the radar, but it shouldn’t.

Aerial view of Kauai, Hawaii sunny day. (iStock)
THE NEXT BIG TAX THREAT IS COMING FROM YOUR STATE CAPITAL
Top rate: around 11%. Recent adjustments added higher brackets for top earners.
It’s not always labeled as a surtax, but the effect is the same: a premium tax layer on higher income levels.
Here’s what doesn’t make the political talking points:
Surtaxes are not just about income. Instead, they’re about timing.
They hit hardest when:
ROTTEN REGULATIONS: EVEN YOUR TRASH CAN’T ESCAPE CALIFORNIA’S RED TAPE
In other words, they target moments of success, not just steady earnings. And if you are successful, you are likely to acquire more property and pay more real estate taxes and consumption taxes where they exist. You can end up keeping barely 50 cents of every dollar you make.
Cross that threshold, and your marginal tax rate jumps fast.
In Massachusetts, that extra 4% can mean:
$40,000 on every additional $1 million and hundreds of thousands, potentially millions, lost on a business exit
And once you stack federal taxes on top, the total tax bite becomes very real.
Surtaxes aren’t just about taxing the rich. They’re about engineering revenue from high-value moments.
They’re precise. They’re targeted. And they’re expanding.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
My advice for all Americans: Be careful that this doesn’t become a path for the federal government in the future.
Because once a state figures out it can quietly add another layer at the top, it’s very hard to take it away.
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia — Theodore, a retired tech entrepreneur in Malaysia, is usually in no rush to book flights for his family’s annual holiday to South Korea and Japan, preferring to take his time to find the best deals.
But this year, the 50-year-old father of three was eager to lock down his travel plans fast amid a surge in jet fuel prices that has led to thousands of flight cancellations worldwide – even if it meant giving up a bargain.
Forgoing his usual choice of a budget airline, he booked seats with Korean Air and Malaysia Airlines last week for August and September, reasoning that the full-service carriers would be less likely to throw his plans into disarray with a last-minute cancellation.
“I saw prices going up, saw budget airlines cancelling flights often, and wanted to avoid any friction later on,” Theodore, who asked to be identified by his first name only, told Al Jazeera.
“It’s a life quality upgrade to reduce friction and mental cycles on issues like this,” said Theodore, who lives in Cyberjaya, about 30km (19 miles) south of Kuala Lumpur.
“And the saying ‘an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure’ applies here in terms of potential travel plan disruptions.”
As the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz approaches the 10-week mark amid an uneasy truce between the United States and Iran, global air travel is emerging as a major casualty of elevated oil prices.
Prices of jet fuel, which is primarily derived from crude oil, have risen more than 80 percent since the US and Israel launched their war on Iran in late February, prompting airlines to hike fares, reduce their schedules, or both.
In the starkest example of the fallout, US-based budget carrier Spirit Airlines on Saturday announced that it would permanently cease operations in a move widely blamed on soaring fuel costs.
Across a wide-ranging list of markets, including the US, China, Japan, Australia, and much of Europe, airlines have cut 9.3 million seats for the period of June 1 to September 30, according to aviation analytics firm Cirium.
Flight reductions have been most pronounced in the Middle East, where aviation is still reeling from airspace closures imposed in response to Iranian attacks on regional hubs such as Dubai and Doha.
Qatar Airways alone slashed two million seats scheduled for June through October, with the United Arab Emirates-based carriers Emirates and Etihad Airways cutting 700,000 and 450,000 seats, respectively, according to Cirium data.
For the scheduled flights, ticket prices are substantially higher in many cases than they were before the war.
The average international airfare from the US — across all destinations — was $1,101 in the last week of April, up 16 percent from the same period last year, according to data from travel-focused search aggregator Kayak.
Domestic fares in the US have risen more steeply, jumping 24 percent year-on-year, according to Kayak.
Hans Jorgen Elnaes, the founder of Norway-based aviation consultancy Winair AS, said he estimates that prices on some routes between Europe and Asia have risen as much as fivefold.
“The current fare levels between Europe and Asia are not sustainable over time in my view – this is driven by high demand and limited capacity, not high jet fuel prices – and I will not be very surprised if the Gulf area airlines will soon be offering very attractive airfares between Europe and Asia via Gulf hubs,” Elnaes told Al Jazeera.
At least so far, rising prices have done little to dampen consumers’ appetite for travel.
While international passenger demand fell 0.6 percent worldwide in March compared with the previous year, overall demand rose more than 2 percent on the back of the strong domestic markets of many countries, according to the International Air Transport Association.
While demand remains strong, the price hikes have prompted some travellers to make early bookings, said Henry Harteveldt, president of Atmosphere Research Group, a market research firm, citing the results of a survey of airline passengers he conducted in March.
“One thing we learned is that uncertainty and fears of even higher fares were causes for action,” Harteveldt told Al Jazeera.
“Eleven percent of all passengers said they had booked flights sooner than expected for upcoming travel between April and August,” he said.

James Mundy, a PR manager at the United Kingdom-based InsideAsia Tours, said that while he has witnessed a “slight drop” in bookings and inquiries as customers assess the situation in the Middle East, demand for Asian destinations remains strong.
“Japan continues to be very popular, but flight costs of direct routes have risen considerably,” Mundy told Al Jazeera.
“There is also a lot of interest in Korea at the moment – still one of the fastest growing destinations for InsideAsia,” Mundy said.
“The cost of a flight hasn’t risen very much and offers very good value compared to some of its neighbours,” he added.
Analysts say travellers’ willingness to swallow higher costs could start to change if fuel supplies remain constrained.
IATA Director General Willie Walsh warned last week that parts of Europe and Asia could see jet fuel shortages in the coming weeks.
“Everybody’s watching what’s happening with jet fuel – both supply and pricing,” Walsh said in a statement.
“So far, the summer is shaping up to be a normally busy time for travel,” Walsh added.
“That’s positive news, but airline resilience is being tested and stabilising the supply and price of fuel is crucial.”
Gary Bowerman, the director of travel-focused marketing company Check-in Asia, said the global aviation industry can expect a “difficult few months” ahead.
“Even if the Strait of Hormuz were to reopen tomorrow, the deep structural damage this war has caused to energy infrastructure and supplies from the Gulf will impact the global airline sector, especially in Europe and Asia, for many months, probably longer,” Bowerman told Al Jazeera.

Harteveldt, president of Atmosphere Research Group, said the outlook for air travel is a “mixed picture”.
Despite surging jet fuel prices, costs remain below the historic peak reached during the 2007-08 global financial crisis, Harteveldt said. On the other hand, a clear end to the war remains out of sight.
“Even when the hostilities do conclude, it may take many months, and possibly even a year, before jet fuel prices return to more normal levels,” Harteveldt said.
“Even when that happens, don’t expect airlines to lower their fares to pre-war levels,” he added.
“One thing airlines have developed better than perhaps any other industry is a keen sense for understanding travellers’ willingness to pay.”