Polanski says he is not ready to be PM now – but suggests he might be in two years’ time
Zack Polanski has rejected suggestions that he is “the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics” – while also praising the former Labour leader.
In his Today interview, asked by Nick Robinson how he would avoid becoming the new Corbyn, Polanski replied:
I think me and Jeremy are very different people, and there’s much … you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn.
I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We’ve talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership.
I also think it’s important, speaking for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it’s really clear that antisemitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate crime, is not welcome in the Green party.
Asked if he was ready to be prime minister, Polanski replied:
I’m not ready right now. No. I’ve been leader for eight months, and there’s lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that’s fine. I think I’m a human being. I’m not perfect.
Asked if he might be ready in two years’ time, he replied:
Well, we’ll see in two years time, won’t we? But I’ll certainly be putting in the work.
Key events
Polanski criticised for wrongly saying Golders Green suspect was handcuffed when kicked during arrest
The Labour MP David Taylor is one of many people on social media saying that Zack Polanski was wrong when he told the Today programme this morning that it was traumatising seeing the Golders Green suspect being kicked when he was handcuffed. (See 9.33am.) Posting an image from the footage to make his point, Taylor says:
Polanski is at it again – the attacker was not handcuffed, he still had a knife in his hand!
Steve Reed, the housing secretary who has been leading Labour attacks on the Green party during the local elections campaign, also issued this statement responding to the Polanski interview on Today.
Polanski is still refusing to sack candidates who have shared disgusting antisemitic posts despite saying he takes full responsibility for them.
Following the horrific knife attack on two Jewish men in Golders Green he continues to show concern for the suspected attacker. And his response to allegations that he lied about his past job and qualifications shows he simply can’t be trusted.
Labour has criticised Zack Polanski for saying he was concerned about how the suspect in the Golders Green stabbings was treated when he was arrested by the police.
Referring to what Polanski said about this in his Today interview this morning (see 9.33am), a Labour party spokesperson said:
Our brave police ran towards a suspected terrorist and tackled him while he was still carrying a knife and before they could handcuff him.
The fact that Zack Polanski is still sympathising with this individual is utterly astounding. For the Green party leader to be litigating the case for the defence against the police shows whose side he is truly on.
Polanski isn’t serious and he clearly cannot be trusted to protect Britain’s national security.
Iran war could lead to job losses in UK, McFadden says
Pat McFadden, the work and pensions secretary, has also said that the Iran war could lead to job losses in the UK.
In his Sky News interview this morning, he said:
The latest unemployment figures for February showed a fall, interest rates were expected to come down, the markets were pricing in a couple of cuts during the course of the year.
The truth is, with the effect of the Iran war, we can’t count on any of that at the moment. There is likely to be an effect on prices, which feeds through from energy costs, and there may well be labour market implications.
Asked if this meant job losses, McFadden replied: “Yes. It could happen.”
Proxies carrying out antisemitic attacks in UK could face 14 years in prison
Offenders who commit antisemitic attacks backed by foreign powers such as Iran will face 14 years in prison under legislation to be included in the king’s speech next week. Rajeev Syal has the story.
Starmer would fight any attempt by Labour MPs to remove him after elections, Pat McFadden says
Pat McFadden, the work and pensions secretary, has said that Keir Starmer would fight any attempt by Labour MPs to replace him after the elections.
In an interview on Sky News this morning, McFadden, who is one of the ministers trusted most by Starmer, said:
I think this country has tested to destruction the idea that the answer to your problems is to swipe left on our prime ministers. We’ve seen too much of that in the past 10 to 15 years. It hasn’t solved our problems. It has added to political chaos and uncertainty that has economic as well as political consequences.
The prime minister was elected for a five-year term, and he should serve out that term. His job is to lead the country through uncertain times, and that’s the job I know he wakes up in the morning and wants to do.
Asked if Starmer would fight any potential leadership challenge after the results are announced, McFadden replied:
Yes. I hope there isn’t [a challenge], because I don’t think it would be the answer to our problems.
I hope we do well tomorrow. But even if we don’t, the day after our job is to wake up, continue with doing our job and serve the country.
At one point a challenge to Starmer after the May elections was seen as highly likely. But, as Pippa Crerar, Jessica Elgot and Peter Walker explain in our overnight story, that is now seen as less likely, in part because “expected challengers including Andy Burnham, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting [are] locked in what one cabinet minister called a ‘Mexican standoff’, with no one ready to move first”.
Polanski says he is not ready to be PM now – but suggests he might be in two years’ time
Zack Polanski has rejected suggestions that he is “the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics” – while also praising the former Labour leader.
In his Today interview, asked by Nick Robinson how he would avoid becoming the new Corbyn, Polanski replied:
I think me and Jeremy are very different people, and there’s much … you know, the question was almost inviting me to condemn Jeremy Corbyn.
I think there was lots that Jeremy Corbyn was putting forward to this country that I think was really positive. We’ve talked about wealth taxes, about public ownership.
I also think it’s important, speaking for myself right now, that we make sure that we have this vetting process, that it’s really clear that antisemitism, Islamophobia, any form of hatred or hate crime, is not welcome in the Green party.
Asked if he was ready to be prime minister, Polanski replied:
I’m not ready right now. No. I’ve been leader for eight months, and there’s lots of skills and lots of knowledge to get, and I think that’s fine. I think I’m a human being. I’m not perfect.
Asked if he might be ready in two years’ time, he replied:
Well, we’ll see in two years time, won’t we? But I’ll certainly be putting in the work.
UK should not try rejoining EU until it accepts it won’t get special à la carte deal it had before, Polish foreign minister says
Jakub Krupa writes the Guardian’s Europe live blog.
Poland’s foreign minister, Radosław Sikorski, has warned that Britain would not get a similar deal to its previous EU membership as it pursues a reset in relations with the bloc, warning that British political elites need to “internalise the fundamental European deal” on pooling sovereignty.
“Without that homework, we wouldn’t want you as a member, because you would be unhappy, and we would be unhappy,” he said.
Speaking at a defence conference in Warsaw, he commented at length about Britain’s plans to renegotiate a closer relationship with the EU and regularly appearing comparisons between the UK and Poland.
Well, I’ve declared publicly that if Britain re-applies, Poland will vote in favour. But Britain will not get the same deal that it had before because you had a de facto à la carte membership. You had an opt out from being a member of the Schengen zone. You had an opt out from joining the euro, you had vetoes. You had two important agencies, pharmaceutical and financial services. and so you integrated where it suited your interests, and of course, you had the famous agricultural rebates, negotiations negotiated by the saintly Margaret Thatcher.
You wouldn’t get that kind of deal today, which means that you probably would reject the deal.
I don’t think it makes sense for Britain to apply until you internalise – your political class and beyond – the fundamental European deal that, you get more benefits in return for more pooling of some aspects of sovereignty. If you reject that fundamental deal, you will never be a happy member.
But there is a menu of choices. as regards your relationship with the EU, you can be in the customs union like Turkey. You can be in the single market without being a member like Norway. You can have a Swiss kind of relationship, but every item on the menu has a price in terms of sovereignty, in terms of honouring rules that you didn’t make yourself. And Britain seems unable to to accept that kind of deal.
And first of all, you know, at the time of the referendum … I travelled to Britain often. Not a single member of the British cabinet understood the difference between a free trade area and a single market, because you you didn’t bother to learn how the EU actually worked. And without that homework, we wouldn’t want you as a member because you would, you would be unhappy and we would be unhappy.
Commenting on regular warnings about Poland reportedly catching up with the UK’s economy by 2030, he said:
When I read these stories in the Daily Mail about how even Poland will soon overtake Britain, I become suspicious because I don’t think they are meant out of sympathy. They are meant to humiliate the current British government that even Poland is on track to overtake Britain: not in the standard of living; in GDP per capita. It’s not the same thing.
Polanski claims only ‘handful’ of antisemitism cases amongst Green candidates – but vetting and training to be beefed up
Zack Polanski has said the Green party will introduce compulsory training to make it clear that antisemitism is “completely unwelcome” in the party.
He was speaking in his Today programme interview when asked about the multiple examples of Green party candidates in the local elections making antisemitic comment. Labour has attacked the Greens relentlessly over this, and today the Daily Mail has splashed on a report accusing 30 Green candidates of antisemitism.
When Nick Robinson quoted some of the worse examples to Polanski, Polanski replied:
Those messages are all unacceptable, and it’s important to condemn that.
The Green party are an anti-racist party, and it’s important that we stick to our values.
When it was put to him that the views of some candidates implied the Greens were not an anti-racist party, Polanski went on:
We’re an anti-racist party. And so what I’ve already committed to doing is making sure that we have a standardised vetting process in future, and also make sure that we have compulsory training of all our candidates to make it clear that antisemitism is completely unwelcome in the Green party, as it is in society.
It’s also important to say one case of antisemitism is one too many.
This is a handful of cases, and actually we have over 4,500 candidates, the vast, vast majority of which are doing amazing work in their communities right now.
Polanski also said this issue was not abstract for him. He is Jewish, and he said two people have been arrested in the past six weeks over threats against him.
Polanski defends Green party’s policy to ‘legalise and regulate’ hard drugs, saying ‘the regulate is important’
Zack Polanski defended the Green party’s proposal to legalise hard drugs in his Today programme interview. He stressed that the policy was “to legalise and regulate, and the regulate is important”.
He told the programme
The war on drugs has clearly failed. It has failed in cities right across this country and more and more people are often taking dangerous drugs.
So, do we want people to buy them on the black market or on street corners? Or do we want people to go to a pharmacy or a medical health professional where, if they have an addiction to dangerous drugs, we can work with them to take a public health approach based on harm reduction?
Polanski said this policy would allow the police to spend more time on other problems.
A lot of police time is spent on stop and search for cannabis use, for instance. It doesn’t escape people’s notice that that is often in the politics of racism. If you’re a young black person, I think it’s something like you’re 18 times more likely to be stopped and searched than your white peer, despite the fact there’s no evidence that they’re more likely to to be dealing or using drugs.
And so I think it’s important that we make sure the police time is spent properly, which I think is about community prevention, about cohesiveness and bringing communities together.
Polanski defends being concerned about how suspect in Golders Green attack was treated by police
Zack Polanski defended expressing concern about the way the suspect in the Golders Green stabbings was treated when he was arrested last week.
The Green leader has apologised for reposting a social media message implying the police used excessive force during the arrest. He said he should not have raised this issue in that way.
But, when he was interviewed on the Today programme, he said it was important for people to be treated properly, even if they had done horrific things.
When Nick Robinson, the presenter, put it to him that by reposting the controversial tweet, he was implying that he emphathised with the attacker, not the police officers, Polanski said he did not accept that. He said:
My very first response to the attack was to be horrified, as everyone was, I’m sure, and the first thing I posted was solidarity to the victim, to the family, and indeed, to people who are suffering right now.
Polanski said that he was Jewish himself, and that for Jewish people safety was not an “abstract” issue.
He went on:
Two things can be true at the same time: officers are incredibly brave when they run towards scenes of crimes that most people, including myself, will want to run away from.
At the same time, I think it is accurate, and that I was also traumatised by seeing someone handcuffed and repeatedly kicked in the head …
I think the sign of a compassionate society is how we treat people, even people who have done horrific things, because actually the way we do justice in this country is in court.
Polanski accuses Times of ‘scraping the barrel’ over his claim to be charity spokesperson, saying he just ‘used wrong word’
Good morning. Zack Polanski was largely unknown until he became the Green party leader in September last year and since then, as his party has soared in the polls, there has been intense scrutiny of his pre-politics career. The best-known embarrassing revelation about his past is the fact that he once told a woman he could enlarge her breasts if she listened to his hypnotherapy spiel. Nigel Farage, who also leads a dispruption party enjoying spectacular success, has scandals in his past too, and Polanski’s allies would argue that they are worse. Farage took a £5m donation from a political supporter which he did not declare, he still has not provided as good explanation as to how his partner was able to afford to buy a home in Farage’s Clacton constituency and arguably he told 30 million women that he could enlarge the size of their bank balances if they listened to his spiel on Brexit. Guardian readers can decide for themselves who is more dodgy.
But, as we tell our children, life isn’t fair. And it certainly isn’t fair for leftwing politicians campaigning in an environment where the rightwing media have considerable influence. Polanski discovered that again last night when the Times printed a story with various claims about him, of which the main one related to an allegation about his embellishing his CV. Here is our version by Jessica Elgot.
So it was not hard to guess what the first question would be when Polanski was interviewed by Nick Robinson on the Today programme a few minutes ago.
Asked why Polanski in the past said he was a spokesperson for the British Red Cross when the charity said he wasn’t, Polanski replied:
I hosted various fundraisers for the British Red Cross, and indeed I would go on stage and speak for them about the amazing work they do tackling humanitarian crises, on the climate crisis and indeed for refugees all around the world.
I used the wrong word and I accept that.
But I would essentially take words on stage with me and speak.
It’s important, though, and I accept this, [British Red Cross] don’t support any political party, and I’ve made sure [that claim has] been taken down.
Polanski attacked the Times for publishing what he described as an antisemitic cartoon of him last week. They should apologise for it, he said. And he went on:
It feels some of these stories feel like scraping the barrel to go back 10, 15 years.
I’ve had so many friends – I’m literally talking maybe 20 or 30 in the last few weeks – who have phoned me and said a Times journalist has been phoning and they’ve been desperately trying to find things about your past. They asked me lots of questions and seem disappointed that I didn’t have some juicy, dirty gossip.
There was a lot more in the interview, and I will post more from it soon.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, is campaigning in London.
10am: Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, holds an election rally.
Lunchtime: Rhun ap Iorwerth, the Plaid Cymru leader, is campaigning in Llandudno.
Afternoon: Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, is campaigning in Surrey.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Source link
