‘May your village burn’: Israeli Flag March returns to East Jerusalem | Israel-Palestine conflict News

0

Uri Weltmann was tense. He’s the national field director for Standing Together, an organisation of Jewish and Palestinian peace activists, who had gathered to resist the tens of thousands of far-right Jewish marchers heading for occupied East Jerusalem’s Old City.

He had reason to be worried. ‘Jerusalem Day’, marked by Jewish Israelis every year to celebrate the 1967 capture and subsequent illegal occupation of the city, has become an opportunity for thousands to be bussed in from across Israel and the occupied West Bank to participate in the ‘Flag March’, where they maraud through the Old City and attack Palestinians – as well as Jewish peace activists. Palestinians from outside the Old City were not allowed in by police.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

This year’s event on Thursday saw fighting break out even before the march officially began, as ultranationalist Israelis – many of them young teenagers – attacked Palestinians in the Christian Quarter. The Israelis vandalised property, and Israeli police forced Palestinian shop owners to close.

Many other Palestinian businesses had already closed for the day, fearing attacks and harassment.

“It’s gotten much more extreme since October 7,” said Weltmann, referring to the Hamas-led attack on Israel in 2023, which led to Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

Weltmann and approximately 200 other Standing Together activists, wearing purple vests, attempted to stand between the far-right Jewish marchers and Palestinians, but were often attacked themselves.

As in previous years, the marchers shouted anti-Palestinian slogans, including ‘May your village burn’ and ‘Death to Arabs’. They have also been filmed spitting and hurling insults at Palestinians.

Police have so far arrested 13 people, including both Jews and Palestinians.

The ultranationalist marchers have the full support of the Israeli government. Earlier in the day, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir led a large group of Jewish Israelis into the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, where he displayed the Israeli flag in front of the Dome of the Rock.

Jordan condemned Ben-Gvir’s stunt, with the Foreign Ministry calling it a “blatant violation of international law, an unacceptable provocation, and a flagrant breach of the historical and legal status quo”.

Jordan runs the Jerusalem Waqf Department, which supervises the holy sites in occupied East Jerusalem, according to a long-standing agreement. Palestinians want East Jerusalem to be the capital of any future Palestinian state.

Violent society

Last year, hordes of far-right and ultra-Orthodox marchers flooded into the city, attacking Palestinians and chanting racist slogans. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz described the event as a state-sanctioned invitation for ultranationalist groups to enter the Muslim Quarter, smashing shop signs, breaking locks, battering metal doors with flagpoles and plastering racist stickers across large parts of the Old City.

Weltmann said that the violence and anti-Palestinian rhetoric that characterised ‘Jerusalem Day’ had already been increasing in tandem with the growth of the far-right ultranationalist movement in Israel pre-2023.

Fuelling much of the violence, Weltmann said, was a police force overseen by Ben-Gvir, whose responsibility for policing the events has often run counter to his active participation in it.

 

The Religious Zionism movement, which has drawn in much of Israel’s far-right, has been steadily increasing since Israel’s disengagement from Gaza in 2005, when many in Israel’s settler community first began to feel that the land captured in 1967 – Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights – may be under threat, analysts told Al Jazeera.

They describe how the Religious Zionist trend has since been adopted and exploited by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his avowedly pro-settler Likud party to wield power and, in the wake of the October 7 attack, underpin its genocidal war on Gaza, killing more than 72,000 Palestinians.

Under the watch of Netanyahu and his far-right Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, the number of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank has surged. The self-styled ‘Hilltop Youth‘, a loosely organised network of radical and violent young settlers, have also grown in both visibility and apparent impunity, while settler violence – which has long been a characteristic of Israel’s presence in the occupied West Bank – has exploded.

a man in a suit smiles in a crowd
Israeli Minister of National Security and far-right politician Itamar Ben-Gvir, surrounded by Israeli policemen, waves to other right-wing activists at last year’s Flag March [Ahmad Gharabli/AFP]

“There’s a deeply confrontational element to the march,” researcher on Jewish-Arab relations, Eram Tzidkiyahu, said, “It’s not enough for us to celebrate our own victories. It’s about celebrating our victories in the living rooms of the people who lost. Celebrating on your own just doesn’t have the same baggage. It’s about going and chanting from the prayer book, affirming that you are the chosen people, deliberately within the Muslim Quarter [of the Old City].”

“The violence is inherent to that, fuelled by hormonal young men seeking confrontation and united in their absolute rejection of the ‘other’,” he said. “This didn’t start on October 7. It’s deeply rooted into it.”

Passive police

Israeli police have often done little to prevent attacks on Palestinians during the Flag March, and few Jewish Israelis have been punished for the many crimes committed.

“The so-called Flag March … has always been a violent event,” said Ofer Cassif of the left-wing Hadash party, adding that it became more violent in the past few years, especially since October 7.

Cassif accused Netanyahu’s “fascist” government of encouraging the violence.

The Israeli police, which Cassif describes as Ben-Gvir’s “private militia”, did not stop “the violence, the lynchings, the destruction of shops, the aggression and attacks against Palestinians in the Old City, and throughout the city as a whole”.

Israeli youth carrying Israeli flags gather outside Jerusalem's Old City walls before a march marking Jerusalem Day, an Israeli holiday celebrating the capture of east Jerusalem in the 1967 Mideast war, in Jerusalem, Thursday, May 14, 2026. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg)
Young Israelis gather outside Jerusalem’s Old City walls before a march marking Israel’s capture of East Jerusalem in 1967 [File: Ohad Zwigenberg/AP]

However, while it was easy for elements within Israeli society to regard the presence of Ben-Gvir, or the violence of the Flag March itself as somehow exceptional, to do so was to miss the point, observers said, particularly in light of the wars on Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran.

“It’s easy to dismiss Ben-Gvir as a clown,” said Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher at the Ir Amim activist group. “Many Israeli liberals do this to feel better about themselves. It’s easy. They don’t want to recognise that this is part of Israeli society and, as long as they don’t feel confident enough to say in public that, yes, Palestinians do have rights, they’re part of that, too.

“Ben-Gvir is not a clown. He’s Israel: 2026,”  Tatarsky continued. “He’s part of a government and society that, despite wars with Iran and Lebanon, still prioritises the removal of Palestinians wherever they may be above everything else.”



Source link

Access Denied



Access Denied You don’t have permission to access “http://news.sky.com/story/sadistic-killer-who-filmed-dying-victim-jailed-for-barbaric-murder-13543992” on this server.

Reference #18.8e644217.1778781743.ad88df5

https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.8e644217.1778781743.ad88df5



Source link

Wisconsin official says FBI agent visited election director at her home


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A county clerk in Wisconsin claims that a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent attempted to interview a county election director at her residence and released a statement defending the state’s handling of the 2020 presidential election. 

“I can confirm that a representative of the Federal Bureau of Investigation visited the home of my Elections Director and left her business card,” Milwaukee County Clerk George Christenson said in a statement on Thursday morning. 

“We will be following up to determine the nature of this visit. It is unfortunate that the FBI chose to visit the private residence of Milwaukee County’s Elections Director rather than contact the Election Commission’s office directly. No dedicated public servant should be subjected to that type of intrusion simply for carrying out her responsibilities with integrity and professionalism.”

Christenson went on to defend the state’s handling of the 2020 presidential election as “fair and transparent” and said “this has been proven repeatedly over the last six years by the post-election canvass, the Presidential Election Recount, State court-based challenge, Federal court-based challenge, the forensic audit by the Wisconsin’s Legislative Audit Bureau, and two additional independent audits. Continuing to relitigate settled questions does not strengthen public confidence in elections but it undermines it.”

DOJ TAUNTS MEDIA AFTER TRUMP SCORES WIN IN BATTLEGROUND-STATE BALLOT FIGHT

FBI agents standing in Washington, D.C.

An FBI agent and a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer arrest a man near the White House at Farragut Square Path in Washington, D.C., United States, on Sept. 15, 2025. (Photo by Yasin Ozturk /Anadolu via Getty Images)

“While we cooperate with all legitimate law enforcement actions, we will defend against any attack on our democracy and will defend the rights of voters of Milwaukee County,” Christenson wrote. “Our responsibility as election officials is to safeguard the integrity of the process through facts, transparency, and adherence to the law, and the record clearly demonstrates that those standards were met in 2020.”

Christenson went on to suggest the FBI’s actions are an “attack on democracy.”

TRUMP ACCUSES SCHUMER OF TRYING TO ‘INTERFERE IN OUR ELECTIONS’ WITH LATEST STRATEGY

The FBI declined to comment.

Milwaukee County, the largest county in the state, has been a target of conservatives alleging improprieties with the 2020 election, and the FBI has been active across the country investigating election integrity issues.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

FBI Director Kash Patel speaks at DOJ press conference on indictment.

FBI Director Kash Patel spoke during a press conference at the Department of Justice on April 21, 2026. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

In January, searched Fulton County Georgia’s main election facility in Union City, near Atlanta, and focused on records connected to the 2020 general election after obtaining a court-approved search warrant, Fox Atlanta reported.

An underlying affidavit revealed the bureau was probing allegations of ballot irregularities and record-keeping failures in Georgia, a state President Donald Trump lost by a razor-thin margin to President Joe Biden that became ground zero for Trump’s election fraud claims in the aftermath of 2020.

In March, the FBI subpoenaed 2020 voting documents in Arizona. Multiple U.S. officials confirmed the election probe to Fox News, saying the DOJ is looking at a large tranche of Arizona data from 2020 and 2024.

Fox News Digital’s Louis Casiano contributed to this report.



Source link

One dead and two more ill after meningitis outbreak in Berkshire | Meningitis

0

One person has died and two more are being treated after an outbreak of meningitis in Berkshire, health officials have said.

It follows a major outbreak in Kent, linked to a Canterbury nightclub, that killed two people and left more than a dozen others needing hospital treatment in March. On Thursday, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) confirmed new cases had been found in Reading, and that a student had died.

“We understand that many people will be affected by this sad news and would like to offer our condolences to the friends and family of this student,” said Dr Rachel Mearkle, consultant in health protection.

“Students and staff will naturally be feeling worried about the likelihood of further cases. However, meningococcal meningitis requires very close contact to spread and large outbreaks, as we saw in Kent recently, are thankfully rare.

“We are working closely with partners and have provided public health advice and precautionary antibiotic treatment to close contacts of the cases. Meningococcal disease does not spread easily and the risk to the wider public remains low.”

More to follow …



Source link

Bessent credits Fetterman with putting country over party in Warsh vote


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., prioritized the nation over partisanship on Wednesday by joining with Senate Republicans in voting to confirm President Donald Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh to serve as Federal Reserve System Board of Governors chair.

Aside from Fetterman, the 54-45 vote was strictly along party lines, with Republicans voting for confirmation and Democrats voting against it.

“Today @SenateGOP, along with the Democrat who put country before political ideology, confirmed @POTUS’s nominee Kevin Warsh as the next Chairman of the @FederalReserve,” Bessent declared in a Wednesday post on X.

SENATE CONFIRMS KEVIN WARSH AS FED CHAIR AS TRUMP’S ECONOMIC VISION COMES INTO FOCUS

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

U.S. Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent testifies during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government hearing on “proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2027 for the Department of the Treasury” on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on April 22, 2026. (SAUL LOEB / AFP via Getty Images)

“Chairman Warsh will usher in a new day at an institution that is in need of accountability, sound policy guidance, and the renewed sense of purpose to help guide our economy. His chairmanship opens the door and lays the groundwork for every American family to build and grow in the world’s greatest economy,” Bessent added.

Fetterman said in a statement issued on Wednesday, “I’ve met Kevin Warsh and believe he will be transparent and responsive to Congress and the public. His promise to maintain Fed independence in setting interest rates is crucial and I look forward to working with him.”

“I also maintain we owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Chair Powell. Through multiple administrations and a global pandemic, our economy has been the envy of the world under his steady hand. He never broke the law, has done a remarkable job, and I’m profoundly grateful for his service as Chair. I encourage him to stay on the Fed Board as long as he wants,” Fetterman added.

FETTERMAN CALLS OUT ‘ABSOLUTE SOCIALIST’ SEATTLE MAYOR AND ‘AVOWED COMMUNIST’ GRAHAM PLATNER

Sen. John Fetterman

U.S. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., speaks to reporters outside the Senate Chamber during votes on Nov. 10, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

During his first presidential administration, Trump nominated Powell for the chairmanship. Then, President Joe Biden, during his White House tenure, tapped Powell to remain in the role for a second term.

Trump more recently has been a vociferous Powell critic.

“After my term as Chair ends on May 15, I will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined. I plan to keep a low profile as a governor. There is only ever one Chair of the Federal Reserve Board. When Kevin Warsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that Chair,” Powell said last month.

POWELL WILL REMAIN AT THE FED FOR NOW, SETTING UP POTENTIAL CLASH WITH TRUMP

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Federal Reserve website notes that “Mr. Powell has served as a member of the Board of Governors since taking office on May 25, 2012, to fill an unexpired term. He was reappointed to the Board and sworn in on June 16, 2014, for a term ending January 31, 2028.”



Source link

US southern states rush to redraw electoral maps to dilute Black voting power | US voting rights

0

US southern states are rushing to redraw congressional maps to eliminate Democratic districts and dilute the influence of Black voters in electing candidates, a bare-knuckled blitz occurring even in some states where voting in congressional primaries has begun, and prompted by the US supreme court’s decision gutting section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Tennessee Republicans have already enacted a new map, carving up the majority Black city of Memphis into three different congressional districts to get rid of the state’s lone Democrat in Congress. Louisiana, the state at the center of the supreme court’s Voting Rights Act decision, is on the brink of implementing a new map that would eliminate the seat of one of the state’s two Black Democrats in Congress. Alabama has successfully petitioned the US supreme court to allow it to eliminate a district currently represented by a Black Democrat. Instead, it will use a map this cycle that a court previously ruled was intentionally drawn to discriminate against Black voters.

In South Carolina, the Republican governor is reportedly poised to call a special session to draw a new congressional map to eliminate the district currently held by Jim Clyburn, the powerful Black House Democrat. Republican lawmakers had previously rejected an effort to move forward with such a plan.

State representatives look over a proposed congressional map during a meeting at the South Carolina state capitol in Columbia, South Carolina, on 8 May 2026. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images

Georgia and Mississippi have opted against redrawing districts ahead of midterm elections this year, though they are likely to redraw ahead of the 2028 elections. States like Texas, Missouri, Florida and North Carolina, which already redrew their maps to add Republican districts, could also draw maps again before 2028 elections.

“This is a five-alarm fire for Black representation in the south,” said Michael Li, a redistricting expert at the Brennan Center for Justice. “The [supreme] court has signaled it’s going to be a redistricting wild west, and there will be no sheriff around.”

States have been ruthlessly aggressive in their push to redraw districts, with Alabama and Louisiana taking the unprecedented steps of cancelling primary elections after voting was under way. “Those ballots are discarded and those voters will vote again in November,” Louisiana governor Jeff Landry, a Republican, said during an interview on 60 Minutes. More than 42,000 ballots were cast in Louisiana before the governor cancelled the election.

“If anybody has a grievance, take it to the United States supreme court,” Landry said.

The Congressional Black Caucus, which has an all time high 58-members, is preparing for a potential decimation of its ranks. Democrats are reportedly mulling a counteroffensive for the 2028 elections in states where they control statehouses – New York, Illinois, Maryland, Colorado, Washington, and Oregon – though they face more hurdles than Republicans do to overcome state-imposed restrictions on partisan gerrymandering.

Hakeem Jeffries speaks at a press conference with other members of the Congressional Black Caucus at the US Capitol in Washington DC on 29 April 2026. Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

After the loss of section 2, different groups are beginning to test how far the supreme court’s decision extends. The American Civil Liberties Union sued Tennessee over its new map this week, seeking to invalidate the map on constitutional grounds. Civil rights groups have also asked a federal court in Alabama to block the state from using the 2023 map after it was found to have intentionally discriminated against Black voters.

A conservative legal organization has also cited the Callais decision as a basis to challenge the Illinois voting rights act, the first case testing whether the supreme court’s decision in the case can also be used to weaken state-level voting rights acts.

Having lawmakers cancel elections in which votes have been cast, absent a natural disaster or other kind of emergency, is unprecedented, election experts said.

“It’s not rolling things back to where they were in 2010. It’s rolling things back to where they were in 1975,” said Stuart Naifeh, a lawyer with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. “The risk is that Black representation will disappear from the south and potentially other places too. And Latino representation as well.”

The chaotic redrawing process has in large part been facilitated by the supreme court itself. For decades, the court has abided by a principle that federal courts should not intervene and disrupt the status quo of an election that is near, let alone one that is under way. In case after case in recent years, the supreme court has blocked orders from lower courts striking down maps because it said an election was near. In many of those cases, the election was months away.

In December, for example, the justices blocked a lower court order striking down Texas’s congressional map as racially discriminatory. In its 4 December order, the court said that it was too close to Texas’s March primary elections to require the state to impose a new map. “The District Court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections,” the court’s conservative majority wrote.

In February 2022, the court similarly ruled it was too late for Alabama to implement a new congressional map before its May primary.

Supreme court justices John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett during a State of the Union address at the US Capitol in Washington DC on 24 February 2026. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images

“When an election is close at hand, the rules of the road must be clear and settled,” Brett Kavanaugh, a supreme court justice, wrote at the time. “Late judicial tinkering with election laws can lead to disruption and to unanticipated and unfair consequences for candidates, political parties, and voters, among others. It is one thing for a State on its own to toy with its election laws close to a State’s elections. But it is quite another thing for a federal court to swoop in and re-do a State’s election laws in the period close to an election.”

Because of those decisions in prior cases, the court faced criticism on Monday for abandoning that approach and allowing Alabama to implement a new map a little more than a week before a congressional primary that was scheduled for 19 May (the state has since rescheduled it). The court offered no public explanation for why it was intervening to allow Alabama to implement new maps now, but had previously halted efforts to get legal maps in place months ahead of an election.

“You don’t need a law degree to see how inconsistently the court is behaving in these cases,” said Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown University. “Consistency is bad enough, but now you have a court that has shown itself willing to step in, even when it knows the result of it stepping in is that votes are going to be thrown out.”



Source link

Doctor accuses young ex-mistress of sending nudes to wife after affair, proposed partner swap & celeb cheating


Buckle up. Last week I was, as I admitted, dragging heading into Thursday and needed more caffeine than normal to get going. There’s no such problem with that today. The sun is out and I can taste the weekend.

Plus, the problem with modern dating has been discovered. If that doesn’t excite you, nothing will. Thankfully, I haven’t been in the game for many, many years now, but it’s good to finally have some answers for those still looking for “the one.”

Who better to set the tone for this week’s True Romance and give people the answers they’ve been looking for than Chelsea Handler? When a relationship expert speaks, we listen around here.

True Romance is a weekly column that goes wherever the romance takes it.

True Romance is a weekly column that goes wherever the romance takes it. (Getty)

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

According to the 51-year-old comedian, men are the problem. She said, “It’s very hard in today’s world to meet straight guys that have their s— together. … Something’s wrong. I don’t know what’s wrong.”

She had put on a superhero cape and attempted to help women find quality men, but says dating apps and social media ruined that. Men have so many choices that they don’t have to “lock it in.”

The badass ladies out there can’t find anyone. Handler said of the men, “They can swipe through 50 women a day. So they’re not making the effort that people used to make to date.”

How did she do it?

If she’s out there trying to set women up with quality men, then she must have a success story of her own, right? What are we talking, one or two decades of a successful relationship under her belt?

That’s not for Chelsea. According to her, she wouldn’t say that she’s in a relationship. She’s “dabbling in different areas,” because she doesn’t “like to be tethered to one person.”

If only we can get those guys who aren’t locking it in to figure it out.

Maybe one day that will happen. Until then, we have other pressing matters to get to, like the doctor who is claiming his ex-mistress sent his wife nudes and a partner swap proposal that could have other motivations behind it.

Once we get through that, we have some serious business in the form of a hypothetical poll about cheating with a married celebrity to take care of.

Go follow True Romance on Twitter and Facebook. Send your emails here sean.joseph@outkick.com (anonymously if you prefer) and find me on Instagram and Twitter.

A doctor accuses his much younger ex-mistress of sending his wife nudes after their affair ended

A “prominent gastroenterologist,” as the NY Post describes him, is alleging in a lawsuit filed in the Manhattan Supreme Court that his much younger ex-mistress sent naked pictures to his wife after their affair ended.

The 57-year-old New Jersey doctor, who The Post names, but isn’t named in the lawsuit, claims that he’s being relentlessly harassed by a 29-year-old woman who he had an affair with.

She was reportedly upset that he had ended the relationship and allegedly started threatening to send naked recordings of him to his family. Now, if naked recordings of him with his former mistress exist, that’s a mistake you just can’t make.

A doctor has alleged in a lawsuit that his ex-mistress sent an explicit picture of him to his wife.

A horizontal view depicts a woman expressing jealousy in a relationship. (Getty)

The lawsuit alleges that the ex-mistress did end up sending an explicit picture of the doctor to his wife while threatening to send images to his college-age sons. These intimate pictures were supposed to remain private.

She was reportedly arrested on stalking, harassment, two counts of aggravated harassment and unlawful disclosure of intimate images. She has denied those claims and pleaded not guilty.

In addition to all of that, she also, according to the suit, dragged the affair onto LinkedIn and damaged the doctor’s career.

The affair went south when the mistress found out she was in a relationship with a married man. He ended up filing for divorce, but the proceedings were halted a few months later.

The former mistress claims she was showered with gifts and even provided with a furnished apartment during their relationship. But this wasn’t a sugar baby situation. She thought he might be the one.

The court system will have to sort out the mess here, but there are some tough lessons to be learned from following your heart down a path that leaves you in a spot where nudes are allegedly flying around.

You could say don’t cheat, but that’s easier said than done for some. The easier step to take would be to not let your mistress take pictures of you at all, especially not without any clothes on.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK CULTURE COVERAGE

This Week In True Romance

Follow True Romance on Twitter and Facebook.

The partner swap proposal to “shake things up”

I hear terms thrown around like “partner swap” and think to myself, how does that work and what could possibly go wrong? On paper, they look like a disaster waiting to happen.

But it has to work out for a few people out there, right? You would think a couple who are swingers and get down with neighbors, old friends and strangers would be able to handle it.

The girlfriend isn’t so sure. Right out of the gate she feels like she’s coming out on the short end of the proposed partner swap. Her boyfriend wants to “shake things up” for the summer.

A woman's boyfriend suggests that they spice up their boring swinging lifestyle by doing a partner swap with neighbors.

Four friends enjoy drinks together at a nightclub. (Getty)

The swinging with the neighbors, old friends and strangers isn’t cutting it. He thinks they’ve become set in their ways and complacent. You can’t have that. He’s come up with a solution to their predicament.

“He wants to go and live with a like-minded neighbor for three months, while her husband comes here,” she told the Daily Star. “He says we can still meet up for group sex whenever we fancy but thinks it will be thrilling to wake up next to someone new for a while.”

That would shake things up, but is there something else going on here? She isn’t into the other guy. He’s annoying and goes at it “like a pneumatic drill.” His wife says he “can go five times a night.”

She’s not thrilled about the prospects of that, and she’s a little worried. Her boyfriend and the pneumatic drill’s wife are into each other. She says they have “an undeniable spark and attraction.”

Again, what could possibly go wrong? So your boyfriend wants to live with someone else for a few months. So there’s a spark and attraction between them. This isn’t a test run on life with this other woman.

It’s nothing more than a loving couple shaking things up for summer. It could be fun. Who knows, maybe the girlfriend and the pneumatic drill end up finding something special.

Your celebrity crush asks you to sleep with them, but they’re married, and you know no one will ever find out. Would you do it anyway? and why?

Let’s take a dive into the deep end of delusion for a minute. Your celebrity crush wants you to jump into bed with them, but they’re married.

The good news is that nobody is ever going to find out. Are you, assuming your celebrity crush is still alive, taking them up on the offer?

Here’s what some people on Reddit who allowed themselves to live in fantasy land for a minute had to say:

  • I would but Rue McClanahan died in 2010. RIP Blanche
  • Do you not have a laminated celebrity “freebie” card?
  • They may be willing to cheat on their spouse, but that doesn’t mean I am.
  • Yeah, I’m not on some moral high horse.
  • Mike Vrabel has entered the chat.
  • Nah, my dreams of us are probably better anyway – cheating? Nope, thank you
  • Yes. Full stop. Sorry Mrs. Clooney.
  • Sydney Sweeney, the most disappointing 2-minutes of her life. Let’s GO!
  • Im single. Im in. Theyre the cheater not me.
  • No, I can’t cheat or homewreck, I just can’t bring myself to.
  • They’re rich enough to get over it
  • Only if I could take my wife…
  • Yes, it’s Cindy Crawford. Are you crazy?
  • Hands down yes. Not my marriage I’m screwing up.
  • I would assume that I am their hallpass, and my spouse would say I’m crazy to not take this once in a life time chance.
  • Eh I think Colin Jost would understand
  • Betty whites no longer with us so no.
  • If she has hubby’s approval, absolutely. Otherwise, no. I will not help someone cheat on their spouse. If they have an open marriage, it’s not cheating. Makes no difference if no one ever finds out or not. This does mean that I have to take her at her word that it’s an open marriage, though.
  • sorry but if Justin Bieber asked it’s a done deal

True Romance

– Steve writes:

beige.  we really need to paint the ceiling beige.

SeanJo

If you know, you know. And if you do know, let me know that you know. The inbox is always open.

Thanks for reaching out Steve, while not as touching as Reno Ruth’s “True really true romance” correspondence, your email is appreciated.

OUTKICK IS NOW ON THE FOX APP: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD

————-

That’s it, another successful week of romance in the books. We’ll do it again next Thursday. In the meantime, you can reach out, anonymously if you prefer, at sean.joseph@outkick.com.

Also, go follow along on Twitter and on Facebook. The DMs are always open.



Source link

‘Legal protection cannot be given to a man below 21 years of age’, Allahabad HC’s big decision on live-in

0

Allahabad High Court has given an important decision regarding live-in relationship. The High Court said that a man below 21 years of age cannot be given legal protection. The court said that the legal age for marriage of a boy has been fixed at 21 years, hence the court cannot give protection to such a couple. The court has given this order rejecting the petition of an inter-religious lover couple from Bijnor.

Actually, the petition was filed on behalf of a 20 year old Muslim girl and a 19 year old Hindu boy, both of whom had filed a petition in the court and requested for protection. It was said in the petition that they are living together of their own free will, but the girl’s family members are continuously threatening them. The petition has been rejected by the single bench of Justice Garima Prasad.

Watch: Prateek’s little angel’s innocence and uncle Akhilesh’s love, this emotional moment will fill your eyes with tears.

‘Freedom cannot be used to weaken the law’

While hearing the case, the court observed that the law has fixed the marriage age of a girl at 18 years and the marriage age of a boy at 21 years. The court said that there is an obligation of law and it cannot be ignored. The court also said that every person has the right to choose the life partner of his choice, but at the same time the court also said that freedom cannot be used to weaken the law.

If the boy’s age is less than 21 years then he is not mature – HC

The High Court has clearly said in its decision that the powers of law cannot be used to legalize an illegal situation. The court said that if the boy is not 21 years of age then the relationship will not be considered mature in the eyes of law.

Can take help from police for security- HC

The court said that if there is any kind of threat to their life, then we can go to the police for help but the court said that this does not mean that the parents or the law should be stopped from taking proper action. The court said that in this case there is neither any concrete evidence of danger nor the boy is of full age. The court rejected the petition after hearing all the parties.

Initiative to make Ayushman Yojana more transparent in UP, Yogi government running special campaign

On the announcement of SIR, AIMIM leader Waris Pathan said, ‘Every citizen should take this very seriously…’

0

The Election Commission has announced SIR in 16 states and three union territories including Maharashtra. Now Asaduddin Owaisi’s party AIMIM spokesperson Waris Pathan reacted regarding this. He said that the names of real voters should not be deleted. He also said that everyone should keep all the documents related to SIR ready.

Waris Pathan said, “The process of SIR that has started is a very important thing. Every citizen should take this very seriously. We were speaking earlier also. Names of real voters should not be deleted. He has a constitutional right to vote. His name should not be removed due to any reason, whatever documents are required, we have already been saying that you should collect them all so that when the BLO comes, we can inform you. Currently mapping was going on, many people got their names registered in it.

An app was prepared in view of SIR- Pathan

He further said, “We have only one party, there is only one party which SIR An app has been prepared in view of this. In this app you will see that the person whose name is in the voter list in 2002 is also there in 2024. If you enter epic number in it, you will get complete details. Recently, our party president Asaduddin Owaisi Sahab had come to Aurangabad, Maharashtra, had called all the people of the state associated with the party and the media was also called. Here a presentation was also shown that see, you can use our app in this way. Take advantage of this so that the name of any genuine voter is not deleted.

People should keep all the documents ready – Waris Pathan

Waris Pathan also said that this app is very beneficial. Training is also going on in Hyderabad. Camps are being set up. When BLO comes, BLS will also go there and cooperate so that no voter’s name is deleted, this is very important because the Government of India is linking it with NPR, NRC. All the documents related to the list given should be kept ready. You can download that app, you will completely understand what to do.

Citizenship of any person should not be lost – Pathan

He said, “No person should lose his citizenship.” They have announced that they will start it in June. BLOs will be there, all the people of our party will be there and will help. It should be ensured that no one’s citizenship or voting rights are taken away.

Sharad Pawar’s big statement referring to PM Modi, ‘Those who are shortening their convoy should…’

Will Starmer go – and if so, how? Four scenarios in the battle for No 10 | Labour party leadership

0


  • 1. A contest without Burnham

    The Greater Manchester mayor, Andy Burnham, the probable favourite among Labour MPs, is not in parliament. Any resolution in the coming weeks would require a sitting MP to trigger a contest by getting the backing of 80-plus colleagues, or persuading Starmer to set a timetable to quit.

    The MP for Makerfield in Greater Manchester, Josh Simons, announced on Thursday afternoon that he was giving up his seat and wanted Burnham to take it. It remains to be seen if Downing Street will let Burnham stand, and if it does, whether he would win.

    If that does not happen for any reason, then there could be an impasse. Wes Streeting, who resigned as health secretary on Thursday, had reportedly pledged to start a contest but seemingly failed to raise the necessary support among MPs. Other possible challengers – such as Angela Rayner and Ed Miliband – do not seem to be mobilising fully.

    But things could change quickly, for example if one of the promised new tranches of documents about Peter Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador to the US brings more damaging revelations.

    It is worth noting that if someone did launch a formal challenge, Starmer could fight them – and he could then win a vote of Labour members.


  • 2. A contest with Burnham back

    If Downing Street allows the Labour machine to endorse Burnham as the candidate in Makerfield, it would take some weeks for the byelection to happen. A win would send him back to the Commons.

    Letting Burnham run for MP is possible. While Downing Street made sure he was blocked from standing in the Gorton and Denton byelection, Starmer would be under huge pressure to change course this time around.

    Again, if a leadership contest followed, Starmer might opt to fight and could win. The party uses the single transferable vote system, where members rank candidates by preference. It would not be inconceivable for Starmer to win a three-way race based on second-choice votes from people who did not want one of the alternatives taking over.

    Leadership favourability chart

  • 3. An even slower Burnham contest

    This could be different purely from a timetabling point of view. If Burnham is rebuffed in his attempts to be selected for Makerfield, something could emerge in the long term.

    There is also a world in which Downing Street agrees to allow Burnham to fight a Commons seat once his mayoral term ends in 2028. Some MPs believe changing prime ministers nearer an election might be better, to provide a sense of freshness and momentum.

    The challenge with this idea is that it would leave a deeply hobbled lame duck PM in Downing Street for two years, struggling to implement an agenda and very possibly driving Labour even lower in the polls.


  • 4. Starmer survives

    Hang on, what? Yes, it does seem unlikely: Starmer has proved an underwhelming prime minister by most metrics, and while close to 100 Labour MPs have called for him to go, quite a few more are known to privately want this to happen.

    If Starmer does not quit – which, thus far, is not on the cards – then he will need to be pushed. Burnham might not win a byelection; none of Streeting, Miliband or Rayner might go for it.

    This would feel like a recipe for managed decline. But there is, in theory, the possibility of Starmer reinventing himself and sending Labour back up the opinion polls. That maybe feels like the least likely outcome of all.



  • Source link