From IPO frenzy to freeze: Will retail demand rebound soon?

0

While IPOs were once long-term investments, they are increasingly seen as speculative, short-term plays. Analysts caution that retail investors must evaluate valuations, governance, and business fundamentals, while companies must price offerings carefully to attract long-term investor confidence.

While IPOs were once long-term investments, they are increasingly seen as speculative, short-term plays. Analysts caution that retail investors must evaluate valuations, governance, and business fundamentals, while companies must price offerings carefully to attract long-term investor confidence.

Of late, initial public offerings (IPOs), once seen as a hotspot for retail investors chasing quick gains, have lost much of their earlier appeal.

Of the 14 mainboard IPOs, every second one failed to secure full retail subscription — only Shree Ram Twistex and Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (BCCL) drew strong interest.

IPOs of companies such as Clean Max Enviro Energy Solutions, Sedemac Mechatronics, Omnitech Engineering, Rajputana Stainless and GSP Crop Science had seen subscription of less than 0.5 times (or 50 per cent) of the quota.

Slide in GMP

One key reason for the waning retail interest in IPOs is the sharp decline in grey-market premiums (GMPs). Earlier, GMP was the primary reason luring retail investors into IPOs. As the name implies, the gray market is an unregulated, unofficial market where shares are traded before their formal listing on stock exchanges.

Of the 12 companies listed so far, seven are currently trading below their issue price, with losses going up to around 53 per cent in the case of Shree Ram Twistex. Ironically, Shree Ram Twistex had witnessed the highest retail participation at 76.63 times. On the other hand, BCCL —another IPO with strong retail subscription (79.37 times) — continues to trade at a premium of 47.72 per cent.

As the market experienced turbulence due to the Iran-Israel-US war, retail investors became largely cautious across both primary and secondary markets.

SEBI study

In 2024, in light of the increasing participation of retail investors and the heightened oversubscription, SEBI launched an in-depth study to analyze investor behavior in main board IPOs, based on April 2021 and December 2023 data.

The study had revealed a “flipping” behavior among Individual Investors. Individual investors sold 50 per cent of the shares allotted to them by value within a week of listing, and 70 per cent of shares by value within a year.

The study also found a “strong disposition effect”, with investors showing a greater propensity to sell IPO shares that posted positive listing gains, compared to those that listed at a loss. Another interesting revelation was the influence of returns. “When IPO returns exceeded 20 per cent, individual investors sold 67.6 per cent of the shares by value within a week. In contrast, only 23.3 per cent of shares by value were sold when returns were negative.

IPOs, once viewed as long-term investments, have increasingly turned into speculative plays aimed at making quick gains on listing day. The shortened listing cycle of just three days has further boosted investor interest, as funds are returned quickly, reducing the opportunity cost of idle capital. With this faster turnaround, the trend is likely to accelerate, as many investors continue to chase quick, easy profits.

However, with several big-ticket IPOs—such as those from SBI Mutual Fund, National Stock Exchange of India, Reliance Jio, PhonePe, Flipkart, OYO, and Zepto—expected to tap the capital markets, the current weakening sentiment in the primary market is a concern. One hopes that investor confidence revives soon so that large and fundamentally strong companies can attract robust interest.

Before committing funds, retail investors should carefully assess an IPO’s valuation, corporate governance standards, cash flows, and the business’s scalability. Taking a long-term view can benefit both investors and companies. At the same time, companies must price their offerings appropriately—leaving room for investor gains—while upholding high standards of corporate governance.

Published on March 20, 2026

Bureaucracy stalls advanced nuclear reactors and US energy dominance

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In February, the United States airlifted a nuclear microreactor for the first time. It was more than a technical achievement – it was a symbol of transformation, akin to the launch of the first steam-powered sailing ships that reshaped global commerce. And just as we couldn’t build the progress of the 20th century on the back of wind-powered ships, we can’t power the 21st-century economy with unreliable, weather-dependent energy sources. America’s future prosperity requires abundant, affordable and reliable power to complement America’s vast reserves of fossil fuels. The solution is clear: a new generation of advanced nuclear reactors.

America is entering a new era of industrial revival, powered by a surge in domestic manufacturing and the rise of artificial intelligence. This surge is creating an unprecedented thirst for electricity. After a decade of flat demand, America’s industries are roaring back to life. But grid operators are warning of a looming “reliability crisis” as reliable power plants are retired far faster than they are replaced. 

Meanwhile, the demand from AI, electrification and resurgent manufacturing is projected to add as much as 166 gigawatts (15 times what New York City requires) of new peak load by the end of the decade – an unprecedented surge that will strain existing infrastructure.

For decades, nuclear power has stood as an unassuming giant in the power sector, providing nearly 20% of America’s electricity with unparalleled reliability. Today, a new generation of advanced reactors – small modular reactors (SMRs) and microreactors – is poised to expand nuclear energy’s role. These reactors are designed to be built in factories and assembled on-site, dramatically reducing construction times and costs.

TRUMP ADMIN RELAUNCHES KEY COUNCIL AFTER BIDEN ADMIN SHUTTERED IT: ‘IGNORANCE AND ARROGANCE’

Nuclear Reactor and Trump split

The Department of War airlifted a next-generation nuclear reactor to Utah, advancing President Trump’s push to modernize U.S. energy and strengthen national security. (Department of War; Getty Images)

Their smaller size allows them to be deployed in more places, including at retiring coal plants to reuse existing grid infrastructure and skilled workforces. A single SMR module can power a large data-center campus or a cluster of factories.

Beyond electricity, these advanced reactors can provide high-temperature heat needed to make steel and fertilizer, a crucial industrial input that solar and wind cannot meet. SMRs can even power desalination plants to turn arid landscapes into thriving communities. Microreactors are already being developed to provide secure, resilient power to remote military bases like Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska, freeing them from dependence on the grid.

The primary obstacle to this promising future isn’t physics or engineering; it’s a half-century of suffocating government bureaucracy. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) licensing framework was designed for the large reactors of the 1970s and is inadequate for today’s advanced designs.

TRUMP ADMIN’S ENERGY AGENDA HAILED FOR CRUCIAL ‘WINS’ AS GREEN ACTIVISTS LASH OUT

Congress ordered the NRC to create a modern, streamlined process, known as Part 53. But instead of a clear path forward, the draft rule is becoming another layer of complex, burdensome requirements that could delay innovation rather than enable it. This moves us further from, rather than closer to, the energy dominance agenda. Instead, we should end local bans on nuclear power and lower barriers to startups seeking to increase competition and innovation.

We must also reject outdated fears about nuclear energy. Today’s advanced reactors are not our grandparents’ power plants. They possess inherent safety features that make accidents exceedingly unlikely, if not physically impossible.

They also help us steward our environment responsibly: they produce immense quantities of energy from a tiny amount of fuel, with a minimal physical footprint, and no air pollution. This stands in stark contrast to solar and wind, which require vast tracts of land and large-scale mining for their construction and deployment.

Public perceptions must also evolve. There are some that still raise concerns about nuclear safety and waste. But the entire amount of used fuel from America’s nuclear industry over 60 years could fit on a single football field.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

This material, far from a crisis, is a manageable byproduct and can even be reprocessed to yield valuable minerals and re-usable uranium. The far greater crisis is a lack of energy, which consigns billions of people to poverty globally and threatens the stability of our own economy.

Beyond electricity, these advanced reactors can provide high-temperature heat needed to make steel and fertilizer, a crucial industrial input that solar and wind cannot meet. 

This is not just an economic issue – it is a national security imperative. While America’s nuclear industry is tangled in red tape, Russia and China are aggressively moving to export their own reactors across the globe, using state-backed financing to create decades-long dependencies.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Every market we concede to them is a loss for American influence and security, and every time an American SMR developer is stalled by bureaucracy, it is a victory for Moscow and Beijing. We can either lead the world in setting the gold standard for safety and non-proliferation, or we can cede the future of global energy to authoritarian regimes.

America has always thrived when it embraced bold technologies and rejected complacency.  So now is the time to be bold.  The AI boom and the return of manufacturing represent a historic opportunity. But to seize it, we must have the energy to power it. The servers processing complex algorithms and the factories forging new products all depend on a simple input: energy that is always powered on.

Jason Hayes is the director of Energy & Environment at America First Policy Institute.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM NEWT GINGRICH



Source link

Iran does not need to close the Strait of Hormuz to disrupt it | US-Israel war on Iran

0

The world still speaks about the Strait of Hormuz as if the central question were whether Iran will try to close it. That is now the wrong question.

Iran’s most effective military option is not to mine the Strait of Hormuz itself, nor the narrow, internationally scrutinised traffic corridor inside the strait proper, but to mine the approaches to the strait, especially the entrance zones where commercial traffic converges before entering the constrained transit system. That is where disruption can be generated most efficiently, over the widest possible maritime area, while remaining under Iranian surveillance and command-and-control coverage.

This distinction matters. It is the difference between a crude blockade and a technically sophisticated interdiction strategy.

Operationally, the Strait of Hormuz is not simply a broad expanse of water. Commercial shipping moves through a traffic separation scheme, a regulated two-lane transit structure with inbound and outbound channels separated by a buffer zone. Large crude carriers and very large crude carriers are in effect canalised by draft, navigational rules and safety requirements into a highly predictable transit pattern. Their routes, speeds and timings are known in advance. In military terms, this is a forced maritime funnel.

But the key battlespace is not only the funnel itself. It is the wider approach geometry leading into it.

Before tankers enter the strait proper, traffic compresses through the Gulf of Oman approaches towards the entrance corridor. This is where Iran gains its greatest advantage. If mines are seeded in the entrance zones rather than inside the marked shipping lanes, the effect can extend across a broader manoeuvre space while avoiding the political and operational signature of overtly mining the strait itself. Tehran does not need to place mines directly under the keel line of every tanker. It only needs to create sufficient uncertainty in the approach battlespace that mariners, insurers and naval escorts assume contamination.

That logic is reinforced by hydrography. Surface circulation flows from the Gulf of Oman into the Gulf, while denser saline outflow moves at depth in the opposite direction. Floating, semimoored or near-surface devices deployed in the entrance zones can therefore drift naturally towards commercial traffic patterns without being laid directly in the formal transit lanes. A limited number of mines placed in the right location can create a disproportionate effect over a much wider maritime area. This is precisely why the entrance is the optimal interdiction zone: it enlarges the danger area, complicates clearance operations and magnifies uncertainty.

The relevant Iranian concept is not closure. It is selective, controlled disruption.

That concept depends on surveillance, and here Iran retains a meaningful advantage. From Bandar Abbas to Qeshm, Larak, Abu Musa, Sirri and the Jask–Kooh Mobarak sector, Iran’s northern littoral provides overlapping observation angles across the tanker lanes and their approaches. Coastal radar, UAV reconnaissance, patrol craft reporting, electronic emissions tracking and civilian maritime observation all contribute to a layered maritime picture. Even where parts of this network have been degraded, the architecture does not collapse easily because it is redundant by design.

That maritime picture is now deepened by space-based ISR. Iran’s Khayyam electro-optical satellite, developed with Russian support, provides high-resolution imagery that can be tasked over the Gulf and the approaches to Hormuz. It is not a constellation, but it does not need to be one to matter. When fused with Russian optical, electronic and maritime surveillance assets and integrated into Iranian coastal command networks, it strengthens Tehran’s ability to identify shipping concentrations, observe escorts, monitor port activity and select the most effective timing and location for asymmetric action.

This is what makes entrance-zone mining viable. Iran can observe the battlespace continuously enough to avoid indiscriminate use of force and instead apply pressure with precision.

Modern mine warfare further strengthens that option. Naval mines are no longer limited to simple drifting contact devices. Iran’s inventory is believed to include influence mines triggered by magnetic, acoustic or pressure signatures, bottom mines placed on the seabed, moored mines set at selected depths and command-detonated or controlled mines that can remain dormant until activated remotely or by preset criteria. Some systems can be delayed, some can self-neutralise, and some deployed close to friendly coastlines can be recovered or repositioned.

This is the crucial point: a controlled minefield in the approaches does not need to be permanently active to be strategically effective.

Mines can be emplaced early, left inert, repositioned if necessary and activated only at a chosen moment. If laid near Iranian-controlled coastlines and within the surveillance envelope of Iranian coastal forces, they can be managed as a reversible instrument of coercion. That gives Tehran escalation control. It also gives it deniability. The absence of an explosion is not proof of the absence of mines. Dormant influence mines or controlled devices can exist in the entrance battlespace without immediate kinetic effect while still forcing commercial actors to behave as though the area is contaminated.

That is how maritime disruption works today, not through dramatic closure, but through calibrated navigational insecurity.

Once shipping companies believe the approaches may contain selective mine threats, the economic effect begins immediately. War risk premiums rise. Transit slows. Clearance operations become necessary. Naval escorts are stretched. Traffic management turns defensive. The shipping corridor may remain technically open, but operationally it becomes degraded. In energy markets, that is enough.

This is why debate over whether the strait itself has been mined misses the point. The more plausible scenario is that limited, controlled deployment in the approaches has already created the conditions Iran seeks. With the geometry of the transit lanes, the hydrography of the entrance, the persistence of Iranian surveillance and the availability of modern controlled mines, the threshold for disruption is now extremely low.

The Strait of Hormuz does not need to be visibly mined to function as if it were.

In strategic terms, it already is.

The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.



Source link

FCC takes notice as NFL becomes increasingly costly, frustrating to consume

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

America’s most popular sport has become expensive and frustrating to consume. 

NFL fans who want to access every game need YouTube TV for “NFL Sunday Ticket,” along with costly subscriptions to Amazon Prime, Peacock and Netflix. All the packages cost fans well over $1,500 a year combined, and that doesn’t include fees associated with basic cable packages that many Americans still subscribe to or high-speed Wi-Fi needed to accommodate the streamers. 

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr has made it a point of emphasis to help American sports fans as the NFL, along with the NBA, MLB and other major sports, have moved key games from broadcast and cable television to costly streaming services. 

Last month, the FCC announced it would seek public comments on the ongoing shift of live sports from broadcast channels to streaming services. The comment period runs through March 27 and replies to the comments are due April 13. 

NFL WILL DILUTE PRODUCT EVEN FURTHER BY OPENING SEASON ON A WEDNESDAY

Trump at NFL game

The FCC under the Trump administration is seeking public comments on the ongoing shift of live sports from broadcast channels to streaming services. (Getty Images)

Carr has suggested it’s simply too expensive and inconvenient for consumers to watch their favorite teams, and while he understands the argument that streaming opens more games and more content, he believes the cons outweigh the pros for most fans. 

“Americans are frustrated when they sit down and can’t find the game they want to watch. And that feeling grows only worse when they realize that they might need to sign up for another streaming service to watch the game,” Carr told Fox News Digital

“There has long been a strong and mutually beneficial relationship between sports leagues and broadcasters, and consumers will benefit if that continues,” Carr continued. “I want to see Americans continue to benefit from free over-the-air sports programming.”

EX-NFL STAR CAUTIONS LEAGUE ABOUT ‘GIVING FANS TOO MUCH’ AS THANKSGIVING EVE GAME REPORTEDLY EYED

Josh Allen

NFL fans who want to access every game need YouTube TV for “NFL Sunday Ticket,” along with costly subscriptions to Amazon Prime, Peacock and Netflix.  (Lauren Leigh Bacho/Getty Images)

But as Carr is concerned that streaming games are maddening for sports fans, the media industry appears well aware the trend will continue.

The issue particularly impacts the NFL, as the most popular sport in the country has reopened its rights deal with Paramount and CBS. Popular Hollywood-focused podcast “The Town” dedicated an episode to the “NFL’s billion-dollar cash grab” on Wednesday.

“We all know how important sports rights have become to the entertainment and media companies. For the linear TV business, it’s basically sports, and to a lesser extent news, driving audiences and not much else. For the streaming services looking to lure new subscribers, nothing generates a sign-up better than an exclusive, premium sports event,” host Matt Belloni told listeners. 

“But where is that tipping point? The level at which sports rights become so expensive that the traditional outlets can no longer justify the cost, and the streaming players fully take over?” Belloni continued. “A huge test of this theory is what’s going on with the NFL right now.”

CBS’ contract with the NFL has a “change of control” provision that will be triggered by Skydance Media’s pending takeover of parent company Paramount. CNBC’s Alex Sherman recently reported that the NFL and CBS “are negotiating a price increase, with a bid-ask spread midpoint around 50% or 60%” to keep Sunday games on CBS. 

Sherman noted that CBS “currently pays around $2.1 billion a year, on average, for its Sunday afternoon games,” and a 50% increase could force CBS to shell out more than $3 billion for its new deal. In exchange for the extra cash, the NFL would eliminate an opt-out clause after the 2029-30 season that would have allowed the league to cut ties with CBS early. The current deal runs through 2033. 

NFL’S PUSH FOR GROWTH IS INEXORABLE AT EXPENSE OF FANS AND AMID AN ‘EXISTENTIAL THREAT’

Roger Goodell speaks to the media

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Sherman, who was a guest on “The Town” to discuss the ordeal, said the NFL doesn’t want to put CBS “out of business,” because the result would be fewer companies bidding on its product in the future. But the NFL is well aware that CBS and other companies need its content to survive and will squeeze out as much revenue as possible. 

As the negotiations take place, Sherman noted that broadcast executives are peeved that the NFL has given Amazon very attractive games often featuring marquee matchups for its “Thursday Night Football” streaming package. Whenever a highly coveted game airs on Amazon or other streamers, it diminishes the quality of the matchups Americans can access on broadcast networks. 

Sherman said that the league “rewarded Amazon” with better games when it proved there was an audience for the NFL on a streaming service, but Belloni suggested that the league simply has to play nice with Amazon incase streaming completely upends linear consumption down the road. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Carr has also highlighted that the partnership between broadcasters and sports rights has helped fund local news and journalism, as sports helps drive revenue to local stations that many Americans rely on. The Trump-appointed FCC boss feels that the relationship could be undermined if leagues continue to ditch local broadcasters for streaming services that are behind costly paywalls. The same theory could weaken entertainment offerings as networks like CBS will be forced to cut other spending to fork over more cash to the NFL.

“Something probably needs to give here, and it’s not going to be the NFL,” Sherman said. 

The NFL did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 



Source link

Iran today, Africa tomorrow | US-Israel war on Iran

0

Israel and America’s war on Iran has killed more than 1,500 people in a matter of weeks, and the toll continues to rise.

In Tehran on March 7, mourners gathered around the coffin of Zainab Sahebi, a two-year-old girl killed in an Israeli air strike. A small doll lay beside her coffin as relatives and neighbours crowded the funeral, grappling with the loss of a child taken in an instant.

Zainab’s funeral was only one of many.

On March 3, thousands gathered in Minab, in Hormozgan province, for a mass funeral after the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ primary school was destroyed during the opening day of the bombing campaign. Rows of coffins were carried through the city as families laid to rest at least 175 students and staff, most of them children, killed in one of the deadliest incidents of the conflict.

Violence like this has a long and familiar history.

From Gaza to Lebanon and now Iran, civilians continue to bear the price of imperialism.

This escalation has not been limited to civilians. Israeli strikes also killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with senior military officials.

For Africa, the crisis unfolding thousands of kilometres away is not a distant geopolitical calamity.

Instability in the Gulf has historically translated into sharp fuel price increases across the continent, with imported petroleum underpinning transport, electricity generation and food supply chains from Lagos and Nairobi to Johannesburg and Dakar.

The result is rising inflation and higher food prices.

Still, Africa’s stake in this conflict is not only economic.

It is also a legal and political question.

The issue confronting African governments is not whether they admire the Islamic Republic of Iran or the United States.

The real question is whether the rules governing the use of force between states still apply at all.

Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter prohibits states from using military force against the territorial integrity or political independence of another state, except in self-defence or with UN Security Council authorisation, a principle long understood as central to international order.

None of these legal thresholds were met in the case of the strikes on Iran.

Instead, both Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz and US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth have presented the strikes on Iran as acts of “preemptive” self-defence against Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities.

Africans have seen before how quickly Western military campaigns, launched in the name of democracy, human rights or humanitarian protection, can expand far beyond their stated purpose.

Libya is a case in point.

In March 2011, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1973, authorising “all necessary measures” to protect civilians during Libya’s uprising against Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

Within months, NATO aircraft were conducting an extensive bombing campaign across Libya, striking military installations and government infrastructure, while also killing civilians.

For many Africans, it was no cause for celebration.

The moment symbolised something deeper: a Western air war that culminated in the violent overthrow of an African government and the death of its leader.

More than a decade later, Libya remains politically fractured, governed by rival administrations in Tripoli and eastern Libya, while armed militias continue to dominate large parts of the country.

Libya’s collapse also destabilised the wider Sahel, where looted Libyan weapons and returning fighters helped ignite the 2012 rebellion in Mali, and contributed to coups and insurgencies that continue to shake Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso.

Libya, like Iraq and Afghanistan, stands as a warning of what can follow when outside powers remake a state through force.

Indeed, the pattern across Iran, Libya and the Democratic Republic of the Congo is clear. In each case, leaders sought to assert national control over strategic resources — oil in Iran and Libya, minerals in the DRC — only to face confrontation with Western dominance.

In September 1960, Congo’s independence leader Patrice Lumumba was deposed in a Western-backed coup and executed four months later after attempting to secure sovereignty over the country’s vast mineral wealth.

Half a century later, the same fate befell Gaddafi.

Today, Iran’s leader has been killed in a military operation justified as a security necessity.

Africa and the wider Global South stand at a crossroads.

The United Nations and the UN Charter remain among the few barriers standing between the present and a return to an era when powerful Western nations openly reserved the right to pillage Africa and other continents at any cost.

At the turn of the 20th century in the Congo Free State, in present-day DRC, the regime of King Leopold II of Belgium presided over a system of forced labour so brutal that historians estimate around 10 million Congolese died from violence, disease and starvation.

American troops occupied Cuba after the Spanish–American War of 1898 and forced the island to accept the Platt Amendment, which gave Washington the right to intervene in its affairs. The United States also seized Puerto Rico in the same war and, in April 1914, landed forces in Veracruz, Mexico, during the Mexican Revolution.

These actions reflected a time when powerful states acted with impunity and reshaped governments at will.

African leaders must respond to the present violations with clarity and resolve.

They should demand an immediate cessation of hostilities and unequivocally condemn the leaders responsible for this escalation: Israeli strongman Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump.

They must defend Iran’s sovereignty and Iranian lives.

They must stand up to the many faces of imperial power, including through coordinated action at the African Union and the United Nations General Assembly.

When African states founded the Organisation of African Unity in Addis Ababa on May 25, 1963, one of its core principles was respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, a response to centuries of external intervention on the continent.

On that occasion, Ghana’s founding president Kwame Nkrumah warned fellow African leaders that “independence is only the prelude to a new and more involved struggle for the right to conduct our own economic and social affairs unhampered by crushing and humiliating neo-colonialist controls and interference”.

More than 60 years later, that warning still stands.

It is time to defend the principles of the United Nations Charter.

History shows how quickly precedents travel.

Today it is Iran.

Tomorrow it may be Africa.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.



Source link

Chuck wagon cook Kent Rollins shares 6 tips for cooking in extreme weather

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As much of the country shifts from winter storms to warmer temperatures with the arrival of spring, a veteran cowboy cook says decades of experience have taught him how to prepare meals in some of the harshest conditions on Earth.

Kent Rollins, a longtime chuck wagon cook and Outdoor Channel host, has spent decades cooking for ranchers in extreme weather conditions across the country.

“If they can cowboy in it and get horseback, I can cook in it,” Rollins told Fox News Digital.

AMERICA’S ‘CAST IRON COWBOY’ REVEALS WHY TRADITIONAL SKILLETS REMAIN THE ULTIMATE COOKING TOOL

From minus-30 wind chills to 117-degree heat, Rollins, based in New Mexico, has learned how to adapt while preparing simple meals outdoors year-round.

“Life is simple,” he said. “Don’t complicate it with cooking.”

Cowboy chef Kent Rollins holds spoonfull of stew at campsite.

Kent Rollins has spent decades cooking for ranchers in some of the harshest conditions in the country. (Outdoor Channel)

Rollins has built a following of millions across social media and hosts “Cast Iron Cowboy” on the Outdoor Channel. 

He also recently launched the “Cowboy Coffee Hour” podcast with his wife, Shannon, with the two sharing stories from the trail and lessons on grit, faith and the cowboy code. 

COWBOY CHEF SAYS AMERICANS ARE TURNING TO ONE OF THE ‘HEALTHIEST MEATS,’ AND IT’S AT MOST GROCERY STORES

Here are six tips Rollins revealed to Fox News Digital that are essential for cooking in extreme conditions, he said. 

1. Stay hydrated in extreme heat and watch for warning signs

In high temperatures, Rollins, who was raised in Oklahoma, said hydration is critical — but water alone isn’t enough.

Kent Rollins stands next to a cast-iron grill and a tent.

Kent Rollins is a rancher and host of the popular Outdoor Channel show “Cast Iron Cowboy.” (Shannon Rollins)

“You’ve got to have something that’s going to put some of the good stuff back in you,” he said, noting he often turns to electrolytes, bananas and even coconut water.

FRIED BOLOGNA SANDWICH IS BOTH COWBOY ‘COMFORT FOOD’ AND ‘FIVE-STAR DINING’

He also warned people to pay attention to their bodies.

“If you ever reach up there to wipe your brow and there ain’t no sweat no more, you might have done went too far,” he said.

2. Dress in layers in the cold to prevent frostbite

Cold weather presents its own dangers, especially for those cooking outdoors for long stretches.

Rollins recommended dressing in layers and wearing moisture-wicking clothing.

Kent Rollins, an Oklahoma-born chuck wagon cook, has spent decades preserving traditional cowboy cooking methods.

Rollins says cooking outdoors requires both adaptability and common sense. (Shannon Rollins)

“Try to wear something that’s going to wick away that moisture in the wintertime if you do get sweating because water and cold make ice,” he warned.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

Rollins also stressed the importance of covering exposed areas — noting that frostbite can set in quickly in extreme wind and snow. 

3. Plan your meals based on the weather

What’s on the menu should change with the weather, Rollins said.

In colder months, he focuses on high-calorie, hearty meals. 

“We make a lot of one-pot meals,” he said, including stews, chili and homemade sloppy Joes with ground beef, onions, jalapeños, chipotle peppers, adobe sauce and grated cheese to thicken it.

Cowboy chef Kent Rollins holding chicken-fried steak with tongs at campsite on the frontier.

In hotter temperatures, Rollins says ranch hands may still enjoy steak. (Outdoor Channel)

For breakfast, he keeps things straightforward with a biscuit recipe that only calls for self-rising flour and heavy whipping cream.

In extreme heat, however, appetites shrink and meals get lighter. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES

“Cowboys ain’t going to eat as much, especially at a noon meal,” he said. 

4. Protect your fire — and always have a backup plan

Cooking outdoors means everything depends on your fire, Rollins said, especially in bad weather.

That means shielding it from wind, snow or rain and having a plan to keep it going. 

Cowboys on horseback riding toward tents with mountains in background.

A well-placed shelter and dry firewood are essential, says Rollins. (Shannon Rollins)

“Make sure you have some kind of shelter … that the water is not going to put it out,” he said.

5. Pre-warm the cast iron in cold weather to avoid cracking

Extreme temperatures can impact cookware, too, Rollins said.

Cast iron should never be taken from very cold to very hot too quickly, he said. 

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

“If you shock cast iron from really being too cold to too hot in a hurry, you might crack it in half,” he said. 

Instead, he recommended gradually warming it near a fire or stove before cooking and letting it cool down slowly afterward.

Cowboys eating meal on frontier, seen behind pots on burners.

Proper care of cast iron is key in extreme conditions, Rollins says. (Shannon Rollins)

6. Use coolers for more than just keeping food cold

One of Rollins’ most versatile tools isn’t a pan or a pot. It’s a cooler, which he uses in multiple ways, depending on the weather. 

In winter, an ice chest can keep ingredients like potatoes from freezing. It can also help thaw meat or hold heat with hot water in it.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Overall, mindset is the most important ingredient, according to Rollins. 

“If it doesn’t challenge you, it will never change you,” he said.



Source link

Access Denied

0

Access Denied You don’t have permission to access “http://hindi.gadgets360.com/apps/india-government-aadhaar-app-preinstall-smartphones-apple-samsung-google-mait-oppose-proposal-news-11243081” on this server.

Reference #18.4d560e17.1774005701.76557d7

https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.4d560e17.1774005701.76557d7

Oral insulin pill shows promise in lowering blood sugar in early study

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Oral insulin could one day replace injections for people with diabetes, new scientific discoveries suggest.

Researchers from Kumamoto University in Japan have announced the development of an insulin pill to help lower blood sugar.

For diabetics, insulin is typically administered via injection, but the pill would offer a non-invasive treatment option.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

“Insulin injections remain a daily burden for many patients,” said Associate Professor Shingo Ito, a researcher in the study’s press release. “Our peptide-based platform offers a new route to deliver insulin orally, and may be applicable to long-acting insulin formulations and other injectable biologics.”

girl puts pill to mouth while holding water glass

Oral insulin could one day replace injections for people with diabetes, new scientific discoveries suggest. (iStock)

The study, published in the journal Molecular Pharmaceutics, tested the delivery of oral insulin by building a carrier peptide called DNP-V. This peptide helps to transport insulin through the small intestine, where protein drug absorption is usually poor.

In diabetic mice models, the researchers administered the peptide by mouth with zinc-stabilized insulin, which was formulated with zinc ions to make it more stable, according to the study.

“Insulin injections remain a daily burden for many patients.”

The result was a rapid and significant drop in blood glucose, as well as a sustained (longer-term) decrease. The mice’s blood sugar was reduced to near-normal levels.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

When DNP-V was attached directly to insulin, the results showed enhanced absorption in the intestines and a similar glucose-lowering effect, the researchers noted.

The treatment was effective in different diabetes models, significantly reducing blood sugar spikes after meals with just one dose per day.

white mouse held by gloved hand in lab

The study was done in mice, which leaves uncertainty if the treatment will translate to humans. (iStock)

The findings suggest that DNP peptides could serve as flexible, adaptable platforms for delivering large-molecule drugs by mouth, the authors concluded in the study abstract.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

“This technology can simply and effectively convert injectable biopharmaceuticals into orally administrable forms, offering a promising path to practical, patient-friendly oral therapies,” they wrote.

Although the researchers are optimistic about the findings translating to larger therapeutic models, they noted that the results in mice do not guarantee the same outcome in humans, and that more research is needed.

child gets finger pricked for diabetes

For diabetics, insulin is typically administered via injection to regulate blood sugar levels. (iStock)

Dr. Marc Siegel commented on this development, noting that oral insulin could make a big difference in healthcare.

“Insulin use, especially in type 1 diabetes, is sometimes difficult to regulate by injection,” Siegel, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. “Oral use would have major advantages.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

He added, “This is very promising provided that it works in humans, which is a big ‘if.'”

Fox News Digital reached out to the study authors for comment.



Source link

Access Denied

0

Access Denied You don’t have permission to access “http://hindi.news18.com/photogallery/sports/cricket-harshit-rana-to-mitchell-starc-these-players-from-ipl-2026-were-ruled-out-or-not-play-early-games-10291994.html” on this server.

Reference #18.4a200117.1774006090.3a58a8

https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.4a200117.1774006090.3a58a8

The Importance of Behavioral Analytics in AI-Enabled Cyber Attacks

0

The Hacker NewsMar 20, 2026Artificial Intelligence / Data Protection

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing how individuals and organizations conduct many activities, including how cybercriminals carry out phishing attacks and iterate on malware. Now, cybercriminals are using AI to generate personalized phishing emails, deepfakes and malware that evade traditional detection by impersonating normal user activity and bypassing legacy security models. As a result, rule-based models alone are often insufficient for identity security against AI-enabled threats. Behavioral analytics must evolve beyond monitoring suspicious activity patterns over time into dynamic, identity-based risk modeling capable of identifying inconsistencies in real time.

Common risks introduced by AI-enabled attacks

AI-enabled cyber attacks introduce very different security risks compared to traditional cyber threats. By relying on automation and mimicking legitimate behavior, AI allows cybercriminals to scale their attacks while reducing obvious signals to remain undetected.

AI-powered phishing and social engineering

Unlike traditional phishing attacks that use generic messaging, AI enables personalized phishing messages at scale using public data, impersonating the writing styles of executives or creating context-aware messages referencing real events. These AI-powered attacks can reduce obvious red flags, slip past some filtering approaches and rely on psychological manipulation instead of malware delivery, significantly increasing the risk of credential theft and financial fraud.

Automated credential abuse and account takeovers

AI-enhanced credential abuse can optimize login attempts while avoiding triggering lockout thresholds, mimicking human-like timing between authentication attempts and targeting privileged accounts based on context. Since these attacks use compromised credentials, they often appear valid and blend into normal login activity, making identity security a crucial component of modern security strategies.

AI-assisted malware

Before cybercriminals could use AI to accelerate malware development and deployment, they had to manually modify code signatures and spend copious time creating new variants. AI can further speed up variation, scripting and adaptation. With modern adaptive malware, cybercriminals can automatically modify code to avoid detection, change behavior based on the environment and generate new exploit variants with little to no manual effort. Since traditional signature-based detection models struggle against continuously evolving code, organizations must start relying on behavioral patterns rather than static indicators.

How traditional behavioral monitoring can fail against AI-based attacks

Traditional monitoring was designed to detect cyber threats driven by malware, known security vulnerabilities and visible behavioral anomalies. Here are some of the ways traditional behavioral monitoring falls short against AI-enabled attacks:

  • Signature-based detection can’t identify modern threats: Signature-based tools rely on known signs of compromise. AI-assisted malware constantly rewrites its own code and automatically generates new variants, making static code signatures obsolete.
  • Rule-based systems rely on predefined thresholds: Many behavioral monitoring systems depend on rules, such as login frequency or geographic location. AI-assisted cybercriminals adjust their behavior to remain within set limits, conducting malicious activity over a longer period of time and mimicking human behavior to avoid detection.
  • Perimeter-based models fail when compromised credentials are involved: Traditional perimeter-based security models assume trust once a user or device is authenticated. When cybercriminals authenticate with legitimate credentials, these outdated models treat them as valid users, allowing them to carry out malicious actions.
  • AI-based attacks are designed to appear normal: AI-based cyber threats intentionally blend in by operating within assigned permissions, following anticipated workflows and executing their activities gradually. While isolated activity may seem legitimate, the main risk is when activity is regarded in tandem with behavioral context over time.

Why behavioral analytics must shift for AI-based attacks

The shift to modern behavioral analytics requires an evolution from simple threat detection into dynamic, context-aware risk modeling capable of identifying subtle privilege misuse.

Identity-based attacks require context

To appear normal, AI-driven cybercriminals often use credentials compromised through phishing or credential abuse, work from known devices or networks and conduct malicious activity over time to avoid detection. Modern behavioral analytics must evaluate whether even the slightest change in behavior is consistent with a user’s typical behavioral patterns. Advanced behavioral models establish baselines, assess real-time activity and combine identity, device and session context.

Monitoring must extend across the entire stack

Once cybercriminals gain access to systems through compromised, weak or reused credentials, they focus on gradually expanding their access. Behavioral visibility needs to cover the full security stack, including privileged access, cloud infrastructure, endpoints, applications and administrative accounts. For behavioral analytics to be more effective against AI-based cyber attacks, organizations must enforce zero-trust security and assume that no user or device should have implicit trust or automatic authentication based on network location.

Malicious insiders may use AI tools

AI tools not only empower external cybercriminals but also make it easier for malicious insiders to act within an organization’s network. Malicious insiders can use AI to automate credential harvesting, identify sensitive information or generate believable phishing content. Since insiders often operate with legitimate permissions, detecting privilege misuse requires identifying behavioral anomalies like access beyond defined responsibilities, activity outside normal business hours and repeated activity within critical systems. Eliminating standing access by enforcing Just-in-Time (JIT) access, session monitoring and session recording helps organizations limit exposure and reduce the impact of compromised accounts and insider misuse.

Secure identities against autonomous AI-based cyber attacks

At a time when AI agents can create convincing social engineering campaigns, test credentials at scale and reduce the hands-on effort required to run attacks, AI-enabled cyber attacks are becoming increasingly automated. Protecting both human and Non-Human Identities (NHIs) now requires more than authentication; organizations must implement continuous, context-aware behavioral analysis and granular access controls. Modern Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions like Keeper consolidate behavioral analytics, real-time session monitoring and JIT access to secure identities across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Note: This article was thoughtfully written and contributed for our audience by Ashley D’Andrea, Content Writer at Keeper Security.

Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Google News, Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.


Source link