Colombia’s EGC suspends Doha peace talks over Petro-Trump meeting | Conflict News

0

The Gaitanist Army of Colombia (EGC), the country’s largest criminal organisation, has announced it will temporarily suspend peace talks in Qatar after Colombian President Gustavo Petro reportedly pledged to target its leader.

In a social media post on Wednesday, the EGC, sometimes referred to as the Gulf Clan, indicated the suspension would continue until it received updates from the Petro administration.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“By order of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the EGC delegation at the negotiating table will temporarily suspend talks with the government to consult and clarify the veracity of the information,” the group wrote in a statement on X.

“If the media reports are true, this would be a violation of good faith and the Doha commitments.”

Colombia’s Defence Minister Pedro Sanchez confirmed the reports later on Wednesday, sharing a list of three drug “kingpins” that Petro’s administration would prioritise as “high-level targets”.

Among the three targets was the EGC’s leader, Jesus Avila Villadiego, alias Chiquito Malo. A reward for his capture was set at 5 billion Colombian pesos, equivalent to $1.37m.

The other two “kingpins” included top rebel commanders identified only by their aliases: Ivan Mordisco and Pablito.

The public announcement echoes a private one cemented during a closed-door meeting on Tuesday at the White House, when Petro met United States President Donald Trump in person for the first time.

For months, Trump has pressured the Petro administration to take more “aggressive action” to combat narcotics trafficking out of Colombia.

In response, Petro and his team presented the Trump administration on Tuesday with a dossier on their counter-narcotics operations titled, “Colombia: America’s #1 Ally Against Narcoterrorists”.

The presentation featured statistics on cocaine seizures, programmes to eradicate coca crops, and the high-level arrests and killings of drug lords.

But the commitment to collaborate with the US in the pursuit of Chiquito Malo’s arrest has thrown negotiations with the EGC into peril.

It has also raised questions about the future of Petro’s signature policy, “Total Peace”, which was designed to open talks with rebel groups and criminal networks in an effort to halt Colombia’s six-decade-long internal conflict.

 

The EGC is a major criminal group with almost 10,000 members, according to a recent report by the Ideas for Peace Foundation.

In December, the US also designated the group as a “foreign terrorist organisation”, as part of its ongoing efforts to crack down on drug trafficking.

The EGC has been engaged in high-level discussions with the Colombian government in Doha since September 2025. The two parties signed a “commitment to peace” on December 5, which outlined a roadmap to the EGC putting down arms.

The first step towards demobilisation was for the group to gather its forces in temporary zones, beginning in March. The government had suspended arrest warrants in December for EGC commanders, including Chiquito Malo, who were due to move to these areas.

But the government’s plans to detain the drug lord, declared yesterday at the White House, destabilised this process, according to analysts.

“[The EGC] interpret this as a direct threat where, if any commander who has arrest warrants … goes to the temporary zones, he runs a high risk,” said Gerson Arias, a conflict and security investigator at the Ideas for Peace Foundation, a Bogota-based think tank.

The Colombian Supreme Court in January approved Chiquito Malo’s extradition to the US in the eventuality of his capture, but the final decision to extradite him resides with the president.

By declaring the drug lord a “target” at the White House, Petro signalled support for capturing and extraditing the EGC commander.

 

Potential US involvement in the operation also appears to have unsettled the criminal organisation, according to experts.

“It is very different for Chiquito Malo to be pursued solely by the Colombian government than for him to become a target of joint strategic value involving US intelligence,” said Laura Bonilla, a deputy director at the Peace and Reconciliation Foundation, a Colombian think tank.

Although the EGC suspended its peace talks on Wednesday, it stressed that it remained open to resuming negotiations.

“It should be clarified that the suspension is temporary, not permanent, which indicates that they [the talks] will resume shortly,” a lawyer for the group told Al Jazeera, on condition of anonymity.

The representative added that, for talks to continue, the EGC requires that “legal and personal security guarantees” and “the commitments agreed upon in Doha, Qatar, are fulfilled”.



Source link

Graham Linehan testifies to Congress on UK free speech and culture war issues

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Irish comedy writer Graham Linehan, who has drawn criticism for his comments on transgender issues, testified before Congress Wednesday, arguing that the U.K.’s free speech battles have left “ordinary people” fighting culture-war disputes without clear leadership.

Linehan previewed his message during an appearance earlier that day on “Fox & Friends,” where he criticized U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer for avoiding the debate over transgender policies now playing out in courts, on the streets and online.

“We have a Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, who ran on saying he was going to end the culture wars,” Linehan said. “And all he’s done is hide from them. So ordinary people are actually fighting the culture wars in the U.K. every day.”

BILL MAHER URGES AMERICANS TO UNCONDITIONALLY SUPPORT FREE SPEECH, AVOID BECOMING LIKE BRITAIN

Comedy writer Graham Linehan appears before Congress

Comedy writer and journalist Graham Linehan testifies on “Europe’s Threat to American Speech and Innovation” at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 4, 2026, in Washington, D.C. The hearing highlighted how European censorship laws could impact free speech in the United States. (Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

Linehan pointed to three cases involving nurses he said were harassed, labeled bigots and threatened professionally, blaming what he called “cowardly leadership” for failing to provide clear guidance.

“There was never any admission that they were wrong,” he said, describing one dispute involving women who said they were asked to undress in front of a man.

Linehan also said he was unable to find work after voicing what he described as “basic feminism” rooted in the suffragette movement.

The comedy writer was briefly arrested over his criticism of U.K. transgender policies before police dropped the charges.

WOMEN’S SPORTS ON THE LINE AS SUPREME COURT WRESTLES WITH DEFINING ‘SEX’

Graham Linehan outside court with transgender protest sign

Graham Linehan poses with a placard reading “There’s no such thing as a transgender child” outside Westminster Magistrates Court on Sept. 4, 2025 in London, England. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

He argued for single-sex spaces for women and claimed allowing “men who identify as women” into female-only areas amounts to “a charter for predators” on “Fox & Friends.”

“Now, of course, that’s not to say that all trans-identified people are predators,” he said. “But neither are all men predators. But we keep them all out of the women’s toilets for … reasons that have been established … 100 years ago.”

Linehan said his life was “kind of destroyed by trans activists.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“I had to kind of watch the next 10 years as colleague after colleague condemned me in the press for things they could never explain,” he said.



Source link

DEAD#VAX Malware Campaign Deploys AsyncRAT via IPFS-Hosted VHD Phishing Files

0

Ravie LakshmananFeb 04, 2026Malware / Endpoint Security

Threat hunters have disclosed details of a new, stealthy malware campaign dubbed DEAD#VAX that employs a mix of “disciplined tradecraft and clever abuse of legitimate system features” to bypass traditional detection mechanisms and deploy a remote access trojan (RAT) known as AsyncRAT.

“The attack leverages IPFS-hosted VHD files, extreme script obfuscation, runtime decryption, and in-memory shellcode injection into trusted Windows processes, never dropping a decrypted binary to disk,” Securonix researchers Akshay Gaikwad, Shikha Sangwan, and Aaron Beardslee said in a report shared with The Hacker News.

AsyncRAT is an open-source malware that provides attackers with extensive control over compromised endpoints, enabling surveillance and data collection through keylogging, screen and webcam capture, clipboard monitoring, file system access, remote command execution, and persistence across reboots.

The starting point of the infection sequence is a phishing email delivering a Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) hosted on the decentralized InterPlanetary Filesystem (IPFS) network. The VHD files are disguised as PDF files for purchase orders to deceive targets.

The multi-stage campaign has been funded to leverage Windows Script Files (WSF), heavily obfuscated batch scripts, and self-parsing PowerShell loaders to deliver an encrypted x64 shellcode. The shellcode in question is AsyncRAT, which is injected directly into trusted Windows processes and executed entirely in memory, effectively minimizing any forensic artifacts on disk.

“After downloading, when a user simply tries to open this PDF-looking file and double-clicks it, it mounts as a virtual hard drive,” the researchers explained. “Using a VHD file is a highly specific and effective evasion technique used in modern malware campaigns. This behavior shows how VHD files bypass certain security controls.”

Presented within the newly mounted drive “E:\” is a WSF script that, when executed by the victim, assuming it to be a PDF document, drops and runs an obscured batch script that first runs a series of checks to ascertain if it’s not running inside a virtualized or sandboxed environment, and it has the necessary privileges to proceed further.

Once all the conditions are satisfied, the script unleashes a PowerShell-based process injector and persistence module that’s designed to validate the execution environment, decrypt embedded payloads, set up persistence using scheduled tasks, and inject the final malware into Microsoft-signed Windows processes (e.g., RuntimeBroker.exe, OneDrive.exe, taskhostw.exe, and sihost.exe) to avoid writing the artifacts to disk.

The PowerShell component lays the foundation for a “stealthy, resilient execution engine” that allows the trojan to run entirely in memory and blend into legitimate system activity, thereby allowing for long-term access to compromised environments.

To further enhance the degree of stealth, the malware controls execution timing and throttles execution using sleep intervals in order to reduce CPU usage, avoid suspicious rapid Win32 API activity, and make runtime behavior less anomalous.

“Modern malware campaigns increasingly rely on trusted file formats, script abuse, and memory-resident execution to bypass traditional security controls,” the researchers said. “Rather than delivering a single malicious binary, attackers now construct multi-stage execution pipelines in which each individual component appears benign when analyzed in isolation. This shift has made detection, analysis, and incident response significantly more challenging for defenders.”

“In this specific infection chain, the decision to deliver AsyncRAT as encrypted, memory-resident shellcode significantly increases its stealth. The payload never appears on disk in a recognizable executable form and runs within the context of trusted Windows processes. This fileless execution model makes detection and forensic reconstruction substantially more difficult, allowing AsyncRAT to operate with a reduced risk of discovery by traditional endpoint security controls.”



Source link

Russia criticises US as final nuclear warhead treaty set to expire | Nuclear Weapons News

0

Experts have warned that the expiry of the US-Russia New START treaty could spark a fresh nuclear arms race.

Russia says it is “no longer bound” by limits on the number of nuclear warheads it can deploy, as the last remaining nuclear arms control treaty with the United States is set to expire.

The New START treaty, which was signed in 2010, will expire on Thursday. Russia said that the US had not responded to President Vladimir Putin’s proposal to keep observing the missile and warhead limits in the treaty for another 12 months.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“We assume that the parties to the New START treaty are no longer bound by any obligations or symmetrical declarations within the context of the treaty,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Wednesday.

“Essentially, our ideas are being deliberately ignored. This [US] approach appears mistaken and regrettable,” it said.

New START, which stands for Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, limits the deployment of strategic nuclear weapons, those designed to hit an adversary’s key political, military and industrial centres.

Deployed weapons or warheads are those in active service and available for rapid use as opposed to those that are in storage or awaiting dismantlement.

The expiry of the treaty means that Moscow and Washington will both be free to increase missile numbers and deploy hundreds more strategic warheads, although this poses logistical challenges and will take time.

Despite the expiry of the treaty, US President Donald Trump has expressed interest in a new agreement to restrict nuclear weapons.

During an interview with The New York Times in January, Trump said of the New START treaty: “If it expires, it expires. … We’ll just do a better agreement.”

Trump has also called for China to be involved in any future nuclear talks.

New START was a 10-year agreement signed by then-US President Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Vladimir Putin who served a single term as Russia’s president from 2008 to 2012. It came into effect in 2011.

Fears of new arms race

Security experts say the end of New START risks ushering in a new arms race that will also be fuelled by China’s rapid nuclear build-up.

“Without the treaty, each side will be free to upload hundreds of additional warheads onto their deployed missiles and heavy bombers, roughly doubling the sizes of their currently deployed arsenals in the most maximalist scenario,” Matt Korda, associate director for the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, told Reuters News Agency.

As the clock ticked towards the treaty’s expiry on Thursday, Pope Leo urged both sides to not abandon the limits set in the treaty.

“I issue an urgent appeal not to let this instrument lapse,” the first US-born pope said at his weekly audience. “It is more urgent than ever to replace the logic of fear and distrust with a shared ethic, capable of guiding choices toward the common good.”



Source link

House Republicans move to block DC from stopping Trump tax cuts on tipped workers

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The House of Representatives passed a bill on Wednesday aimed at stopping the Washington, D.C. local government from blocking parts of President Donald Trump’s new tax law.

D.C.’s progressive city council passed a local measure to stop certain parts of Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” from going into effect due to their expected effect of cutting city revenues. 

Policies that would have been blocked include Trump’s elimination of taxes on tipped and overtime wages, as well as certain tax cuts aimed at businesses.

The legislation was led by Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, who told Fox News Digital he did not expect any Democrats to support his bill.

GOP UNVEILS PLAN TO CUT DEFICIT BY $1 TRILLION WITH SECOND ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’

Trump signs the Big Beautiful Bill

President Donald Trump signs sweeping spending and tax legislation, known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” during a picnic with military families to mark Independence Day, at the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025. (Ken Cedeno/Reuters)

“Republicans want more money to be in the hands and in the pockets of working-class families, and Democrats want that money to be in the hands of government,” Gill said.

The D.C. government generally conforms with large swaths of the federal tax code, as a federal territory itself.

But according to local officials, including non-voting Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., enacting the full Trump tax bill would amount to a $600 million revenue loss for the city.

TRUMP SIGNS ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL’ BILL IN SWEEPING VICTORY FOR SECOND TERM AGENDA, OVERCOMING DEMS AND GOP REBELS

Congressman Brandon Gill

Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, leaves the House Republican Conference caucus meeting in the Capitol in Washington, May 6, 2025. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

“This resolution is nothing short of unprecedented and deliberate administrative and fiscal sabotage of D.C.,” Norton said in a statement.

But Republicans, including Gill, argue that the capital’s progressive officials are blocking Trump’s signature legislation for political reasons at the cost of working-class residents.

“Whenever we passed that tax law, we expected Washington, D.C. to conform to those tax provisions. And unfortunately, they decided that they were going to try to separate from them,” Gill said.

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., is seen during a House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee hearing in Washington, D.C., July 23, 2025. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“So to give you a few examples, you have no tax on tips, no tax on social security, no tax on overtime pay, a variety of pro-growth, pro-business tax provisions that they decided they wanted to decouple from. So what we’re saying is, we think that that’s bad policy on D.C.’s part, and we’re gonna stop them.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Congress has the ability to overturn most local laws set by D.C. thanks to the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973.

If passed by both the House and Senate, however, Republicans’ bill could complicate the tax season for D.C. residents who have already begun filing for their annual returns.



Source link

What is Tarique Rahman’s vision for Bangladesh? | TV Shows

0

Sreenivasan Jain challenges BNP secretary Mirza Fakhrul on whether the party and its leader really represents change.

Bangladesh is heading into a historic election after the 2024 uprising that toppled Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and sidelined the Awami League. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party has emerged as the frontrunner after years on the margins.

In this interview, Sreenivasan Jain speaks to BNP Secretary-General Mirza Fakhrul Alamgir about Tarique Rahman’s vision for the country and whether the BNP genuinely represents political change.

Guest:
Mirza Fakhrul Alamgir – Secretary-general, Bangladesh Nationalist Party



Source link

Federal probe launched into Waymo crash in Santa Monica school zone

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Federal safety regulators are once again taking a hard look at self-driving cars after a serious incident involving Waymo, the autonomous vehicle company owned by Alphabet.

This time, the investigation centers on a Waymo vehicle that struck a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica, California, during morning drop-off hours. The crash happened on Jan. 23 and raised immediate questions about how autonomous vehicles behave around children, school zones and unpredictable pedestrian movement.

On Jan. 29, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirmed it has opened a new preliminary investigation into Waymo’s automated driving system.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

TESLA’S SELF-DRIVING CARS UNDER FIRE AGAIN

A Waymo taxi parked in front of a line of cars

Waymo operates Level 4 self-driving vehicles in select U.S. cities, where the car controls all driving tasks without a human behind the wheel. (AP Photo/Terry Chea, File)

What happened near the Santa Monica school?

According to documents posted by NHTSA, the crash occurred within two blocks of an elementary school during normal drop-off hours. The area was busy. There were multiple children present, a crossing guard on duty and several vehicles double-parked along the street.

Investigators say the child ran into the roadway from behind a double-parked SUV while heading toward the school. The Waymo vehicle struck the child, who suffered minor injuries. No safety operator was inside the vehicle at the time.

NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation is now examining whether the autonomous system exercised appropriate caution given its proximity to a school zone and the presence of young pedestrians.

AI TRUCK SYSTEM MATCHES TOP HUMAN DRIVERS IN MASSIVE SAFETY SHOWDOWN WITH PERFECT SCORES

A Waymo taxi sensor

Federal investigators are now examining whether Waymo’s automated system exercised enough caution near a school zone during morning drop-off hours. (Waymo)

Why federal investigators stepped in

NHTSA says the investigation will focus on how Waymo’s automated driving system is designed to behave in and around school zones, especially during peak pickup and drop-off times.

That includes whether the vehicle followed posted speed limits, how it responded to visual cues like crossing guards and parked vehicles and whether its post-crash response met federal safety expectations. The agency is also reviewing how Waymo handled the incident after it occurred.

Waymo said it voluntarily contacted regulators the same day as the crash and plans to cooperate fully with the investigation. In a statement, the company said it remains committed to improving road safety for riders and everyone sharing the road.

Waymo responds to the federal investigation

We reached out to Waymo for comment, and the company provided the following statement:

“At Waymo, we are committed to improving road safety, both for our riders and all those with whom we share the road. Part of that commitment is being transparent when incidents occur, which is why we are sharing details regarding an event in Santa Monica, California, on Friday, January 23, where one of our vehicles made contact with a young pedestrian. Following the event, we voluntarily contacted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that same day. NHTSA has indicated to us that they intend to open an investigation into this incident, and we will cooperate fully with them throughout the process. 

The event occurred when the pedestrian suddenly entered the roadway from behind a tall SUV, moving directly into our vehicle’s path. Our technology immediately detected the individual as soon as they began to emerge from behind the stopped vehicle. The Waymo Driver braked hard, reducing speed from approximately 17 mph to under 6 mph before contact was made. 

To put this in perspective, our peer-reviewed model shows that a fully attentive human driver in this same situation would have made contact with the pedestrian at approximately 14 mph. This significant reduction in impact speed and severity is a demonstration of the material safety benefit of the Waymo Driver.

Following contact, the pedestrian stood up immediately, walked to the sidewalk, and we called 911. The vehicle remained stopped, moved to the side of the road, and stayed there until law enforcement cleared the vehicle to leave the scene. 

This event demonstrates the critical value of our safety systems. We remain committed to improving road safety where we operate as we continue on our mission to be the world’s most trusted driver.”

Understanding Waymo’s autonomy level

Waymo vehicles fall under Level 4 autonomy on NHTSA’s six-level scale.

At Level 4, the vehicle handles all driving tasks within specific service areas. A human driver is not required to intervene, and no safety operator needs to be present inside the car. However, these systems do not operate everywhere and are currently limited to ride-hailing services in select cities.

NHTSA has been clear that Level 4 vehicles are not available for consumer purchase, even though passengers may ride inside them.

This is not Waymo’s first federal probe

This latest investigation follows a previous NHTSA evaluation that opened in May 2024. That earlier probe examined reports of Waymo vehicles colliding with stationary objects like gates, chains and parked cars. Regulators also reviewed incidents where the vehicles appeared to disobey traffic control devices.

That investigation was closed in July 2025 after regulators reviewed the data and Waymo’s responses. Safety advocates say the new incident highlights unresolved concerns.

UBER UNVEILS A NEW ROBOTAXI WITH NO DRIVER BEHIND THE WHEEL

View of a Waymo Jaguar driver seat

No safety operator was inside the vehicle at the time of the crash, raising fresh questions about how autonomous cars handle unpredictable situations involving children. (Waymo)

What this means for you

If you live in a city where self-driving cars operate, this investigation matters more than it might seem. School zones are already high-risk areas, even for attentive human drivers. Autonomous vehicles must be able to detect unpredictable behavior, anticipate sudden movement and respond instantly when children are present.

This case will likely influence how regulators set expectations for autonomous driving systems near schools, playgrounds and other areas with vulnerable pedestrians. It could also shape future rules around local oversight, data reporting, and operational limits for self-driving fleets.

For parents, commuters, and riders, the outcome may affect where and when autonomous vehicles are allowed to operate.

Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP    

Kurt’s key takeaways

Self-driving technology promises safer roads, fewer crashes and less human error. But moments like this remind us that the hardest driving scenarios often involve human unpredictability, especially when children are involved. Federal investigators now face a crucial question: Did the system act as cautiously as it should have in one of the most sensitive driving environments possible? How they answer that question could help define the next phase of autonomous vehicle regulation in the United States.

Do you feel comfortable sharing the road with self-driving cars near schools, or is that a line technology should not cross yet? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter. 

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.



Source link

Anthropic keeps Claude ad-free • The Register

0

Anthropic has taken the high road by committing to keep its Claude AI model family free of advertising.

“There are many good places for advertising,” the company announced on Wednesday. “A conversation with Claude is not one of them.”

Rival OpenAI has taken a different path and is planning to present promotional material to its free and Go tier customers.

With its abjuration of sponsorship, Anthropic is leaning into its messaging that principles matter, a market position reinforced by recent reports about the company’s clash with the Pentagon over safeguards. 

“We want Claude to act unambiguously in our users’ interests,” the company said. “So we’ve made a choice: Claude will remain ad-free. Our users won’t see ‘sponsored’ links adjacent to their conversations with Claude; nor will Claude’s responses be influenced by advertisers or include third-party product placements our users did not ask for.”

That choice may follow in part from how Anthropic’s customer base, and its path toward possible profitability, differ from rivals.

Anthropic has focused on business customers. According to The Information, “The vast majority of Anthropic’s $4.5 billion in revenue last year stemmed from selling access to its AI models through an application programming interface to coding startups Cursor and Cognition, as well as other companies such as Microsoft and Canva.”

For OpenAI, on the other hand, 75 percent of its revenue comes from consumers, according to Bloomberg. And given the rate at which OpenAI has been spending money – an expected $17 billion in cash burn this year, up from $9 billion in 2025, according to The Economist – ad revenue looks like a necessity.

Other major US AI companies – Google, Meta, Microsoft (to the extent its technology can be disentangled from OpenAI), and xAI – all have substantial advertising operations. (xAI, which acquired X last year, absorbed the social media company’s ad business, said to have generated about $2.26 billion in 2025, according to eMarketer.)

Anthropic’s concern is that serving ads in chat sessions would introduce incentives to maximize engagement. And that might get in the way of making the chatbot helpful and might undermine trust – to the extent people trust error-prone models deemed dangerous enough to need guardrails.

“Users shouldn’t have to second-guess whether an AI is genuinely helping them or subtly steering the conversation towards something monetizable,” the AI biz said.

The incentive to undermine privacy is what worries the Center for Democracy and Technology.

“Business models based on targeted advertising in chatbot outputs, for example, will create incentives to collect as much user information as possible, including potentially from the highly personal conversations some users have with chatbots, which inexorably will raise risks to user privacy,” the advocacy group said in a recent report.

Melissa Anderson, president of Search.com, which offers a free, ad-supported version of ChatGPT for web search, told The Register in a phone interview that she disagrees with Anthropic’s premise that an AI service can’t be neutral while serving ads.

“They’re kind of saying it’s one or the other and I don’t think that’s the case,” Anderson said. “And here’s a great example: The New York Times sells advertising. The Wall Street Journal sells advertising. And so I think what they’re conflating is the concept that maybe advertisers are gonna somehow spoil the editorial content.”

At Search.com and at some of the other large LLMs, she said, there’s a commitment to the natural, organic LLM answer not being affected by advertisers.

Anthropic’s view, she said, is valid but extreme. “The advertising industry for a long time has recognized that having too many ads is definitely a bad thing,” she said. “But it’s possible in a world where there’s the right volume of ads, and those ads are relevant and interesting and helpful to the consumer, then it’s a positive thing.”

Iesha White, director of intelligence for Check My Ads, a non-profit ad watchdog group, took the opposite view, telling The Register in an email, “We applaud Anthropic’s decision to forgo an ad-supported monetization model.

“Anthropic’s recognition of the importance of its role as a true agent of its users is both refreshing and innovative. It puts Anthropic’s trust-centered approach in stark contrast to its peers and incumbents.”

Other AI companies, she said, pointing to Meta, Perplexity, and ChatGPT, have chosen to adopt an ad monetization model that, by design, depends upon user data extraction.

“This data – including people’s deepest thoughts, hopes, and fears –  is then packaged to sell ads to the highest bidders,” said White. “Anthropic has recognized that an ad-supported model would create incentives that undermine user trust as well as the company’s own broader vision. Anthropic’s choice reminds one of Google’s original but now jettisoned motto, ‘Don’t be evil.’ Let’s hope that Anthropic’s resolve to do right by its customers is stronger than Google’s was.” ®



Source link

Six British activists acquitted over raid on Israeli defence firm’s factory | Protests

0

NewsFeed

Six British ‍activists ‍have been acquitted of aggravated burglary relating to a 2024 raid on ⁠a factory operated by Israeli defence firm Elbit. They were members of the now-banned organisation, Palestine Action.



Source link

‘Squad’ member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attacks CBS editor-in-chief Bari Weiss

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., attacked CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss on Tuesday in a rant against the media and said the network executive “killed” a “60 Minutes” segment on El Salvador’s maximum-security prison that aired in January.

Ocasio-Cortez said during an appearance on ex-CNN host Don Lemon’s show that MS NOW, CNN and CBS were home to some of the “best journalists” in the U.S., before taking aim at Weiss in an argument against what she says is the “oligarchical ownership structure” of media.

“We saw what happened with that ’60 Minutes’ piece on [Center for Confinement of Terrorism] CECOT. Bari Weiss killed it. And she’s not there because she’s a good journalist; she’s there because she kisses billionaire butt, and she makes them look good, and she executes on the censorship agenda that they want to see put out,” Ocasio-Cortez told Lemon.

The CECOT “60 Minutes” segment aired on Jan. 18, after initially being delayed by Weiss at the end of December. 

CBS, BARI WEISS FACING MOUNTING BACKLASH FROM LIBERAL CRITICS OVER YANKING ’60 MINUTES’ SEGMENT

Ocasio-Cortez and Bari Weiss

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speaks in New York on Jan. 1, 2026. Bari Weiss speaks onstage during Book Club Event With Peggy Noonan on Nov. 19, 2024, in New York City. (Timothy A.Clary/AFP via Getty Images; Noam Galai/Getty Images for The Free Press)

Fox News Digital reported that Weiss made the decision to delay the segment after determining that, while the interviews were “powerful,” the story ultimately did not “advance the ball” and “was not ready.”

CBS News and Ocasio-Cortez’s office did not immediately return Fox News Digital’s requests for comment.

Ocasio-Cortez also took aim at The Washington Post, which is owned by billionaire Jeff Bezos.

“So now, it’s not just that these companies are very big, but that they answer to one very specifically, usually one billionaire with a very vested political agenda,” she said. “And so you have Jeff Bezos, who takes over the Washington Post — not because he loves journalism, but because he needs to start controlling and ensuring that dissenting opinions do not get aired in papers of record.”

“And so it’s not a coincidence, then, that you’ve got Jeff Bezos that takes over the Washington Post and then immediately takes over their opinion section, starts to take over their coverage of the 2024 election.”

The Washington Post did not immediately return Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

WHO IS SHARYN ALFONSI? ’60 MINUTES’ CORRESPONDENT IS ALLEGING POLITICAL INTERFERENCE IN HER STORY ON CECOT

Bezos has owned the Post since 2013 and the paper announced in 2024 that it would not be endorsing a political candidate in the 2024 election or any election going forward.

Ocasio-Cortez said the “same thing” happened with the Los Angeles Times. That outlet’s editorial board also declined to endorse a presidential candidate in 2024.

Bezos also announced changes to the Post opinion section in early 2025, saying, “We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

AOC speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., talks with reporters outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 11, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Ocasio-Cortez continued to criticize CBS, citing the network canceling “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.” 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“So you’ve got Larry Ellison, Jeff Bezos, you’ve got Elon Musk, you’ve got people that are starting to control and take over the content of what happens. It’s not a coincidence that this consolidation happens at CBS and then Stephen Colbert, who is a major critic of the president, gets de-platformed; Jimmy Kimmel gets threatened through Disney. And this is the goal,” she said.



Source link