A week ago, DP World Tour golfer Yurav Premlall missed the cut in the Turkish Airlines Open by nine shots. Fast-forward to this Sunday, and his performance looks very different as the South African stunned the golf world with a 14-shot win at the Catalunya Championship.

Golf is a fickle game, but the performance the 22-year-old put together in Spain for his maiden victory on the European circuit is stunning on every level imaginable. We’re talking about a player who began the week without a top-30 finish in eight starts this season turning around and finishing just one off the all-time biggest margin of victory set by Tiger Woods at the 2000 U.S. Open.

Yurav Premlall of South Africa celebrates victory on the 18th green on day four of the Estrella Damm Catalunya Championship 2026 at Real Club de Golf el Prat on May 10, 2026 in Barcelona, Spain. (Photo by Luke Walker/Getty Images) (Luke Walker/Getty Images)

SUNGJAE IM HITS TRULY BIZARRE BUNKER SHOT THAT RICOCHETS OFF GRANDSTAND ONLY TO END UP BACK AT HIS FEET

Premlall, who entered the event ranked No. 598 in the Official World Golf Ranking, began the week with a 2-under round of 70 on Thursday. More than respectable given he had missed four out of eight cuts this season, but it still left him six shots back with 54 holes to play.

Then came Friday, when it appears Premlall woke up a completely new man.

He carded a second round score of 64, which he then followed with a 63 on Saturday to enter Sunday’s final round five shots clear of the chasing pack.

Yurav Premlall of South Africa celebrates victory with the trophy on the 18th green on day four of the Estrella Damm Catalunya Championship 2026 at Real Club de Golf el Prat on May 10, 2026 in Barcelona, Spain. (Photo by Stuart Franklin/Getty Images) (Stuart Franklin/Getty Images)

Any player, especially one who has yet to find the winner’s circle, would sign up for a five-shot cushion with 18 holes to play. Still, it’s also a unique spot that most players have never experienced at the professional level. So while many would have expected Premlall to take at least a half-step back and make things somewhat interesting on Sunday, that simply did not happen.

The South African made birdie on six of his opening nine holes, picked up another four birdies down the stretch, and managed to post his second consecutive round of 63 to secure the insanely impressive 14-shot victory at 28-under par.

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

“No words,” Premlall said after securing victory. “I’ve worked so hard to get into this position and it’s so rewarding to finally see the results of it. I mean, the last eight, nine months have been such a struggle just to build myself onto a platform where I know I could give myself a chance to win and to end up obviously in this position. I’m just so grateful so it’s a dream come true.”

Yurav Premlall of South Africa walks onto the 18th green on day four of the Estrella Damm Catalunya Championship 2026 at Real Club de Golf el Prat on May 10, 2026 in Barcelona, Spain. (Photo by Stuart Franklin/Getty Images) (Stuart Franklin/Getty Images)

OUTKICK IS NOW ON THE FOX APP: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD

With his back-to-back rounds of 9-under across the weekend, Premlall could have theoretically skipped the first two rounds of the tournament and still won by four shots.

Fellow South African Shaun Norris finished in solo second.

Costco’s new chicken tenders are gaining attention online — but shoppers aren’t exactly sold.

A TikTok video showing the oversized tenders has racked up thousands of views, with users reacting to both the portion size and calorie count. The video, filmed at a Costco location in Schaumburg, Illinois, shows a five-piece order priced at $6.99.

The item has appeared at select Costco locations across the U.S., with some customers noting it may be replacing the calzone at certain stores.

COSTCO SHOPPERS RAVE ABOUT ‘DELICIOUSLY ADDICTIVE’ SUMMER TREAT THAT’S GONE VIRAL

It is unclear how widely the tenders are available or whether Costco plans a nationwide rollout.

Costco’s new food court chicken tenders are getting attention online. (Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

Chicken tenders are not entirely new to Costco, however. The item has been available at some international locations, including Canada and Australia, in recent years, food-focused publication TastingTable reported.

The meal includes several large chicken tenders served with dipping sauce, quickly drawing buzz across social media as customers share photos.

COSTCO WORKER REVEALS BAKED GOODS AREN’T SOLD HOT TO PREVENT CONDENSATION THAT CAN LEAD TO MOLD GROWTH AND SHORTEN SHELF LIFE

The reaction online, however, has been mixed.

Some shoppers questioned what the tenders might be replacing.

“What did they get rid of? The calzone?” one user asked.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

Fox News Digital reached out to Costco for comment.

The meal (not pictured) includes large chicken tenders served with dipping sauce, with some shoppers wondering if it may replace items like the calzone. (iStock)

Others focused less on the menu change and more on the calorie count.

The TikTok video shows the tenders total 1,640 calories, prompting strong reactions from viewers and questions about how the number could be so high.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES

Some shoppers speculated the dipping sauce may be responsible for a large portion of the calories.

Still, not everyone was critical.

“Those look amazing,” one user wrote, while others said they were eager to try the item if it expands to more locations.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Fox News Digital previously reported that Costco recently reintroduced churros in a new format, though the change drew mixed reactions from shoppers.

People online paid attention to the high calorie count, as the TikTok video shows the Costco tenders have 1,640 calories. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg/Getty Images)

Instead of the traditional full-size pastry, the retailer rolled out a caramel churro sundae topped with smaller churro pieces.

Some longtime customers expressed disappointment, saying they preferred the original version that had been a staple for years.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Others welcomed the update, noting that Costco frequently rotates items on its food court menu depending on demand and availability.

Deirdre Bardolf of Fox News Digital contributed reporting.

President Donald Trump has chimed in on the NFL’s fight to retain its antitrust exemption amid probes by the FCC and Justice Department that could seriously affect the league’s business model if it loses its exemption.

At the center of the issue is whether the NFL’s shift of games onto Netflix, Amazon, YouTube and Peacock has become too expensive for average fans to access, which in turn could be a violation of the Sports Broadcasting Act and the antitrust exemption the act grants the league.

In a wide-ranging interview involving other subjects on the president’s plate, reporter Sharyl Attkisson asked if the NFL is “price gouging” and whether the administration is going to do anything about it.

“It’s tough,” Trump replied. “You got people that love football. They’re great people, they don’t make enough money to go and pay this. It’s tough. And [the NFL] could be killing the golden goose, I mean to have that stupid kickoff thing that you can’t watch, it’s unwatchable. I hate the games where they, you know, they have the new phony kickoff. I don’t think it’s any safer. I hope college football doesn’t do that.”

President Donald Trump walks onto the field before Super Bowl LIX between the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, La., on Feb. 9, 2025. (Jamie Squire/Getty Images)

TRUMP SAYS NFL’S NEW KICKOFF RULE ‘ACTUALLY MAKES FOOTBALL MORE DANGEROUS’

Got it, the president is not a fan of the NFL’s so-called dynamic kickoff that the league says has lowered the number of head injuries in its games.

Anyway, back to the subject at hand — the NFL’s growing relationship with streaming services and the cost of adding those for fans.

“…They have to be careful because others have tried this and all of a sudden you don’t have a sport anymore,” Trump said. “Probably will.”

Did the president just say his administration will step in?

“It’s something, there’s something very sad when they take football away from many, many people, very sad. I don’t like it,” Trump said.

Again, is the government stepping in?

NFL PUSHES DEEPER INTO STREAMING AS NETFLIX LANDS AUSTRALIA GAME AMID FCC, DOJ SCRUTINY

President Donald Trump’s FCC is seeking public comments on the shift of live sports from broadcast channels to streaming services. (Getty Images)

“I don’t know,” Trump said. “I don’t, but I don’t like it. I don’t like it. They’re making a lot of money. They could make a little bit less … You’ve got people that live for Sunday. They live, they can’t think about anything else, and then all of a sudden they’re going to have to pay $1,000 a game?

“It’s crazy, so, I’m not happy about it.”

For the record, no one pays $1,000 to watch an NFL game on a streaming service. But the cost of adding the multiple streaming platforms the NFL is now doing business with, plus the cost of cable or satellite service to have all games available on a given game day, could easily eclipse $1,000 per season.

And while that is potentially a lower cost than, say, a family of four actually attending a game once one figures in tickets, parking and concession purchases of food and beverages, that’s not the point.

The point is the NFL enjoys a government-provided antitrust exemption that has become the cornerstone of its business model.

That exemption passed by Congress in the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 and signed into law by President John F. Kennedy allows the NFL to negotiate massive league-wide broadcast deals with networks.

NFL MOUNTS A BLITZ AT FCC TO PROTECT ITS BUSINESS MODEL

President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office as Washington Commanders owner Josh Harris, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser listen during an event on May 5, 2025, in Washington. (Alex Brandon/AP)

And that has benefited the league in ways Major League Baseball and other leagues have not because those broadcast rights are typically the highest in American sports and the NFL shares those revenues evenly among its teams.

So there are no poor teams competing with rich teams. And that makes the NFL more competitive to the point smaller-market teams such as the Kansas City Chiefs can author a dynasty with multiple Super Bowl wins even as big-market teams such as the New York Jets or New York Giants aren’t automatically good simply because they have more money to spend.

At issue is that the Sports Broadcasting Act only covers over-the-air television and not the relatively new streaming services that are expensive for some consumers.

So the government probes by the FCC and DOJ are questioning whether the 1961 act is being violated by 2020s-era broadcasting rights to pay streaming services.

OUTKICK IS NOW ON THE FOX APP: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD

So, while the NFL’s business model depends on centralized control of its media rights allowed under the antitrust exemption, adding streaming to that model makes restrictive bundling harder to justify.

We now know what side the president is on.

FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO

Virginia Democrats’ redistricting push was meant to lock in an advantage. Instead, it’s unraveling after a costly court defeat—triggering a growing blame game inside the party.

The high-stakes effort to redraw congressional maps, backed by tens of millions of dollars and significant political capital, briefly delivered a narrow on-paper win. But in a 4–3 ruling, the Virginia Supreme Court struck down the maps, citing legal deficiencies, and forced a redraw—wiping out those gains.

Democrats are left arguing over whether party leaders ignored legal warnings and pushed a strategy that was always at risk of collapsing.

DAVID MARCUS: VIRGINIA DEMOCRATS STEP ON A $70M RAKE AND NOW THEY’RE CRYING

In hindsight, critics say the outcome was avoidable. Republicans had urged an earlier court review before votes were cast and money spent, a step they argued could have clarified the maps’ legality. 

Democrats pressed ahead anyway, betting the strategy would hold.

“Violating the Virginia Constitution and bypassing the rule of law to further one’s own political power is wrong,” Rep. Jen Kiggans, R-Va., said in a statement to The Hill. “Had [Democratic Gov.] Abigail Spanberger and the rest of Virginia’s Democrats succeeded, they would have caused irreparable harm to our democracy and disenfranchised millions of Virginians.”

Allies of Spanberger say legal concerns were raised early and not fully heeded, pointing to state lawmakers for pushing forward. Lawmakers and other Democrats counter that litigation was inevitable and the maps were defensible.

DEMS WHO RAN ON AFFORDABILITY NOW FACE BACKLASH AS COSTS CLIMB IN NY, VIRGINIA

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger delivers a response to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address. (Steve Helber/Reuters)

The dispute reflects a broader divide within the party over how aggressively to pursue redistricting. Some Democrats argue such efforts are necessary to counter Republican-led maps nationwide.

“I feel like the system is fundamentally broken, but let’s be clear. Republicans began the redistricting arms race,” Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., told Fox News Digital in an earlier interview. “And so Democrats are left with no choice but to level the playing field for the sake of democracy.”

“Look, in a perfect world, we wouldn’t have political gerrymandering,” Rep. Christian Menefee, D-Texas, added. “But because we don’t live in that world, we’ve got to fight fire with fire.”

Others, however, are more blunt in assigning blame.

“I put this all on Democrats,” Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, said, arguing the party failed to respond forcefully to earlier GOP redistricting efforts and is now facing the consequences.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Voters attend an Arlington Democrats redistricting vote watch party during a special election in Arlington, Va., on Tuesday, April 21, 2026. (Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg)

The fallout is landing at a difficult moment.

A federal raid on May 6 on the office of a powerful state senator has added to a sense of instability, while former Gov. L. Douglas Wilder has suggested the turmoil could give Spanberger an opening to reset and impose discipline on a still-fractured political operation.

The episode underscores the growing role of courts in redistricting fights—and the risks of pushing legal boundaries in a high-stakes environment, with potential implications for control of Virginia’s congressional delegation.

In retrospect, even with the narrow 4–3 decision, it’s a steep price: roughly $70 million and much of Spanberger’s political capital spent on a campaign that won the battle but lost the war.

Democrats are left to sort out not just what went wrong—but who’s responsible.

Fox News Digital’s Leo Briceno contributed to this report.