Reference #18.84adc17.1778419392.155711fd
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.84adc17.1778419392.155711fd
Access Denied
Access Denied
Reference #18.c5d07868.1778416588.3a9843c0
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.c5d07868.1778416588.3a9843c0
Source link
Access Denied
Reference #18.490dde17.1778416791.2ee0980e
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.490dde17.1778416791.2ee0980e
AOC says her ambition is bigger than just holding a presidential title
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is not quite ready to announce a run in the 2028 Democratic primary, because she said her ambition is far greater than that.
“They assume that my ambition is positional; they assume that my ambition is a title or a seat,” Ocasio-Cortez told Democratic strategist David Axelrod at an event Friday in Chicago. “And my ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country.”
“Presidents come and go; Senate, House seats, elected officials come and go, but single-payer healthcare is forever,” she continued. “A living wage is forever. Workers’ rights are forever. Women’s rights, all of that.”
Ocasio-Cortez was responding to criticism of her comments that billionaires like Elon Musk cannot truly “earn” a billion dollars without the work of others, calling the blowback “a veiled threat” against her running for president.
AOC CALLED OUT FOR CLAIM THAT BILLIONAIRES ‘CAN’T EARN’ THEIR WEALTH AS SHE DOUBLES DOWN ON REMARKS
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, D-N.Y., dodged a question on whether she wants to run for president in 2028 by saying her ambition is way bigger than that. (Chet Strange/Getty Images)
“This was the elite saying, if you want this job, you just stepped out of line,” she said. “And we want you to know where the real power is, and it’s in the modern-day barons who own The [Washington] Post and own the algorithms, and we’re going to — we’ll make an example out of you.”
She said critics misunderstand what drives her political decisions: “What use is a gavel, what use is a seat if it doesn’t result in anyone’s life changing for the better. She does not aim for the top, but from it.
“When you haven’t been fantasizing about being this or that since you were seven years old, it is tremendously liberating,” she said. “Because I get to wake up every day and say, how am I going to meet the moment?
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., says she can change the country from the House, Senate, White House or the mountains of Upstate New York ‘being a burnout.’ (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)
“And conditions change radically all the time. So I make my response less to an attachment to some positional, like, you know, title or position and working backwards from there.
“But I make decisions by waking up in the morning, looking out the window, and observing the conditions of this country. And saying, ‘What move or decision can I make today that’s going to get us closer to that future, stronger, faster, and better than yesterday?'”
The New York Democrat made an early realization of the competition in America, walking onto the Senate floor as a freshman House member and thinking, “Wow, everyone here thinks they’re going to be president.”
WATCH: AOC LEAVES DOOR OPEN FOR 2028 PRESIDENTIAL BID AS CAMPAIGN BUZZ SOARS
“And they are making decisions from that place,” she said. “And I don’t want to make decisions from a place of, what’s in it for me? I want to make decisions from a place of, how are we going to change the country?”
Ocasio-Cortez did not rule out any future office, saying she could pursue her goals from multiple places, regardless of big media’s attempts to spin her away from her ambitions.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“No billionaire can stop that: No concentrated level of power and no elite, no gatekeeper, can prevent me from doing everything I can, waking up every day in service of the working class,” she said. “I can do that in the House, in the Senate. I can do that in the White House.
“I can do it from a shack in upstate New York chopping wood and being a burnout. I can do it from anywhere.”
Source link
Jim Miller beats Jared Gordon at UFC 328 return after son beats cancer
MMA fighters prep for UFC Freedom 250
Mixed martial artists Michael Chandler and Bo Nickal preview the UFC Freedom 250 fight set to take place in front of the White House on ‘My View with Lara Trump.’
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
UFC great Jim Miller had an emotional return to the Octagon on Saturday night where he was able to pick up a victory via submission over Jared Gordon.
Miller’s son Wyatt was diagnosed with a rare cancer of the soft tissue, known as rhabdomyosarcoma, last year, according to the New York Post. He hadn’t fought in the UFC in over a year as he stood by his 14-year-old son’s side for the fight. Wyatt recovered and Miller paid tribute to him after the victory.
ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!
Jim Miller reacts after a submission victory against Jared Gordon in a lightweight fight during the UFC 328 event at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J., on May 9, 2026. (Ed Mulholland/Zuffa LLC)
“My son went through some really difficult times in the last couple of months,” he said at UFC 328, which took place at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. “He ended up kicking the s— out of cancer, and he’s all good today.
“We are cancer free. And one of the things I told him when he was dealing with it when he first got diagnosed is Millers have been called a lot of names over the years, but fragile has never been one of them.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
Jim Miller reacts during his fight against Jared Gordon at UFC 328 at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J., on May 9, 2026. (John Jones/Imagn Images)
Miller won the bout in front of home-state fans. Miller was born in Sparta, seated on the edge of Lake Mohawk and about 40 miles from where UFC 328 occurred.
The lightweight bout ended in the first round as Miller put Gordon in a guillotine choke. Gordon went for a takedown after Miller tried to kick him. However, Gordon kept his head down and it allowed Miller to wrap his arms around his opponent to choke him out.
Miller has 28 wins in the UFC – the most of any competitor in the company’s history.
Jim Miller fights Jared Gordon during UFC 328 at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J., on May 9, 2026. (John Jones/Imagn Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Gordon now has consecutive losses for the first time since he lost to Carlos Diego Ferreira at UFC Fight Night in February 2018 and lost to Joaquim Silva at UFC on FOX in December 2018.
Source link
US-Iran ceasefire under strain as Gulf states report drone attacks | US-Israel war on Iran News
A fragile ceasefire in the US-Israel war on Iran is coming under growing strain as several Gulf countries have reported drone attacks.
Qatar said on Sunday that a drone struck a cargo ship in Qatari waters, sparking a fire, while Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates said they repelled drone attacks.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of listThough no Gulf country reported casualties in the latest attacks, they have put pressure on the fragile ceasefire, which took effect on April 8.
Qatar’s Ministry of Defence said the freighter had been arriving in the country’s waters from the UAE capital, Abu Dhabi, and was hit by a drone northeast of the port of Mesaieed.
“The vessel continued its journey toward Mesaieed Port after the fire was brought under control,” the ministry said.
The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said a bulk carrier reported being struck by an “unknown projectile”, and a small fire had been extinguished, but there were no casualties from the incident. “There is no reported environmental impact,” it said.
Kuwait’s Defence Ministry said a “number of hostile drones” were detected in the country’s airspace at dawn. In a post on X, a spokesperson said the drones were dealt with “in accordance with established procedures”, but did not specify where the drones were launched from.
The UAE Defence Ministry said two Iranian drones were intercepted.
“UAE air defence systems successfully engaged two UAVs launched from Iran,” the ministry said in a statement on X.
Ceasefire tested
The Trump administration has said the truce is still in effect, but a naval battle has been taking place in the Gulf region, with Iran restricting traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which a fifth of traded oil transited before the war, and the United States imposing a blockade of Iranian ports.
Several attacks have been reported on ships in the Gulf and the countries in the region over the past week.
On Friday, the US struck two Iranian oil tankers, saying they were trying to breach its blockade of Iran’s ports.
On Tuesday, the UAE said it came under attack from Iranian missiles and drones for the second day in a row. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), however, denied the claim.
The IRGC Navy on Sunday reiterated its warning that any attack on Iranian oil tankers or commercial vessels would be met with a “heavy assault” on one of the bases in the region used by US forces and enemy ships.
The spokesperson for the Iranian parliament’s foreign policy and security committee, Ebrahim Rezaei, said Tehran’s “restraint is over”.
“Any aggression against our vessels will be met with a heavy and decisive Iranian response against American vessels and bases,” Rezaei wrote on X.
“The clock is ticking against the Americans’ interests; it is to their benefit not to act foolishly and sink themselves deeper into the quagmire they have fallen into. The best course is to surrender and concede concessions. You must get used to the new regional order,” he added.
Talks to end the war
While the truce remains in effect, President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to resume the US bombardment if Iran does not accept a deal which includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz and rolling back its nuclear programme.
Iran is still mulling its response to a 14-point proposal by Washington, with Iranian frozen assets and war reparations among other main sticking points.
In a meeting with US Secretary of State Marc Rubio on Saturday, Qatar’s Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani pushed for all parties to respond to the ongoing mediation efforts and to reach an agreement for lasting peace.
Qatar’s prime minister also held a phone call with Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, the Qatari foreign ministry reported on Sunday.
Sheikh Mohammed told Araghchi that Iran’s use of the Strait of Hormuz as a “bargaining chip” would only deepen the crisis in the Gulf, and said all parties in the conflict should respond to mediation efforts to end the war.
Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera’s Tohid Assadi said when it comes to diplomatic engagement, it seems that the US and Iran want the content of any negotiations to remain private.
Meanwhile, there is a mixture of different sentiments among Iranian citizens, he noted.
“Since the early days of the war, people have gathered to show their sense of nationalism and support for the political establishment,” he said.
“But we also know that there is a sense of frustration, especially when it comes to soaring prices and economic difficulties,” he added.
At a meeting on the reconstruction after damage caused by the war, President Masoud Pezeshkian said negotiations with the US on ending the war do not mean Iran is surrendering.
“The goal is to realise the rights of the Iranian people and defend national interests with authority,” he said.
Source link
A Chicago bank teller once hung up on Pope Leo, longtime friend recounts
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A Chicago bank teller once hung up on Pope Leo, the first American pope, after he called from the Vatican to update his phone number on his account, one of his good friends recounted to a parish in late April.
Father Tom McCarthy, who has known Pope Leo for over 40 years, told the story at a gathering in Illinois on Sunday, according to the Letters from Leo Substack.
After Pope Leo answered the standard security questions, the bank teller was presented with a screen that said any changes to his account would need to be made in person.
FIRST-EVER AMERICAN POPE INSPIRES FAITH LEADERS NATIONWIDE: ‘HEART OF INTEGRITY’
Pope Leo XIV was first brought to the Vatican by Francis to serve as prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops in January 2023, which is one of the most important positions in the Catholic Church as it vets bishop nominations issued globally. (Alberto Pizzoli/AFP)
“Would it matter to you if I told you I’m Pope Leo?” he asked, according to McCarthy, after noting that he wouldn’t be able to come in person to make the changes.
The teller then hung up on him.
A video of the story circulated on social media over the weekend, as reported by The New York Times.
McCarthy told The Times that the pope did get his number changed after a different priest was able to get in touch with the bank’s president.
“Could you imagine being known as the woman who hung up on the pope?” he said.
Letters From Leo’s Christopher Hale reported that Father Bernie Sienna was the one who connected the pope with the bank’s president, and noted the bank didn’t want to lose the pope’s account.
RUBIO TO VISIT ITALY, VATICAN AMID TROOP DRAWDOWN CALL, TENSION WITH TRUMP, POPE LEO: REPORTS
Pope Leo XIV fired back after President Donald Trump attacked him on social media, saying his calls for peace are rooted in the Gospel and should not be treated as a political argument with the White House. (Luca Zennaro/Pool Photo via AP)
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
“Eventually the number got changed — by calling another Augustinian. Father Bernie Sienna, McCarthy’s classmate and the then-provincial of the Chicago Province, knew the people who knew the people in Chicago banking. Word made its way up to the bank president,” he wrote. “The president cited policy. The pope’s intermediaries replied that he was prepared to move the account elsewhere. The bank did not want to lose the account of the pope. They changed the number.”
The Vatican did not immediately return a request for comment.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is reportedly planning to travel to the Vatican and Italy this week for meetings aimed at steadying relations after public spats between President Donald Trump, Pope Leo and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.
Rubio, a Catholic, is expected to meet with Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s top diplomatic official, Reuters reported, citing Italian newspapers La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Marco Rubio is also expected to hold talks with Italy’s foreign and defense ministers, the Italian newspapers reported. (Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
It is uncertain whether Rubio will also meet with the pope, who has been critical of the Trump administration’s peacemaking efforts in the Middle East.
Rubio and Vice President JD Vance attended Pope Leo’s inaugural Mass in St. Peter’s Square and held a private meeting with him the following day in May 2025.
Fox News’ Eric Mack contributed to this report.
Source link
Access Denied
Reference #18.490dde17.1778445922.305bdbd2
https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.490dde17.1778445922.305bdbd2
The genocide is still taking Gaza’s mothers | Gaza
On May 10, many flowers and many boxes of chocolates will be gifted to mothers in the United States, Canada and elsewhere. Greetings will be filled with joy and gratitude for maternal presence. Mothers will wear their finest clothes to spend time with their children, receive gifts and enjoy a beautiful day.
It is no wonder most countries in the world have a Mother’s Day, even if it is on different dates. Motherhood is a wondrous thing, and it needs to be celebrated. But there is one place on Earth where it brings heartache to many.
In Gaza, where 22,000 women have been killed in two and a half years, many children dread this special day because it reminds them of intolerable pain. Too many mothers have died and many more are gravely ill.
My own mother, Najat, who is just 46 years old, is suffering from cancer, which was diagnosed quite late.
On March 21, when the Arab world celebrated their mothers, I did not say “Happy Mother’s Day” to mine. Instead, I silently prayed that she would remain with us a little longer. I did not think about celebrations; I thought about my own fears of losing her.
On Mother’s Day, my mother did not wear her finest clothes and did not join us for a special meal, smiling and looking happy. She was frail and worn down.
A week before Mother’s Day, she had undergone her third round of chemotherapy and had spent days bedridden, unable to move and barely able to speak. No words in the world would have been enough to tell her how much she meant to me that day. But I stayed silent. On the day when others celebrated their mothers, I held back my tears so I would not add to her pain.
My mother’s case is not unique. The genocide has brought immense suffering to Gaza’s mothers. And that pain, misery and death start from the moment women step into motherhood. Maternal death rates during childbirth increased threefold during the genocide. A recent report documented 220 Palestinian women dying while giving birth in Gaza between January and June 2025.
The famine disproportionately affected pregnant and breastfeeding women, putting them and their children at risk of death and various health complications. Mothers had to go through the pain of watching 70,000 children languish due to malnutrition. More than 150 mothers had to bury their children who succumbed to the famine.
More than 22,000 women have lost their husbands and are now forced to be the mothers and fathers of their children, carrying on their backs alone the excruciating task of survival amid a genocide. Many others may not have lost their husbands, but they still are the main caretakers of wounded and ill children or the elderly in their families.
Many have to live with the constant throbbing pain of losing their children in the Israeli attacks; more than 21,000 of the victims of the genocide were children.
All the while, the burden of running a household has grown immensely as there is no running water, electricity, or normal access to food. Life in tents that do not protect from the scorching heat or the freezing cold, from disease or pests, is intolerable. And so is the loss of loved ones. Even the most resilient mothers of Gaza are at the threshold of their strength.
It is no wonder that so many mothers are getting sick. But Israel has also made sure that they are not getting the treatment they need.
The Israeli army has bombed all hospitals in Gaza and destroyed the only specialised oncological hospital. That has meant that not only are cancer and chronic illness patients not receiving proper treatment, but also that, during the war, there was no way to carry out the necessary regular checkups that can catch diseases in early stages.
The doctors told my mother that her cancer had been growing in her probably for nearly two years. Early discovery could have made treatment much easier and improved her chances.
I am truly living the worst days of my life. I am torn between my fear for her and the need to muster the strength to replace her at home. I see her break every day, little by little, which breaks me.
I am the eldest daughter, and so the responsibility for the household has fallen on my shoulders. My mother used to do everything as if it required no effort at all, as if life simply moved on its own. Now I have stepped into her shoes and realised just how exhausting this work has been.
I look at my only sister, who is just three years old, and try hard to convince her that I am happy and that our mother is fine. I keep telling her that Mom’s hair will grow back long and beautiful again. On every chemotherapy day, my sister asks me, “Where did Mama go?” I take a deep breath before answering that she has gone to the doctor. It is not a simple question to answer while trying to keep in mind the pain of the reality it exposes.
I cook, clean, and take care of everyone at home. When I am done and it is time to take a break, my mind does not rest. It keeps asking incessantly: “Will she recover? Will she come back to us as she was? Will these heavy days pass?” Every possibility that crosses my mind exhausts me and weighs heavily on my heart. This is not a passing crisis. This is my mother, and this is cancer, and this is Gaza amid a genocide.
We are now waiting anxiously for her surgery – full mastectomy – to be scheduled.
Doctors have said my mother also needs radiation therapy, which is not available in Gaza now. She has been given a medical referral, which has not been approved yet. She is one of 20,000 Palestinians in Gaza in urgent need of evacuation, which has been purposefully made brutally slow.
Every now and then, my mother looks at the referral paper that confirms her urgent need to travel and sighs deeply with sorrow. I cannot tell what she is grieving most, her illness, the mastectomy, her changed appearance, or the restricted Rafah crossing.
I am almost certain that her heart cannot bear all of this and that her mind may one day collapse under the weight of all this pain. Her suffering – and that of so many other Gaza mothers – will not even be captured in a statistic. It will go unseen – just as the architects of the genocide intended.
Source link
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s 5 solo Supreme Court dissents in one term
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stood out from her colleagues this week when she broke with them to rail against the high court’s decision to fast-track its landmark order dismantling a key provision in the Voting Rights Act.
But Jackson’s solo dissent was far from the first time the Biden-appointed justice has been on an island, as she has routinely blasted the court for not asserting more judicial authority over President Donald Trump’s executive actions and drawn rebukes from her colleagues for taking what they have viewed as flawed positions.
Ideological divides over high-profile cases have been common. The trio of liberals has remained unified against the Trump administration by opposing decisions, including on the interim docket, to curb universal injunctions, allow states to ban transgender medical treatments for minors, permit Trump to fire members of independent agencies, authorize the government to cancel immigrants’ temporary protected status and more.
But even in some of those cases, Jackson goes on solo diatribes, highlighting a deeper internal divide within the liberal bloc.
WHY JUSTICE JACKSON IS A FISH OUT OF WATER ON THE SUPREME COURT
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson speaks to the 2025 Supreme Court Fellows Program at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 13, 2025. (JACQUELYN MARTIN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Below are five recent times Jackson gave lone opinions.
1. Louisiana redistricting judgment
The Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s map last month, finding 6-3 it contained an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Upon request, the Supreme Court also decided 8-1 to fast-track the landmark decision — handing it down immediately rather than in roughly a month like it usually does — allowing several red states to more quickly attempt to implement new congressional lines after the high court weakened Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by limiting the role race may play in congressional redistricting.
Jackson, the bench’s most junior justice, broke with her eight colleagues in that decision, saying the court improperly “[dove] into the fray” of active elections by handing its judgment down immediately.
“Not content to have decided the law, it now takes steps to influence its implementation,” Jackson wrote.
LATEST SCOTUS LEAK A GIFT TO LIBERALS ‘SALIVATING’ OVER CONTROL OF HIGH COURT NARRATIVE: EXPERTS
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, wrote a scathing concurrence for the sole purpose of ripping apart Jackson’s dissent, saying her claims were “groundless and utterly irresponsible.”
2. Universal injunctions
The Supreme Court is still weighing Trump’s signature plan to severely limit birthright citizenship, but it first entertained the subject last year by addressing how lower courts across the country uniformly issued nationwide injunctions against the plan. The high court decided 6-3 to ban such injunctions but left room for judges and plaintiffs to deploy other methods when seeking widespread relief.
Jackson gave a rogue, separate dissent in the case, drawing eyebrow-raising jabs from Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered remarks at the Seventh Circuit Judicial Conference at the Swissotel hotel in Chicago, Illinois, on Aug. 18, 2025. (Getty Images)
“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,” Barrett wrote in the court’s opinion in 2025. “We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”
Jackson wrote that nationwide injunctions should be permissible because the courts should not allow the president to “violate the Constitution.”
Barrett disagreed.
“She offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush,” Barrett wrote.
Justices of the US Supreme Court pose for their official photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on October 7, 2022. (OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images)
3. National Institutes of Health grants
The high court fractured last August in dual 5–4 decisions that allowed the National Institutes of Health to cancel nearly $800 million in research grants.
Jackson, in one of her most memorable one-person dissents, appeared to boil over with frustration, observing that the majority “bends over backward to accommodate” the Trump administration.
“This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules,” Jackson wrote. “We seem to have two: that one, and this Administration always wins.”
Some of the canceled grants were geared toward research on diversity, equity and inclusion; COVID-19; and gender identity. Jackson argued the grants went further and that “life-saving biomedical research” was at stake.
4. Colorado conversion therapy case
When the Supreme Court sided 8-1 with a Christian counselor who challenged Colorado’s ban on counseling minors about sexual orientation and gender identity — which the state barred as conversion therapy — Jackson was the lone dissenter, warning that “to be completely frank, no one knows what will happen now.”
Jackson said the key free speech decision defied “treatment standards” and bucked the medical profession, leading an unlikely colleague, Justice Elena Kagan, to openly reject her dissent.
Kagan, an Obama appointee, said Jackson’s view “rests on reimagining—and in that way collapsing—the well-settled distinction between viewpoint-based and other content-based speech restrictions.”
5. Reasonable suspicion for police
In a lower profile case about police stops, Jackson conspicuously found in April that the high court overstepped its authority by improperly meddling in a lower court’s assessment of how Washington, D.C., police decided to stop a man in a suspicious vehicle.
The Supreme Court reversed the decision by the lower court, saying it should have weighed the “totality of the circumstances” surrounding the vehicle and approved of an officer’s decision to briefly detain the man.
The decision was 7-2, but Justice Sonia Sotomayor opposed the ruling while also opting against joining Jackson’s dissent. Jackson accused the majority of trying to “wordsmith” and interfere with a typically routine evaluation of a police stop.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson are pictured together. (Getty Images)
“I cannot fathom why that kind of factbound determination warranted correction by this Court,” Jackson wrote.
Jonathan Turley, George Washington University law professor and Fox News contributor, said in an op-ed this month that Jackson has “quickly developed a radical and chilling jurisprudence.”
Despite establishing herself as an outlier, Jackson also has a swathe of supporters from civil rights groups to celebrities. She has been showered with praise on “The View,” nominated for a Grammy for her audiobook and drawn encouragement from Democratic lawmakers.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Jackson said during her appearance this year on “The View” that “criticism is part of the job.”
“Dissents are an opportunity for the justices who disagree with the majority to really describe their view of the law but also their concerns,” Jackson said, adding that “you hope that your view will prevail in the long run.”
Fox News Digital reached out to the Supreme Court’s press office for comment.
Source link