‘No one should be under the illusion that this is a Hindu nation…’, Sant Samaj reacted to Arshad Madani’s statement

0

Controversy has arisen over the statement of Maulana Arshad Madani. Maulana Arshad Madani had said in his statement that the traders of hatred and those who dream of a Hindu nation should take a lesson from Nepal. A day will definitely come when there will be chains around the necks of the oppressors and the country will once again progress in the shadow of love, affection and justice. Now the saints have reacted to his statement.

On the statement of Arshad Madani, the saints say that Arshad Madani is absolutely right, he is right in the sense that there will be a chain around the neck of the oppressors. It is so that the people of Sanatan tradition, who follow Hindu customs or belong to Hindu religion, are not cruel. The oppressors are someone else and he was absolutely right in saying that the oppressors will have chains around their necks and the Hindu nation should not be like this.

What do the saints have to say on Arshad Madani’s statement?

It has been said by the saints that our country India is a Hindu nation. There is no such thing as a Hindu Rashtra in this. No one should be under the illusion that this is not a Hindu Rashtra, it is a Hindu Rashtra and will remain a Hindu Rashtra.

He further said that when it was divided, Hindustan and Pakistan became two countries, so this is Hindustan and Hindu Rashtra. Hindustan means the abode of Hindus and hence Hindu nation. What is the point of anyone speaking or not speaking in this?

What did the saint say about Nepal?

If we talk about Nepal, it is still a democracy. He further said that the number of Hindus in Pakistan was 24%, it was reduced to 2%. Because that is Pakistan. I want to say to Madani that he should keep his conduct and thoughts right. Lest anything happen that Madani too, I say that his ancestors too were Hindus. Now he is saying this about Hindus only.

India winning start in T20I world cup beat USA: With the help of Suryakumar Yadav’s strong half-century, India defeated America in its first match of T20 World Cup.

0

Last Updated:

India winning start in T20I world cup beat USA: In its first match of ICC T20 World Cup 2026, Team India defeated America by 29 runs. The Indian team, which came to bat first in the match, had a bad start, but captain Suryakumar Yadav batted strongly and helped Team India reach the score of 161 runs.

American challenge pales in front of Captain Surya, India wins by 29 runsZoom
IND vs USA

New Delhi: Despite the failure of the top order, Team India lost to America by 29 runs in its first match of the ICC T20 World Cup 2026. In the match, the Indian team had scored 161 runs at the loss of 9 wickets in the stipulated 20 overs. In response, America’s team could score only 132 runs at the loss of 8 wickets in 20 overs. In this way, Team India has become the second team after Pakistan to register victory in Group A.

After winning the toss in the match, America asked Team India to bat first. The start in batting was very bad and opener Abhishek Sharma was out without opening the account. After this, in the last over of the power play, Shadley Van Schalkwyk shocked Team India by dismissing Ishan Kishan, Tilak Verma and Shivam Dubey. However, captain Suryakumar Yadav maintained the lead for Team India from one end, due to which a challenging score could be made.

American team failing miserably in batting

In the match against India, America undoubtedly showed a strong performance in bowling, but its batting flopped miserably. America’s top order batting fell apart, especially in front of the new ball. Mohammad Siraj and Arshdeep Singh shocked America from both ends, from which it could not recover and remained away from the target. In bowling for Team India, Siraj took 4 wickets for 29 runs in 4 overs. Apart from this, Arshdeep took 2 wickets.

The rest of the work was done by Varun Chakraborty and Akshar Patel in the spin department. Varun took 1 wicket for 24 runs in four overs for Team India. Varun undoubtedly had a success, but this wicket came at a time when Milind Kumar had found his feet for America. Varun got Milind stumped by Ishan Kishan on the score of 34 runs. Apart from Varun, Akshar Patel also spent 24 runs in 4 overs, but had 2 wickets in his account. Akshar took both these wickets in the last over of his spell.

How was Team India’s batting?

The batting of the Indian team against America can be considered very bad. Especially the players in the top order disappointed badly. Leaving aside Suryakumar Yadav’s unbeaten inning of 84 runs, the entire team was seen struggling against the American bowler in this match. Suryakumar hit 10 fours and four sixes in his unbeaten inning of 49 balls. Apart from them, only three batsmen could reach double digits in which Tilak Verma contributed 25 runs and Ishan Kishan contributed 20 runs.

Read this also-Pakistan’s attitude softened in front of ICC… agreed to talks

In the 13th over, India’s score was 77 runs for six wickets and the team was badly shaken but Suryakumar single-handedly handled the innings. South Africa-born Shadley Van Schalkwyk took four wickets for 25 runs in four overs. Barring Suryakumar, India’s famous batting line-up completely failed and at one point the team seemed to be heading towards a very low score. The signal was given right in the beginning when India could not score any runs on the first four balls. The American bowlers did not give the Indian batsmen any chance to play freely.

About the Author

Jitendra Kumar

Working as Chief Sub Editor in Network 18 Group since October 2025. 9 years experience in journalism. Started career with sports beat in ABP News Digital. Reputable institutions like India TV and Navbharat Times Group…read more

homecricket

American challenge pales in front of Captain Surya, India wins by 29 runs

Olympic committee: New transgender policy consensus reached across sports | Olympics News

0

A proposed new consensus between sports leaders across the globe about gender policy would be a first uniform criteria.

Global sports leaders ‌have reached consensus on a new set of eligibility criteria for transgender athletes, with the new policy expected to be announced within the first half of this year, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) said on Saturday.

It would be the first uniform policy adopted by the IOC and international sports federations, applying to major events in dozens of sports, including the Games and world championships. Currently, federations have ⁠their own rules, which can vary.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Details of the new policy are unclear, but it is expected to severely restrict the participation of transgender athletes who compete in women’s categories if they have undergone full male puberty before any subsequent medical transition.

The IOC, under its first female president, Kirsty Coventry, took the lead in June, opting for a uniform approach.

“Protecting the female category is one of the key reforms she wants to bring in,” IOC spokesman Mark Adams ⁠told a news conference at the Milan-Cortina Winter Games on Saturday.

“I would say it is going to happen shortly, within the next few months.

“It has been out to consultation phase and we had the ‘pause and reflect’ (period) on it,” Adams said. “Generally speaking, there is consensus within the sporting movement. I think you will have a new policy in the first half of this year. Don’t hold me to it, but that is roughly the timescale.”

In September, Coventry set up the “Protection of the Female Category” working group, made up of experts as well as representatives ‌of international federations, to look into how best to protect the female category in sport.

Before Coventry’s decision, the IOC had long baulked at any universal rule on transgender participation for the Games, instructing international federations in 2021 to come up with their own ‌guidelines. Under current rules, still in force, transgender athletes are eligible to take part in the Olympics once cleared by their respective federations.

Only a handful of openly ‌transgender athletes have taken part in the Games. New Zealand’s Laurel ⁠Hubbard became the first openly transgender athlete to compete in a different gender category to that assigned at birth when the weightlifter took part in the Tokyo Olympics in 2021.

Currently, for example, World Aquatics allows transgender athletes who have transitioned before the age of ‌12 to compete. World Rugby bans all transgender athletes from elite-level competitions.

United States President Donald Trump has banned transgender athletes from competing in school, college and pro events in the female category in the US, as Los Angeles prepares to host the 2028 Summer Olympics.

Trump, who signed the “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” order in February, has said he would not allow transgender athletes to compete at the LA Games.



Source link

Chloe Cole says $2M verdict sets precedent for future lawsuits

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A $2 million jury verdict is giving momentum to lawsuits against doctors who perform gender transition surgeries on minors. Chloe Cole, who detransitioned and advocates for similar cases, said the verdict will set a “massive precedent.”

The plaintiff, Fox Varian, was 16 years old when doctors performed a double mastectomy. Now, as an adult who no longer identifies as transgender, Varian argues she was not mentally well or mature enough to make the life-altering medical decision as a minor. 

On Jan. 30, a New York jury found two medical professionals involved in Varian’s case liable for malpractice, saying they had skipped key steps when determining whether irreversible surgery was the best course of action.

THE MEDICAL SYSTEM PUSHED TRANSGENDER SURGERY ON KIDS — NOW IT’S FACING LEGAL JUSTICE

Chloe Cole outside the Supreme Court building.

Detransitioner and activist Chloe Cole outside the Supreme Court building during oral arguments in the Skrmetti vs. U.S. case on Dec. 4, 2024.  (Fox News Digital)

Cole said the verdict could influence future cases involving patients who regret medical transitions they underwent as minors. Cole currently has a lawsuit pending related to her own gender transition that began when she was 12.

PRISHA MOSLEY: DOCTORS TOOK MY BODY APART FOR GENDER ‘CARE.’ NOW THEY ADMIT IT WAS WRONG

“We finally have organizational backing on this idea that these procedures, especially the surgeries, are harmful for kids,” Cole said on “Fox & Friends Weekend,” referring to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons‘ (ASPS) recent announcement recommending against gender transition surgeries for young patients. 

A transgender rights supporter holds a sign while standing outside the Supreme Court during a rally.

A transgender rights supporter takes part in a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in a case on transgender health rights in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 4, 2024. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

“We now have a legal precedent as well for attorneys to look to when they’re helping detransition patients get legal justice,” she added.

WINTER OLYMPICS MAKES HISTORY WITH FIRST OPENLY TRANSGENDER SKIER COMPETING IN WOMEN’S DIVISION

The ASPS updated its guidance earlier this month, recommending “surgeons delay gender-related breast/chest, genital, and facial surgery until a patient is at least 19 years old.”

Chloe Cole speaks as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene looks on.

Chloe Cole speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 20, 2022. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The group said it found “insufficient evidence” that the procedures have a positive risk-benefit ratio. 

Cole believes the new guidance and recent legal victory could lead to a wave of additional lawsuits.

“These lawsuits are going to flood the court system and make it so that these doctors realize that there is a huge liability to these procedures and give them no other sane choice but to stop doing this to children,” she said.



Source link

Super Bowl drives economic boon in the US ahead of game | Football News

0

The Super Bowl, the biggest event in American football, is set for Sunday with the Seattle Seahawks facing the New England Patriots at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California.

The massive sporting event is set to energise fans in both cities and will send thousands this year to the San Francisco Bay Area. Those unable to make the trip are still expected to spend heavily on food, drinks and watch parties across the United States.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Historically, the Super Bowl has been a major economic boon for host cities. For the Bay Area, the event is part of a stretch of three major sporting spectacles lifting the regional economy.

A local boost?

In 2024, the Bay Area Host Committee commissioned a report forecasting the economic impact of the 2025 NBA All-Star Game, the 2026 Super Bowl, and the FIFA World Cup, all taking place in the region. The report estimated that Sunday’s game alone would generate between $370m and $630m in economic output for the Bay Area.

Last year’s Super Bowl was hosted in New Orleans, Louisiana. State officials reported the event brought in 115,000 visitors who spent $658m in the city.

For consumers, Bank of America estimates a 77 percent jump in spending near the stadium. A study analysing spending patterns from Super Bowl games between 2017 and 2025 found that, on game day, spending surged in the postal code closest to the stadium, with the biggest surge in food and parking costs.

Hosting the game does come with its own expenses for cities.

In the case of Santa Clara, it is small compared with the forecasted output. Last year, it was projected the city would cost them $6.3m, which includes training personnel for the influx of visitors and other logistical needs. However, other games have cost municipalities much more. When Atlanta hosted the Super Bowl in 2019, it cost the city an estimated $46m.

In 2023, the day after the game, which was played in Glendale, Arizona, outside of Phoenix, was the single busiest at Phoenix Sky Harbor international airport in its history, with more than 200,000 passengers passing through the airport, which is a hub for American Airlines and where budget carriers Southwest Airlines and Frontier maintain a large presence.

Other cities have used major sporting events to kick off large-scale infrastructure projects. In 2004 – ahead of the Super Bowl in Houston, Texas – METRO, the city’s transit authority, launched its first light rail line just a month before the game. The line, now one of three in the system, runs from downtown Houston to the city’s football stadium.

Prior to its launch, Houston was the only major metropolitan city in the US without a rail system.

But not all infrastructure projects paid off. Las Vegas built Allegiant Stadium in the neighbouring suburb of Paradise when the city acquired the Raiders football team from Oakland during the 2020 season. A year later, in 2021, Las Vegas won the bid to host the 2024 Super Bowl. The stadium cost $1.9bn. Nearly $750m came from hotel taxes, but the rest was shouldered by local taxpayers.

“The economic benefits are relatively short-term, not just in duration, but also in scope. They’re limited to certain industries and specific locations,” Michael Edwards, a professor of sport management at North Carolina State University, told Al Jazeera.

“The NFL [National Football League] often uses the Super Bowl as a carrot to encourage cities to invest taxpayer money in new stadiums. You’re seeing that dynamic play out in places like Chicago and Cleveland, where officials are considering domed stadiums. Part of that push is almost certainly driven by the possibility of hosting a Super Bowl, which the league dangles as an incentive,” Edwards said.

Food spending

For those who can’t make it to the game itself, there is still a surge in Americans heading to bars and restaurants to watch the game or spending money throwing a watch party.

The National Retail Federation, which has been tracking Super Bowl spending for the last decade, expects that Americans will spend a record $20.2bn, or $94.77 per person, on the big game with 79 percent of that on food.

Spending has skyrocketed since 2021 when consumers spent $13.9bn, or $74.55 per person. However, that dropped from $17.2bn in 2020 when the Super Bowl happened about a month before the COVID-19 lockdowns in the US began.

For those hosting a Super Bowl watch party at home, it will cost more than last year to stock up on the quintessential game-day foods. Wells Fargo estimates that hosting 10 people will cost about $140 per person, up from $138 last year.

Chicken wings, a staple for football fans, are a bright spot for wallets; prices are down 2.8 percent compared with this time last year. Potato chip prices are flat, but dips like salsa have jumped 1.7 percent.

Healthier options are getting more expensive as well for those opting for a veggie platter. Cherry tomatoes are up 2 percent, celery has risen 2.6 percent, and both broccoli and cauliflower are up 4 percent. Beer prices are also climbing, up 1.3 percent from a year ago.

Advertising hits records

The Super Bowl is airing on NBC with the network getting a boost in advertising spending for the big game. NBC sold out of advertising spots for the Super Bowl in September for a record $10m on average for a 30-second spot – up from $8m on average last year when the games aired on Fox.

NBC also benefits from a collection of sporting events all taking part in February that drive up advertising revenue, including from the Winter Olympics. The opening ceremony is on Friday and will run until February 22. NBC has exclusive broadcasting rights for the Olympics in the US.

“With the resurgence of the Olympic movement, our strongest Sports Upfront in history, the early sell-out of Super Bowl LX, and the remarkable return of the NBA, NBCUniversal has solidified itself as a sports powerhouse, and brands have taken notice,” Mark Marshall, chairman of NBCUniversal’s global advertising and partnerships, said in a release.

The last time the games were in the same year, back in 2024, the two events were the most-watched events on linear television.

On Wall Street, the looming sporting events set to air on NBC have sent parent company Comcast’s stock surging up more than 4 percent over the past five days.



Source link

Christie claims Graham criticizes Trump privately despite praising him publicly

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said that while many Republicans praise President Donald Trump while in public, some of those same figures criticize him in private, naming outspoken Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., as one example.

During an appearance on “Overtime,” the online part of “Real Time with Bill Maher,” Friday, Christie was asked by Canadian Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland what “Republicans say to each other when we’re not listening about what’s happening in America right now.”

“Look, so many of my fellow party members, especially, come up to me because I say all this stuff out loud, and they — in the green room at ABC, they’ll say, ‘You’re so brave. That’s so great. I totally agree with you. [Trump’s] nuts.’ And then they go out on camera to be interviewed, and they go, ‘The greatest president since Abraham Lincoln,’” he replied. “And then they come back in the green room, and they say to me, ‘You know, I have to do that, but like I don’t really mean it.’ That’s what they say.”

GRAHAM THREATENS SHUTDOWN DEAL OVER HOUSE-BACKED REPEAL, WARNS JOHNSON: ‘I WON’T FORGET THIS’

Chris Christie & Lindsey Graham

Christie accused Graham of publicly praising Trump while criticizing him in private. (William B. Plowman/NBC; Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg)

Following up on Christie’s claim, host Bill Maher asked the former governor which specific Republicans are engaged in this behavior.

“Bill, ‘Overtime’s’ not long enough to give you all the names, but I’ll give you one. Lindsey Graham,” he told Maher, drawing shocked reactions from both the panel and audience.

Fox News Digital reached out to Graham for comment, but did not immediately hear back. 

GRAHAM BLOCKS TRUMP-BACKED SPENDING PLAN, CALLS IT A ‘BAD DEAL’ AS SHUTDOWN NEARS

Chris Christie and Donald Trump split image

Chris Christie (left) and Donald Trump (right). (Danielle Parhizkaran/The Boston Globe; Nathan Howard/Bloomberg)

Christie and Trump have had a complicated relationship over the past decade. Although he endorsed Trump after ending his own presidential campaign in 2016, their relationship soured after the president refused to concede the 2020 election to former President Joe Biden, and Christie later openly criticized Trump’s 2024 campaign.

While facing calls from fellow Republicans to drop out of the 2024 GOP presidential nomination race, Christie put out a campaign ad promoting the fact that he’s been the “only one” from his side of the aisle calling out Trump.

GRAHAM PUSHES BACK ON TILLIS’ CRITICISM OF NOEM, MILLER FOR LABELING MAN KILLED BY BORDER PATROL A ‘TERRORIST’

“Some people say I should drop out of this race. Really? I’m the only one saying Donald Trump is a liar,” Christie said while speaking directly to the camera.

Christie’s campaign said the commercial was the first spot in what they tout as a seven-figure ad buy in New Hampshire, the state that held the first primary and second overall contest after Iowa’s caucuses in the GOP presidential nominating calendar.

Chris Christie

Then-Republican presidential candidate Chris Christie speaks at a town hall campaign event Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2024, in Windham, N.H. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)

Christie charged in the ad that Trump “pits Americans against each other,” adding that the then-former president’s Christmas message to anyone who disagrees with him was “rot in hell.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox News Digital’s Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.



Source link

Access Denied

0

Access Denied You don’t have permission to access “http://hindi.gadgets360.com/mobiles/samsung-galaxy-a57-5g-may-soon-launch-in-india-gets-bluetooth-sig-certification-vivo-xiaomi-redmi-news-10966522” on this server.

Reference #18.50200117.1770490482.12fe4280

https://errors.edgesuite.net/18.50200117.1770490482.12fe4280

Starmer accused of hypocrisy over sharp cuts to World Food Programme | Aid

0

Keir Starmer has been accused of hypocrisy after cutting funding to the UN World Food Programme by a third while pledging to tackle “suffering and starvation”.

The reduction in UK funding to the World Food Programme (WFP) from $610m (£448m) in 2024 to $435m last year is part of a wider hit on aid spending that campaigners say is putting lives at risk.

On top of the WFP cuts, government has also failed to make any financial pledge despite hosting a two-day conference last year on starvation and malnutrition in Afghanistan.

A government spokesperson said the UK remained the fifth largest donor to the WFP.

The peer Michael Bates, a former Conservative aid minister, said ministers were cutting funding as cases of starvation were growing “exponentially”.

He said: “If this was just a UK story it would be bad enough, but we are seeing it is a French story, it is a German story and a US story.

“All these countries are cutting. There will be a time lag but this will cost lives. We have a responsibility to protect these lives.”

Bates said it was “hypocritical” to talk about the need for action and then to reduce government spending in an area in which the UK had been a global leader.

The UK made a commitment to spend 0.7% of gross national income on development in 2015 in order to align with a UN target. The Conservative government cut that commitment to 0.5%.

On entering government, Starmer told a G20 summit in Brazil that his administration would prioritise “the fight against hunger” and would tackle “suffering and starvation”.

But last year, Starmer announced that aid spending would be reduced to 0.3% of GDP by 2027, in order to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP in the same time frame.

Starmer told a G20 summit in Brazil that his government would prioritise ‘the fight against hunger’ and would tackle ‘suffering and starvation’. Photograph: Saul Loeb/Reuters

The pivot by the government comes amid a global sea change towards aid spending.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development projects that total global aid fell by 9% in 2024, and that it will have dropped by between 9% and 17% in 2025.

A further drain on UK spending on global humanitarian causes is the decision to use part of the aid budget on asylum seekers already in the UK.

The Home Office expects to spend £2.2bn of overseas development assistance this financial year on hotel bills alone.

A government spokesperson said: “When we took the difficult decision to reduce our aid budget to allow more to be spent on defence and security, our funding for humanitarian support including to address hunger was relatively protected, and we recognise how important food assistance is for those in need.

“The UK is the fifth largest donor to the WFP, which remains a vital partner.

“In October, the prime minister announced a further £20m of UK aid to ensure water, sanitation and hygiene services reach tens of thousands of civilians across Gaza. This is in addition to the £74m we have already pledged.”



Source link

Trump: Iran wants ‘a deal very badly’ after ‘very good’ nuclear talks in Oman

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The indirect nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran mediated by Oman were “very good,” according to President Donald Trump.

“Iran looks like it wants to make a deal very badly. We’ll have to see what that deal is. But I think Iran looks like they want to make a deal very badly, as they should. Last time they decided maybe not to do it, but I think they probably feel differently,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday.

The president added that the U.S. had a “big Armada” heading towards Iran, something he has spoken about in the past.

When he was pressed on how long the U.S. would be willing to wait to make a deal with Iran, the president indicated some flexibility, saying that he believes the two nations can reach an agreement.

TRUMP WARNS IRAN, DELAYS STRIKES AS RED LINE DEBATE ECHOES OBAMA’S SYRIA MOMENT

Donald Trump and Ali Khamenei shown in a split image

President Donald Trump said indirect nuclear talks with Iran were “very good” and that Tehran “wants to make a deal very badly.” (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

“It can be reached. Well, we have to get in position. We have plenty of time. If you remember Venezuela, we waited around for a while, and we’re in no rush. We have very good [talks] with Iran,” Trump said.

“They know the consequences if they don’t make a deal. The consequences are very steep. So we’ll see what happens. But they had a very good meeting with a very high representative of Iran,” the president added.

American and Iranian representatives held separate meetings with Omani officials on Friday amid flaring tensions between Washington and Tehran. Oman’s Foreign Ministry said that the meetings were “focused on preparing the appropriate conditions for resuming diplomatic and technical negotiations.”

Witkoff, Kushner in Oman for Iran talks

Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Hamad Al Busaidi, President Donald Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff and U.S. negotiator Jared Kushner meet ahead of the U.S.-Iran talks, in Muscat, the capital of Oman, on Feb. 6, 2026.  (Oman Foreign Ministry/Anadolu via Getty Images)

IRANIAN OFFICIAL SAYS NUCLEAR TALKS WILL CONTINUE AFTER US, TEHRAN NEGOTIATIONS HAD ‘A GOOD START’ IN OMAN

On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that indirect nuclear talks were “a good start” and that there was a “consensus” that the negotiations would continue.

“After a long period without dialogue, our viewpoints were conveyed, and our concerns were expressed. Our interests, the rights of the Iranian people, and all matters that needed to be stated were presented in a very positive atmosphere, and the other side’s views were also heard,” Araghchi said.

“It was a good start, but its continuation depends on consultations in our respective capitals and deciding on how to proceed,” he added.

Abbas Araghchi and Badr al-Busaidi shake hands

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi meets with Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi in Muscat, Oman, Feb. 6, 2026.  (Iranian Foreign Ministry/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/ Handout via Reuters)

IRAN SEIZES OIL TANKERS, THREATENS ‘MASSACRE’ IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ HOURS BEFORE US TALKS

While both sides expressed optimism about a possible deal, the U.S. moved to impose fresh sanctions on Iran after the talks. The State Department announced that the U.S. was sanctioning “15 entities, two individuals and 14 shadow fleet vessels connected to the illicit trade in Iranian petroleum, petroleum products, and petrochemical products.”

“Instead of investing in the welfare of its own people and crumbling infrastructure, the Iranian regime continues to fund destabilizing activities around the world and step up its repression inside Iran,” the statement read.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“So long as the Iranian regime attempts to evade sanctions and generate oil and petrochemical revenues to fund such oppressive behavior and support terrorist activities and proxies, the United States will act to hold both the Iranian regime and its partners accountable.”

The Iranian Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment on the sanctions.



Source link

UK supreme court hearing interrupted by history podcast played from judge’s phone | UK supreme court

0

As the highest court in the UK, the supreme court is usually the forum for proceedings of the utmost gravity. But last week, one hearing was momentarily interrupted by an unlikely and comic intervention.

As one legal professional addressed the bench, the voice of Tom Holland, host of the popular podcast the Rest is History, boomed out through the court’s microphone system, delivering a satirical impersonation of the late US president Jimmy Carter.

One of the judges inadvertently pressed play on an episode of the Rest is History on his phone, which then played into the courtroom microphones.

As proceedings were being recorded, the moment was captured and quickly circulated online. As the theme song plays and gets louder, the lawyer starts to laugh, while Lord Briggs, one of the judges, appears to look down at his phone.

“The Rest Is History. It was switched to silent, do carry on,” he said, prompting laughter in the courtroom.

The clip was quickly shared by the podcast’s social media team with the caption: ‘What was Jimmy Carter doing in the supreme court last week?’

A supreme court spokesperson confirmed that the video is genuine. They added: “Lord Briggs switched off his phone quickly and apologised to the court.”

The history podcast, hosted by Holland and Dominic Sandbrook, has more than 600 main episodes. Holland’s enthusiastic and occasionally wayward impressions are a regular feature of the show, which has over 20m monthly downloads.

The Rest Is History podcast is hosted by Tom Holland, left, and Dominic Sandbrook, right. Photograph: Chris Floyd/PA

Fans reacted online to the unlikely appearance of Holland’s voice, posting on social media. One said: “Of ALL of the impressions that could’ve played, of course it was the most accurate one.”

Another user said: “They couldn’t have picked a better intro. Imagine their shock when they heard Jimmy Carter resurrected from the dead.”

The Rest Is History launched in 2020 when Goalhanger – Gary Lineker’s podcast company – approached Holland to make a history podcast.

“They couldn’t work out who I should be paired with and, idiotically, I suggested Dominic,” Holland said in an interview with the Guardian. Sandbrook replied: “Yeah, you regret that now, mate.”

Speaking about the popularity of the podcast, Sandbrook said: “The truth is, history is quite embattled as a discipline. Lots of historians would probably say anything that tries to spark public interest must be a good thing … we wouldn’t have the number of listeners we have if people didn’t find history completely gripping.”

Holland and Sandbrook’s project is part of a wider network of podcasts under the Goalhanger umbrella, including The Rest Is Politics, The Rest Is Science and The Rest Is Football.

Previous guests of The Rest Is History includes Stephen Fry, who spoke about his fascination with Greek mythology, as well as Michael Wood, Mary Beard, Sir Ian Kershaw, William Dalrymple, and Marc Andreessen.



Source link