Australian banks passed interest rate hikes on to mortgage holders – so why haven’t they done so for savings accounts? | Interest rates

0

Shortly after the Reserve Bank lifted the official cash rate by a quarter of a percentage point, major lenders announced interest rates on mortgages would rise by the same amount.

Yet the interest rates that can grow their customer’s savings accounts are still “under review” – or the increases are being applied selectively – days after Tuesday’s announcement.

Given the cash rate informs funding costs, customers expect changes to flow through to mortgages and their deposit accounts.

Why the delay, given that the rate hike was widely expected and lenders had time to prepare?

According to Canstar’s data insights director, Sally Tindall, the banks are playing a game of “wait and see”.

“They’re looking to see what their customers might report back and they’re looking at what their competitors might announce before making a decision,” Tindall says.

“I don’t think that it’s acceptable. It shouldn’t be a lengthy consideration.

“It should be that if they’re passing it on to their mortgage customers, they should be passing it on to their savings rates, in full.”

There’s an obvious reason the banks don’t want to give all savers an automatic rate lift: the less paid to customers, the better their balance sheet looks.

But they do need to entice customers because such deposit accounts finance bank operations, including mortgages.

The problem for consumers is that savings products have become so complex that it’s often not clear if they are getting a good deal.

Sign up: AU Breaking News email

In recent years, banks have heavily promoted bonus-interest products, which have much higher headline rates than regular savings accounts.

However, there are a range of conditions that can also trip up customers, leaving many earning almost no interest. Savers can easily be disqualified from earning the advertised headline rates when they do not make a deposit into their account each month or grow the balance. Some products also require customers to make no withdrawals.

The consumer regulator has found that about two-in-three customers with bonus accounts miss out on the headline interest rate.

When savers fail to qualify for their bonus rate, the bank gets access to their money for virtually nothing.

If it feels like the big retail banks – Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, National Australia Bank and ANZ – are being very strategic about their savings rate decisions, it’s because they are.

Two days after the rate announcement, Westpac announced that savings rates would rise – but customers should read the fine print.

For example, the interest rate on one of its savings products for people aged 18 to 34 will be bumped up by 25 basis points to an attention grabbing 5.25%, although there are limits on account sizes and multiple conditions.

Banks want to entice young adults into their savings products because that might translate into a mortgage down the track.

If conditions on the young adult-focused product are breached, the rate drops to just 0.1%. It’s notable the rate increase has not been applied to the base rate.

At the time of writing, the three other majors still have their savings rates under review, three days after the rate announcement.

The major banks were contacted for comment. NAB says savings rate changes may roll out at different times across products “reflecting differences in funding costs, market conditions, and product features”.

Given households are holding record levels of cash, competition for deposits is muted. This opens the way for Australia’s biggest financial institutions to play this strategic game, as opposed to having them fight ferociously for your savings.

Tindall says customers should consider “taking your nest egg shopping” to find a better deal.

“If more customers moved and chopped around more regularly, we would see a boost in that competition because banks need deposits from households to help fund their home loans,” Tindall says.

“It is an important source of their funding, and if they’re not getting enough of that in the door, then they’re going to have to post more competitive rates.”

Outside the big four banks, Canstar notes that ING’s rate on its savings maximiser has been lifted to 5%, although there are conditions and the base rate for those who fall foul of its terms is almost zero.

Macquarie’s offer of 4.5% is on track to be the highest “no-strings attached” ongoing savings rate in the market, according to the comparison site.

If the response of lenders to Tuesday’s rate increase has you seeing red, spare a thought for mortgage customers of the Bank of Queensland-owned ME Bank.

They received an email this week that said the bank was “pleased” to be passing on the rate increase in full to their variable rate home loans.

ME Bank followed up with an apology, acknowledging that “rate increases can be challenging, and we’re here to support you”.



Source link

FDA relaxes artificial colors rules for natural color alternatives

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced Thursday that it will relax federal regulations governing when companies may label their products as free of artificial coloring.

The FDA said businesses can now label products as “no artificial colors” if the coloring is natural or plant-based.

“Companies will now have flexibility to claim products contain ‘no artificial colors’ when the products do not contain petroleum-based colors,” the FDA said. “In the past, companies were generally only able to make such claims when their products had no added color whatsoever — whether derived from natural sources or otherwise.” 

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. praised the policy shift, saying it will ease the transition for companies while advancing efforts to make food safer.

FDA BANS RED FOOD DYE DUE TO POTENTIAL CANCER RISK

Grocery store

An unspecified grocery store seen in Virginia on July 13, 2022.  (Xinhua via Getty Images)

“This is real progress,” RFK Jr. said in a statement. “We are making it easier for companies to move away from petroleum-based synthetic colors and adopt safer, naturally derived alternatives. This momentum advances our broader effort to help Americans eat real food and Make America Healthy Again.”

The agency also expanded its list of approved naturally-sourced food colorings, adding beetroot red and broadening the approved use of spirulina extract.

The new additions bring the total number of food color options approved under the current administration to six, the FDA said. 

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shown close up.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks during an event.  (Getty Images)

FDA BANS ARTIFICIAL RED DYE: WHAT THIS MEANS FOR CONSUMERS

Health officials said the changes were made in recognition that coloring derived from natural sources should not be classified as artificial.

“We acknowledge that calling colors derived from natural sources ‘artificial’ might be confusing for consumers and a hindrance for companies to explore alternative food coloring options,” FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said in a statement. “We’re taking away that hindrance and making it easier for companies to use these colors in the foods our families eat every day.”

As part of the Trump administration’s initiative to Make America Healthy Again, the HHS and the FDA in April 2025 began a series of actions to phase out all petroleum-based synthetic colors from the nation’s food supply.

FDA sign outside headquarters.

Signage is seen outside of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) headquarters in White Oak, Maryland, U.S., August 29, 2020. (REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Previously, in January 2025, health officials banned red food dye known as Red 3, or erythrosine, citing potential cancer risks.

Food manufacturers were given until January 2027 to remove it from their products, while drug manufacturers will have until January 2028 to do the same.  



Source link

Republicans dismiss whistleblower complaint against Tulsi Gabbard | Trump administration

0

The Republican leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees have rejected a top-secret complaint from an anonymous government insider alleging that Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, withheld classified information for political reasons.

The responses this week from Senator Tom Cotton and Congressman Rick Crawford mean the complaint is unlikely to proceed further, though Democratic lawmakers who also have seen the document said they continue to question why it took Gabbard’s office eight months to refer the complaint to Congress as required by law.

Gabbard’s office has rejected any allegations of wrongdoing as well as criticism of the timeframe for the referral, saying the complaint included so many classified details that it necessitated an extensive legal and security review. Select lawmakers were able to view the complaint this week.

Cotton wrote on X on Thursday that he agreed with an earlier inspector general’s conclusion that the complaint did not appear to be credible. He said he believed the complaint was prompted by political opposition to Gabbard and the Trump administration.

“To be frank, it seems like just another effort by the president’s critics in and out of government to undermine policies that they don’t like,” wrote the Arkansas Republican, who chairs the Senate intelligence committee.

When asked about the complaint, Cotton’s office referred to his social media post.

Crawford, the House intelligence committee chair, also of Arkansas, said he believed the complaint was an attempt to smear Gabbard’s reputation.

Democrats are pushing for explanations about why it took Gabbard’s office months to refer the complaint to the required members of Congress. Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the senior Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, said the law requires such a report to be sent within 21 days.

“The law is clear,” Warner said at the Capitol. “I think it was an effort to try to bury this whistleblower complaint.”

Warner said he also still had questions about the details of the complaint, noting that it was heavily redacted.

The top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, Jim Himes of Connecticut, said in a written statement that he would keep looking into the matter.

In a memo sent to lawmakers this week, the intelligence community’s inspector general said the complaint also accused Gabbard’s office of general counsel of failing to report a potential crime to the Department of Justice. The memo, which contains redactions, does not offer further details of either allegation.

Last June, the then inspector general, Tamara Johnson, found that the claim Gabbard distributed classified information along political lines did not appear to be credible, according to the current watchdog, Christopher Fox. Johnson was “unable to assess the apparent credibility” of the accusation about the general counsel’s office, Fox wrote in the memo.

Fox said he would have deemed the complaint non-urgent, unlike the previous inspector general, but respected the decision of his predecessor and therefore sent it to lawmakers.

Copies of the top-secret complaint were hand-delivered this week to the “gang of eight” – a group comprising the House and Senate leaders from both parties as well as the four top lawmakers on the House and Senate intelligence committees.

Andrew Bakaj, attorney for the person who made the complaint, has said that while he cannot discuss the details of the report or the identity of its author, there is no justification for keeping it from Congress since last spring. Bakaj is a former CIA officer and chief legal counsel at Whistleblower Aid.

Gabbard coordinates the work of the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies. She has recently drawn attention for another matter – appearing on site last week when the FBI served a search warrant on election offices in Georgia that are central to Trump’s disproven claims about fraud in the 2020 election.



Source link

Chetan Sharma bold prediction PCB will make U turn: Pakistan will take a U-turn when playing against India, Chetan Sharma predicted

0

Last Updated:

Chetan Sharm bold prediction PCB will make U turn: Former Indian chief selector Chetan Sharma claimed that Pakistan Cricket Board will take a U-turn on the T20 World Cup match against India after February 12. This is all politics. There are elections in Bangladesh on 12th. After that you will see, there will be a U-turn. A statement will come out, saying, ‘Considering public sentiment, cricket should not suffer.

Pakistan will decide to play India on February 12, claims former selectorZoom
Pakistan will decide to play India on February 12, former selector Chetan Sharma claimed

New Delhi. The Pakistan Cricket Board is still waiting for the International Cricket Council to officially confirm its stand on the T20 World Cup group match against India. Former BCCI Chief Selector Chetan Sharma has made a big claim regarding this. He said that the PCB will take a U-turn on the decision of possible boycott after February 12. Chetan even said that he can also give a statement in which the U-turn will be talked about.

These statements of Chetan Sharma have come at a time when Pakistan Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif made it clear on Wednesday that the players will not take the field against India next week. The ICC is still hopeful that Pakistan will change its decision, especially after the apex body has warned of possible sanctions. Chetan says that PCB will change its stand after February 12, because this decision is completely political.

Chetan said in an India Today programme, “What was the fault of the Bangladeshi players? None. This is all politics. There are elections in Bangladesh on the 12th. After that you will see, there will be a U-turn. A statement will come which will say, ‘Considering the public sentiment, cricket should not suffer, Pakistan will play against India.’ The current stance is only due to Bangladesh elections. I myself have been in politics, have contested elections. After the elections, maybe the Army Chief will also say that sports should be kept away from politics and matches should be held.”

The former Indian fast bowler also said that amidst this entire controversy, Pakistani players are suffering the most loss. He said, “At present, Pakistan has not formally told anything to the ICC. Statements have no meaning unless there is official confirmation. Anyone can announce retirement, but unless you give it formally, nothing changes. Who is actually suffering the loss? Cricket and the cricketers.”

Whatever decision the PCB takes, Indian captain Suryakumar Yadav made it clear on Thursday that the team will go to Colombo and play the match. He said, “Our mindset is clear… We have not refused to play. The refusal has come from their side. The ICC has given the fixtures, the government has decided the neutral venue. Our flight is booked for Colombo, we are going. Whatever happens, the rest remains to be seen.”

About the Author

Viplove Kumar

Active in sports journalism for more than 15 years. Worked in cricket website of Etv Bharat, Zee News. Was the sports head of Dainik Jagran website. Covered the Olympics, Commonwealth, Cricket and Football World Cups. October…read more

homecricket

Pakistan will decide to play India on February 12, claims former selector

Move out of Westminster or face 60 years of repairs, MPs warned | UK News

0


Restoring the crumbling Houses of Parliament could cost more than £39bn and take between 38 and 61 years to complete, parliamentarians have been told.

It’s one of two proposals being considered by MPs and peers, and would see work on the building, which mostly dates from the Victorian era, completed in stages.

Under the second option presented by the restoration and renewal client board, both houses would leave the Palace of Westminster for between 19 and 24 years while works take place at a cost of up to £15.6bn.

The client board, which is made up of members of the commissions of both Houses of Parliament, warned in a statement on Thursday that a decision on starting restoration work “is needed now”.

It said the site’s fabric and services “have deteriorated and require substantial repair or replacement”, adding: “We are beyond the point where putting off these major works is sustainable.”

MPs and peers have also been asked to agree to initial restoration works at the Houses of Parliament lasting seven years, at a cost of up to £3bn.

That work could start in 2026 if approved with a motion from both Houses.

The board will then ask them to choose between the final two options by mid-2030.

Repairing the inside of the Victoria Tower, building a jetty on the Thames for deliveries by river, and starting underground construction on tunnel shafts are all part of the first phase.

If it’s decided to move out fully, Commons business will start to be transferred to the so-called Northern Estate – outside the palace but close by – and the Lords to the nearby QEII conference centre from 2032.

Current repair costs ‘unsustainable’

Repairs and maintenance of the Palace of Westminster currently runs at a cost of £1.5m a week, which is “unsustainable”, according to the proposals.

Heating in a large part of the House of Lords is set to fail and there are significant problems with the sewage system.

Since 2016, there have been 36 fire incidents, 12 asbestos incidents and 19 stone-masonry incidents.

Read more from Sky News:
New AI model scaring lawyers and legal firms
Kirsty Gallacher calls for more police on streets

The debate over how to revamp the Houses of Parliament has been ongoing for years due to the expected cost of the project and concerns about the condition of the historic buildings on the World Heritage Site.

MPs and peers had agreed a plan in 2018 for both the Commons and Lords to move to temporary facilities near the existing site to allow essential repairs and upgrades to be made.

But this was subsequently revisited amid concerns about the cost.



Source link

Trump says US retains right to militarily secure Diego Garcia base operations if needed

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump has warned that the U.S. could use military force to secure the Diego Garcia air base in the Chagos Islands if any future deal threatens access to the joint U.S.-UK installation.

Trump made the comments Thursday in a Truth Social post while also signaling his willingness to move past tensions with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after what he described as “very productive discussions,” over the Indian Ocean base.

Emphasizing the base’s strategic importance, Trump said the role of Diego Garcia was essential to U.S. national security.

UK REOPENS CHAGOS ISLANDS TALKS WITH US FOLLOWING TRUMP CRITICISM OF DEAL: REPORTS

chagos islands

Diego Garcia, the largest island in the Chagos archipelago and site of a major United States military base in the middle of the Indian Ocean, was leased from the UK in 1966. (reuters)

“It is the site of a major U.S. military base, strategically situated in the middle of the Indian Ocean and, therefore, of great importance to the national security of the United States,” Trump wrote.

Trump also acknowledged that the U.K. struck what he called “the best deal he could make” under the controversial agreement to transfer sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius while leasing Diego Garcia back for at least 99 years.

“However, if the lease deal, sometime in the future, ever falls apart, or anyone threatens or endangers U.S. operations and forces at our base, I retain the right to militarily secure and reinforce the American presence in Diego Garcia,” Trump warned.

TRUMP HAILS ‘GREAT AND VERY BRAVE’ UK SOLDIERS AFTER SLAMMING NATO ALLIES’ AFGHANISTAN SERVICE

U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer pose for a photo, at a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and President Donald Trump look to move past tensions about Diego Garcia military base in the Chagos Islands. (Reuters/Suzanne Plunkett/Pool)

“Let it be known that I will never allow our presence on a base as important as this to ever be undermined or threatened by fake claims or environmental nonsense,” he added.

The comments marked a slight shift in tone from Trump, who in January criticized the UK-Mauritius deal as an “act of great stupidity” and an “act of total weakness,” accusing Britain of surrendering a critical military asset.

Diego Garcia serves as a hub for long-range bombers, logistics, intelligence collection and military communications across the Middle East, the Indo-Pacific and Africa, hosting around 2,500 U.S. and military and civilian personnel.

The island base has been used for long-range U.S. operations such as in Afghanistan and in Yemen.

According to Reuters, Downing Street had confirmed Trump and Starmer discussed Diego Garcia during a recent call and agreed to safeguard the base’s continued operation.

UK REOPENS CHAGOS ISLANDS TALKS WITH US FOLLOWING TRUMP CRITICISM OF DEAL: REPORTS

Diego Garcia base

Diego Garcia is a strategic Indian Ocean base hosting 2,500 US military personnel. (Reuters)

“Turning to Diego Garcia, and the deal the UK has secured to maintain control of the U.S.-UK military base to protect national security, the leaders recognized its strategic importance,” a No. 10 spokeswoman said.

“The leaders agreed their governments would continue working closely to guarantee the future operation of the base and speak again soon.”

Under the agreement, British taxpayers are projected to pay roughly £35 billion [$47B] over the next century, including annual payments of about £160 million [$216M] to Mauritius, per public estimates.

Britain has also agreed to approximately £3 billion [$4 billion] in compensation over the life of the deal, with an option to extend the lease for an additional 50 years.

The agreement has also drawn criticism from Britain’s Conservative Party, which argues the deal weakens the U.K.’s strategic position and risks undermining long-standing security ties with the U.S.

TRUMP HAILS ‘GREAT AND VERY BRAVE’ UK SOLDIERS AFTER SLAMMING NATO ALLIES’ AFGHANISTAN SERVICE

Keir Starmer

Britain’s PM Keir Starmer speaks during a news conference in London. (Thomas Krych/Pool via Reuters)

Mauritius has said its sovereignty over the islands is “unequivocally recognized” under international law and has called for swift implementation of the agreement.

As previously reported by Fox News Digital, a Downing Street spokesperson also said in January the U.K. is continuing efforts to “allay any concerns” in Washington.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“We will continue to engage with the U.S. on this important matter and the importance of the deal to secure U.S. and U.K. interests,” the spokesperson said in 

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House and Downing Street for comment.



Source link

Trump rejects call from Russia’s Putin to extend cap on nuclear deployments | Nuclear Weapons News

0

US president says that he wants to negotiate a replacement for strategic nuclear deployment treaty that recently expired.

United States President Donald Trump has shot down an offer from Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin proposing a voluntary extension of recently-expired limits on the deployment of strategic nuclear weapons.

Trump said on Thursday that he wants negotiators from both countries to sit down and hammer out a new agreement, calling the old treaty “badly negotiated”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“Rather than extend ‘NEW START’ (A badly negotiated deal by the United States that, aside from everything else, is being grossly violated), we should have our Nuclear Experts work on a new, improved, and modernized Treaty that can last long into the future,” Trump said on his social media network, Truth Social.

Trump has previously stated that he would like China to be involved in the new treaty, but authorities in Beijing have shown little interest in doing so.

The expiration of the New START pact means fewer limits on the massive nuclear arsenals of the US and Russia, spurring concerns over a potential arms race at a time of resurgent anxiety over nuclear weapons.

Putin stated last year that he would abide by the treaty for another year if Washington would commit to doing the same.

The US, which has previously grumbled that the treaty limited its ability to deploy more missiles against Russia and China, has ignored the Russian offer.

Moscow expressed regret on Thursday over the expiration of the decades-long treaty. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia will continue with a “responsible, thorough approach to stability when it comes to nuclear weapons”, adding that “of course, it will be guided primarily by its national interests”.

Al Jazeera’s Shihab Rattansi, reporting from Washington, DC, said US and Russian delegations, who were in Abu Dhabi to discuss the war in Ukraine, reportedly also discussed extending the New START treaty for six months.

“It would be an informal handshake deal as the treaty itself doesn’t allow for any further extensions,” Rattansi said.

“Once that extension is in place, though, the aim is to begin formal discussions to craft an updated nuclear deal between the two countries,” he said.

Recent bouts of fighting between nuclear-armed states such as India and Pakistan have unnerved analysts, who worry about the erosion of taboos and treaties meant to restrain the use of nuclear weapons in conflict.

Putin also previously suggested that Russia could use nuclear weapons in response to Western efforts to support Ukraine, causing alarm among observers.

The first START agreement was signed by the US and the former Soviet Union in 1991.

A treaty titled New START was signed by former US President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in 2010, limiting each country to a maximum of 1,550 nuclear warheads and 700 missiles and bombers deployed and ready for use.

That deal was extended for another five years in 2021, following an agreement between Putin and then US-President Joe Biden.



Source link

‘Thank you Pakistan..’, PAK said on the match with India, Bangladesh jumped with joy, dirty trick exposed

0

Bangladesh and Pakistan quietly joined hands for the T20 World Cup against India. Now this has been revealed. Bangladesh’s sports advisor Asif Nazrul thanked Islamabad for boycotting the tournament and said that Islamabad has supported Bangladesh’s boycott by boycotting a match against India in Colombo.

“Thank you, Pakistan,” Nazrul posted on Facebook. He further wrote, “Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif has given a statement that his country has decided to boycott the match against India in protest against Bangladesh’s exclusion from the T20 World Cup.”

what is the whole matter
Nazrul is the sports advisor in the interim government led by Mohammed Yunus and the function of the advisor is similar to that of a minister in the department. Actually, Nazrul is the Sports Minister in the interim government, which was formed after the fall of Sheikh Hasina’s government in the July-August 2024 movement. The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has been asked by the Sharif government to abandon the match against India to be held on February 15 in Colombo, as Bangladesh had refused to play the match due to security concerns, due to which Scotland has been asked to play the match in place of Bangladesh.

What did the Pakistani PM say?
Nazrul’s letter of thanks came a day after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s statement. “We have made our stand clear on the T20 World Cup that we will not play matches against India because there should not be politics on the playing field,” Sharif said at a government meeting in Islamabad. He further said, “We have taken this stance very thoughtfully and we should stand completely with Bangladesh. I think this is a very appropriate decision. We are with Bangladesh.”

Earlier, Bangladesh Cricket Board’s (BCB) claim that India is not safe for its cricketers has been dashed by its own contradictions as it has allowed Bangladeshi shooters to play in New Delhi to participate in the Asian Shooting Championship.

read this also

If there is honesty then it is like this! When he went to steal, he was beaten by the public, the thief himself went to the police station and filed a report.

Anti-ICE agitators helped criminal illegal immigrants evade deportation, DHS says

0

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is detailing cases in which anti-ICE agitators actively helped criminal illegal immigrants evade federal arrest, including suspects accused of child rape, domestic abuse and gang-related violence.

The cases point to a growing pattern of organized interference with federal immigration enforcement during recent ICE operations. 

“These are the monsters that agitators and sanctuary politicians are protecting,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News Digital. “We remind the public that obstructing law enforcement is a felony and a federal crime.”

FROM PROTEST TO FELONY: THE LINES MINNESOTA ANTI-ICE AGITATORS MAY BE CROSSING 

Protesters face off with Minneapolis police officers in Minneapolis, Minn.

Protesters, using whistles to alert neighborhoods to ICE activity, face off with Minneapolis police officers in Minneapolis, Minneapolis, on Jan. 24, 2026.  (Roberto Schmidt / AFP via Getty Images)

According to DHS, members of the anti-ICE Colorado Rapid Response Network, alerted Jose Reyes Leon-Deras, a convicted child rapist, of ICE’s presence on June 20, 2025. A Facebook post by the anti-ICE group, accused by DHS of facilitating Leon-Deras’ evasion on June 20, indicates members affiliated with the anti-ICE group used a bullhorn that day to alert potential targets of ICE. The post suggested that police left without serving any warrants, while noting that agents returned the following days as well. 

Per DHS, federal agents finally arrested Leon-Deras on June 27, and he was issued a final order of removal on Oct. 30 amid the Trump administration’s ongoing operations in Colorado.

In a separate situation in Minneapolis, an apartment manager allegedly prevented federal immigration agents from entering a building where a criminal foreign national from Somalia, convicted of violent sex crimes and previously arrested for a high-level assault, was located. 

DHS accused the apartment manager of actively protecting a sex offender, Mahad Abdulkadir Yusuf, who had a conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree. He allegedly forcibly compelled his victim to perform sex acts on him on multiple occasions. 

Meanwhile, according to DHS, Yusuf had also been arrested in 2016 for first-degree assault and had an active warrant out for obstructing police.

WEEKEND ROUNDUP: CONVICTED MURDERERS, CHILD SEX ABUSERS AMONG ILLEGAL ALIENS NABBED BY ICE ACROSS US 

Yusuf originally entered the United States in 1996 and was a lawful permanent resident, but his crimes made him eligible for removal, and ICE arrested him on Dec. 31. 

Another child sex offender, Jozias Natanael Carmona-Pena, was allegedly assisted by not only agitators but sanctuary city leaders in Minneapolis as well, according to DHS. 

Carmona-Pena had pending charges for lewd and lascivious acts with a child, but he was released onto the streets of Minneapolis after local law enforcement allegedly denied ICE’s detainer request that Carmona-Pena be held until they could pick him up for immigration violations, according to the Trump administration. Meanwhile, Carmona-Pena was issued a final order of removal in 2023 but remained in the country.

Mugshots of criminal illegal aliens who ICE agitators have tried to protect from being arrested

Pictured are five criminal illegal aliens, whose charges range from child rape to domestic abuse, who ICE agitators allegedly tried to help evade arrest, according to the Department of Homeland Security. (Department of Homeland Security/Getty Images)

When federal officials sought to arrest Carmona-Pena on Dec. 10, agitators allegedly swarmed immigration officials and obstructed their attempts to arrest the illegal alien accused of child sex crimes, including by ramming one of their cars into an ICE vehicle. 

Local police subsequently responded and provided assistance, but according to DHS, the actions allowed Carmona-Pena to avoid arrest. He was eventually caught later that same month on Dec. 27, and is now in custody pending his removal.    

In another case from Milwaukee, a federal judge, Hannah Dugan, was convicted of felony obstruction for directing a criminal illegal alien, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, charged with domestic abuse, out a backdoor inside her courthouse to avoid ICE agents. According to DHS, Flores-Ruiz had other violent criminal charges on his record, from strangulation, suffocation, and battery, to domestic abuse, when he was eventually arrested following the April evasion incident with Dugan. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Federal immigration officials in Illinois who were chasing down an alleged Venezuelan gang member in Illinois were obstructed by agitators as well, according to DHS, which said when the suspect tried to barricade himself inside an apartment — after ramming his car into police — bystanders formed around the officers and began throwing rocks and bottles at them.

The car of a criminal illegal alien gang member after he rammed it into police as they were giving chase

Luis Jesus Acosta Gutierrez, an illegal alien from Venezuela and suspected member of Tren de Aragua (TdA), rammed his car into police as they sought to chase him down. Agitators attempted to obstruct ICE agents as they tried to bring Acosta Gutierrez, who had barricaded himself inside an apartment, into custody. (Department of Homeland Security (DHS))

Meanwhile, according to DHS, local police would not come to assist. Following several hours of negotiation, ICE officials were able to take Acosta into custody. 

“As our law enforcement are putting their lives on the line to arrest heinous criminals including child rapists, sex offenders, gang members, and other violent offenders, our officers are facing a coordinated campaign of violence against them,” McLaughlin said Thursday. “President Trump and Secretary Noem have been very clear; we will NOT let agitators slow us down from removing criminal illegal aliens from American neighborhoods. If you obstruct or assault law enforcement, you will be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”



Source link

Stock Market Live Updates Feb 6: Stock to buy today: Gallantt Ispat (₹596.80) – BUY

0

Businessman using laptop trading and analysis data on stock market investments funds and digital assets, Economy, Financial, Banking and exchange currency, Business investment and finance technology istock photo for BL

Businessman using laptop trading and analysis data on stock market investments funds and digital assets, Economy, Financial, Banking and exchange currency, Business investment and finance technology istock photo for BL | Photo Credit: iStockphoto

talk Market Today | Stock Market Live Updates 6 February – Find here all the live updates related to Sensex, Nifty, BSE, NSE share prices and Indian stock markets for 6 February.

  • February 6, 2026 06:48

    Stock market live updates today: Stock to buy today: Gallantt Ispat (₹596.80) – BUY

    The short-term outlook is bullish for Gallantt Ispat. The stock has surged 15 per cent since Budget Day. The rise over the last two days has taken the share price well above the 200-Day Moving Average (DMA). This gives an early sign of a bullish trend reversal.

    Gallantt Ispat turns bullish after 200-day moving average breakout

    The 200-DMA near ₹573 now acts as a key reference level, with strong support seen in the ₹560–₹550 zone. If momentum sustains, the share price can climb towards ₹680 in the coming weeks.

Published on February 6, 2026